Jump to content

Carnage in Cape Town


julianlev

Recommended Posts

Posted
ponting was phenomenol in the 2005 Ashes series against some high quality pace bowling. Kallis is one player who has always struggled in England and his record against Australia is nothing to boast about.
What you talking about?? Ponting the FTB averaged a miserly 39 with only 1 ton and 1 50, you call that phenomanal, I call it letting your country down. Ponting has mediocre record in England and pathetic record in India. Can't play swing/seam or turning ball!
Posted
Yes for sure and I think we will whitewash them.
Really?, Sid, really? Remember how peeps were overconfident abt Indian team before Eng Test series. Just sayin' mate.
Posted
Really?, Sid, really? Remember how peeps were overconfident abt Indian team before Eng Test series. Just sayin' mate.
Halo, Excuse me dear! but sid is joking
Posted
Cant play swing or spin ...if batsmen can be tagged as FTB's with one weakness ' date=' be it swing,spin,bounce ..no reason why Ponting dosent qualify here.[/quote'] He has only struggled in India playing spin,otherwise he has a pretty decent record in sub continent. And as far as cant play swing is concerned,dont know what you are talking about.His 100 in Old Trafford test(that vamos_rafa talked about in an earlier post) was a pretty decent one and also the one at Headingley ,his 1st 100 in England.Dont want to bring ODIs into this but in a ODI vs NZ at Mohali(in CT 2006) ,the way he played Bond and Mills in the first 10 overs of that game was a great sight.If you had seen that innings you wouldnt have talked about his play against swing bowling. His career may be coming to an end now but he certainly isnt a FTB.
Posted
^ you don't rely on others ' date='you win match on your own :)[/quote'] wahi toh keh rahaa hain woh. Aab to saala Australia par bhi bharosa nahi kar sakte.:haha::haha:
Posted
I doubt pitch was that bad. Bowling was good' date=' but batsman looked inept with lack of footwork.[/quote'] There was nothing wrong with the track. It was a good sporting track offering a little seam movement as the South African tracks do. But on the second day after lunch, it had something to do with the tide (I heard the commentators say that) which made the ball swing crazily and the batsmen from either side obviously could not cope with it and 18 wickets fell in two hours. It had to be the most chaotic session of test cricket ever!! But I loved it just because India was not playing!!
Posted
Who said ? I don't think so. I think it is not used because of its own share of controversial decisions. Its still not fool proof.
No, Ganesh is right. Snicko takes time - if you notice, the snicko replay is usually shown after an over or two.
Posted
No' date=' Ganesh is right. Snicko takes time - if you notice, the snicko replay is usually shown after an over or two.[/quote'] Is that so? I thought it takes a minute or two. If that is the case then its not worth the use in UDRS.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...