rkt.india Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 Bhajji would be there for sure. That'w hat I think. Selectors would bank on his experience. But on what basis, they should pick him as he was dropped because of poor form and he has not gained any form since then even in Ranjis.
vamos_rafa Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 But on what basis' date=' they should pick him as he was dropped because of poor form and he has not gained any form since then even in Ranjis.[/quote'] He would be picked solely on the basis of experience. Not that I am in favour of it, but I have this gut feeling that he would be brought back pretty soon. Either against the Windies ODI series, to keep him in the equation, or would be given a direct ticket to Australia.
rkt.india Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 He would be picked solely on the basis of experience. Not that I am in favour of it' date=' but I have this gut feeling that he would be brought back pretty soon. Either against the Windies ODI series, to keep him in the equation, or would be given a direct ticket to Australia.[/quote'] But He has not done anything to talk about in Australia.
Dravid_TheWall Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 Unless Aaron plays in 3rd test we can't justify taking him to Aus. His FC record also isn't that great. I don't like the idea of taking 2 rookies. I would take Zak, Sree, PK, Yadav, Ojha.
BeautifulGame Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Unless Aaron plays in 3rd test we can't justify taking him to Aus. His FC record also isn't that great. I don't like the idea of taking 2 rookies. I would take Zak, Sree, PK, Yadav, Ojha. No point taking a bowler like Sreesanth who is getting thrashed in plate league.We cant justify taking him to Aus.His International record in last 2 years also isnt great either.
BeautifulGame Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 He would be picked solely on the basis of experience. Not that I am in favour of it' date=' but I have this gut feeling that he would be brought back pretty soon. Either against the Windies ODI series, to keep him in the equation, or would be given a direct ticket to Australia.[/quote'] Cant see that happening.If that was the case he wouldnt have been dropped by selectors from WI series.
Dravid_TheWall Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 No point taking a bowler like Ishant who is getting thrashed by even WI tail.We cant justify taking him to Aus.His International record in last 4 years also isnt great either against top sides. Corrected :hysterical:
Number Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Same crap from last 10 days. Hope mods will be bored of this trolling.
Dravid_TheWall Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Same crap from last 10 days. Hope mods will be bored of this trolling. It was "beautiful game" who started it, read above.
BeautifulGame Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Corrected :hysterical: Stiil his record is better than SreeSanth and atleast he is getting top order International batsmen. Much much better than leaking 6 an over in plate league.
JeffThommo_fan Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Perhaps, but you can't discard PK due to Aus conditions. When somone takes wickets, they deserve a run. Also PK has got swing in Australia in ODI's. You say he didn't win us a game? How can PK win a game when all the other bowlers don't perform and the batsmen don't score runs??? PK was the only bowler who won the respect of the english fans when I was watching, he was bowling well. The English fans and commies liked him a lot coz they want him to be playing against them. They were not afraid of him. The english commentators were praising him a lot coz he is a good steady bowler but he couldn't run through English team batting line up in one session or take a quickfire 5-fer. Its a common tactic, you sometimes want some players to be playing against you. Obviously, he is good bowler but he can't run through a top team batting line up
Dravid_TheWall Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 The English fans and commies liked him a lot coz they want him to be playing against them. They were not afraid of him. The english commentators were praising him a lot coz he is a good steady bowler but he couldn't run through English team batting line up in one session or take a quickfire 5-fer. Its a common tactic' date=' you sometimes want some players to be playing against you. Obviously, he is good bowler but he can't run through a top team batting line up[/quote'] No they didn't. I was at the games and spoke directly to english fans and people I know. They saw him as dangerous and a thinking bowler. So what if he can't get a 5 for in quick time. He was wayyy more dangerous than the others who were struggling to buy a wicket. With a bit more support he may have been able to do more things. To achieve his stats in a series where every other bowler was a joke, is commendable. It's clear you are a pace fan but that is only one dimension of seam bowling.
Cricket Tragic Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Isn't Sreesanth out with an injury anyway?
JeffThommo_fan Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Okay. I can see and understand the technicality aspect you are putting in. Frankly tell me, when PK was picked for the England tour did you expect him to lead the bowling attack like the way he did ? Agreed, Australia pitches will be quicker, flatter, bouncier, but again as PK himself says, "Ek mauka to deke dekho". And mine was not obsession, it was purely based on performances. He deserves a go ahead if the current selection is between PK and Ishant (if he under performs even in the third test and the practice matches) else it will be unfair. Height, pace doesn't matter. Skills are all that matter. No they didn't. I was at the games and spoke directly to english fans and people I know. They saw him as dangerous and a thinking bowler. So what if he can't get a 5 for in quick time. He was wayyy more dangerous than the others who were struggling to buy a wicket. With a bit more support he may have been able to do more things. To achieve his stats in a series where every other bowler was a joke, is commendable. It's clear you are a pace fan but that is only one dimension of seam bowling. Honestly I know, they are going to play PK in Australia. I just checked and his record till now is surprisingly very good, 27 wickets in 6 matches. I was actually not expecting him to become a leader in such a few games. So, as we all know that he is eventually going to play in Australia, lets hope that he do well there and India wins its first series in Australia.
zen Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Leaders in the poll: Zak, Ishant, Yadav and Ashwin If Zak is unfit, I would go with Ishant, yadav, Aaron and Ashwin
mani0993 Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Zak (if Fit..otherwise PK)' date=' Ishant & Umesh for quicks..& Ojha for spin. Ojha because he is more experienced plus Aus sometimes struggle more against left arm spinner (no stats to back it up...just my feeling).[/quote'] In fact I've seen Aussies struggling against Off-Spinners. Heard commentators and analysts say they are good against left arm off spinners. But if the choice is straight between Ashwin & Ojha then I would go for Ojha, because we've really played musical chairs with a performer. He deserves a place in any series now. Enough of this changing. Having said that, I would still love to see Ashwin & Ojha even though the wickets will not help. The third bowler won't make any huge merry if the other 2 fail terribly. So what's the big deal ?
rkt.india Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 Honestly I know' date=' they are going to play PK in Australia. I just checked and his record till now is surprisingly very good, 27 wickets in 6 matches. I was actually not expecting him to become a leader in such a few games. So, as we all know that he is eventually going to play in Australia, lets hope that he do well there and India wins its first series in Australia.[/quote'] Munaf too had 24 wickets in his first 6 tests. Sreesanth had 44 wickets in his first 11 test with an SR in 40s.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now