SLICKR392 Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 Lol! Good to hear something like that from Dravid. Now it's Sach's turn to hit on Akthar. Akthar should have known his role. It's not him who decides how bad Rahul and Sachin was but it's them who decide how bad or good of a bowler he was.
rkt.india Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 he said he wasnt the best' date='but good[/quote'] Yes. Even Akhtar would agree that he was not the best bowler in last 17 years Dravid Played when he has played better bowlers in McGrath, Donald, Ambrose, Walsh, Pollock, Waqar, Bond, Steyn, Lee, Warne, Murli, etc. All better than Akhtar.
SLICKR392 Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 Yes. Even Akhtar would agree that he was not the best bowler in last 17 years Dravid Played when he has played better bowlers in McGrath' date=' Donald, Ambrose, Walsh, Pollock, Waqar, Bond, Steyn, Lee, Warne, Murli, etc. All better than Akhtar.[/quote'] LoL! Akthat would never agree...he has always thought himself as the best. No wonder players like Waz , Waqar got issues with him.
CG Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 Yes. Even Akhtar would agree that he was not the best bowler in last 17 years Dravid Played when he has played better bowlers in McGrath' date=' Donald, Ambrose, Walsh, Pollock, Waqar, Bond, Steyn, Lee, Warne, Murli, etc. All better than Akhtar.[/quote'] Akhtar was surely better than lee and bond in tests,He averages 25
rkt.india Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 Akhtar was surely better than lee and bond in tests' date='He averages 25[/quote'] BOND averages 22. For me, Bond was the best bowler of this trio of Bond, Akhtar, Lee.
ganeshran Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 Bond was one of the best bowlers of the modern era. Too bad his career got cut short by injuries
rkt.india Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 Bond was one of the best bowlers of the modern era. Too bad his career got cut short by injuries He could have been even better than Dale Styen but not for injuries.
CG Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 BOND averages 22. For me' date=' Bond was the best bowler of this trio of Bond, Akhtar, Lee.[/quote'] BOND Played 18 tests and that too most in favorable conditions ,he was hammered in sc conditions.no way he can be better than akhtar.
Cricket Tragic Posted March 9, 2012 Author Posted March 9, 2012 Why is the title changed? He said that Actor was just a good bowler rather than a great one. If you have to change it, shouldn't it be "not among the best" rather just "the best"?
NareshK Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 Chucktar doesnt deserve so much attention. He was also a drug abuser.
Stuge Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 Why is the title changed? He said that Actor was just a good bowler rather than a great one. If you have to change it, shouldn't it be "not among the best" rather just "the best"? Well ,you tried be "media" and gave bit of twist to what he said :P:giggle::giggle:
ganeshran Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 Why is the title changed? He said that Actor was just a good bowler rather than a great one. If you have to change it, shouldn't it be "not among the best" rather just "the best"? What were his exact words?
Cricket Tragic Posted March 9, 2012 Author Posted March 9, 2012 Well ' date='you tried be "media" and gave bit of twist to what he said :P:giggle::giggle:[/quote'] :giggle: Don't remember and I don't think the video is out yet. Leave it as it is.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now