Jump to content

Virat Kohli you have arrived.....


Recommended Posts

Posted
Have high hopes from Rohit. The guy is the most talented youngster and should be in the team. Kohli and Rohit are the future of Indian batting.
I too have high hopes from Rohit, just that i have followed Virat's career and batting style more and it promises me more than anyone. Yes, both are the real deal, and I hope both remain the real deal forever.
Posted

Not just Virat, you have to be patient with anyone who makes debut at the test level. Some have been unlucky in the past but Kohli has been lucky enough to be given chances- hope he does well. And I still dont approve of his attitude :P

Posted
I too have high hopes from Rohit, just that i have followed Virat's career and batting style more and it promises me more than anyone. Yes, both are the real deal, and I hope both remain the real deal forever.
Kohli has a lot of attitude and fight in him. The way he came back in odis after he was dropped from the team and performed was an eye opener. He seems to be doing the same in Tests as well. Hope selectors give Rohit a chance as well in Tests soon.
Posted
I will say again.. VIRAT KOHLI is our best YOUNG GUN. NO ROHIT SHARMA. NO PUJARA.. NO OTHER ONE.. IT'S VIRAT KOHLI. VIRAT KOHLI VIRAT KOHLI.. FTW.. These nobodies who are plying now and worshipping Kohli were all being so Anti-Virat just 2 games ago. PATIENCE is the key. He is going to be your next champion player who will bring more smiles to you than anyone from Indian team in future. Time to worship him or whatever you can do.
Pujara will do far better if given the same number of opportunities (hopefully). I am glad that Virat is showing a learning curve but still one 50 in twelve overseas innings is nothing to gloat about.
Posted
Pujara will do far better if given the same number of opportunities (hopefully). I am glad that Virat is showing a learning curve but still one 50 in twelve overseas innings is nothing to gloat about.
lots of other ppl have struggled just as badly. how many matches did it take before ponting scored a 100 in india.
Posted

wrong thread, yadav would have scored a ton had kohli given him support.... yadav looks a batsman who has a good enough defense nd doesnt bother to fish the bat around the off stump.... this guy along with the indian pacers is the only reason i will watch adelaide test

Posted

test team should look like this in sc gambo sehwag rahane sachin rohit kohli saha or kaul ashwin ojha khan yadav outside sc gambo mukund rahane sachin rohit kohli saha ashwin zak aaron umesh

Posted
test team should look like this in sc gambo sehwag rahane sachin rohit kohli saha or kaul ashwin ojha khan yadav outside sc gambo mukund rahane sachin rohit kohli saha ashwin zak aaron umesh
there shouldn't be sc/non sc team. if sehwag can't perform outside sc drop him. mukund will do well in sc, not sehwag standards but good enough.
Posted

on OP- thussa arrived- just because he scored a 50 when no one cared??? Indian bench still looks awful and the veterans are done gloomy days are ahead but no worries not too much test cricket for us in the next few months so we should be ok

Posted
on OP- thussa arrived- just because he scored a 50 when no one cared??? Indian bench still looks awful and the veterans are done gloomy days are ahead but no worries not too much test cricket for us in the next few months so we should be ok
are u crazy? no one cared? is it his fault that batsmen were falling around him? indian bench looks promising. all the guys who have done reasonably well on this tour are the rookies - virat, ashwin, umesh.
Posted

Fine knock, but could improve though, he could sure cut down the fishing outside offstump. But when he got it right, was delightful to watch. One of the positives to emerge from this humiliation - him and Umesh - and to a certain degree Ashwin too, who likes like an ideal lower order batsman.

Posted

I've been saying this for quite some time now that Virat has got what it takes to succeed at Test level. He might not have the technique of Sachin (who does anyway?) but what he has is the main thing that distinguishes between mere talented cricketers and Test cricketers - he has determination and a will to scrap. A Test cricketer does require talent but he need not be a Sachin to be able to bat everywhere. The few holes or inabilities are made up by the determination, in a good Test cricketer. And Virat has lots of it. He will come good everywhere in all conditions...may not be as good as Sachin but definitely as good as Lax and Rahul. I have more expectations and belief in Virat than Rohit

Posted
lots of other ppl have struggled just as badly. how many matches did it take before ponting scored a 100 in india.
True. Therefore it's better to exercise restrain and see where he goes rather than already making him a future ATG. He still has miles to go and tons to prove.
Posted
lots of other ppl have struggled just as badly. how many matches did it take before ponting scored a 100 in india.
I tell you one thing you cannot compare the two. For a batsman who has born and brought on bouncy and seaming tracks, it is easier to adjust to slow and low bounce tracks of India rather than a batsman born and brought up on slow and low tracks to adjust straigthaway on the fast and bouncy tracks of Australia and still what Ponting averages in India, below par. A player is a product of the environment and conditions, he has played in from the start of his career. Reverse the situation and think if we had the fast bouncy pitches and Australia had the slow and low bounce pitches who difficult it would have been for their batsmen to adjust and make a mark straightaway and our batsmen would have been used to in these conditions then, but it is not and most of our players find it hard to adjust their game to those conditions because those are tougher conditions for batting and helps bowler so as a batsman they are challenged more and we are not as used to playing genuine pace on fast and bouncy pitches as well as they are.
Posted
I tell you one thing you cannot compare the two. For a batsman who has born and brought on bouncy and seaming tracks, it is easier to adjust to slow and low bounce tracks of India rather than a batsman born and brought up on slow and low tracks to adjust straigthaway on the fast and bouncy tracks of Australia and still what Ponting averages in India, below par. A player is a product of the environment and conditions, he has played in from the start of his career. Reverse the situation and think if we had the fast bouncy pitches and Australia had the slow and low bounce pitches who difficult it would have been for their batsmen to adjust and make a mark straightaway and our batsmen would have been used to in these conditions then, but it is not and most of our players find it hard to adjust their game to those conditions because those are tougher conditions for batting and helps bowler so as a batsman they are challenged more and we are not as used to playing genuine pace on fast and bouncy pitches as well as they are.
but with the odi series in sa and the two knocks here he has shown he can bat on difficult surfaces.
Posted
but with the odi series in sa and the two knocks here he has shown he can bat on difficult surfaces.
Yes he has shown that but still a long way to go for him.
Posted

We are going overboard,Just beacuse he made a 70 on perth does not make him a future great test player,He played well but his weakness were not tested ,we have to wait and see

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...