Jump to content

ICC World T20, 2012 SriLanka


Feed

ICC World T20, 2012 SriLanka  

  1. 1.



Recommended Posts

Posted
I agree, it's a bit unfair to be honest with you. Both games should be played at the same time to prevent this. Having said that, probably not a feasible idea.. Good luck to you guys in today's match. Was a bit dissapointed to see Aus not go harder, but I guess we had to take care of ourselves first!
Frankly dont play aussies or hussey. They needed to do what they needed to do to go through. I think they were going for it but after 3rd wicket went down played safe. Blame goes on BCCI for this crazy format
Posted
I wanted them to finish it by 15th over..because we had that opportunity..I would have sent Raina instead of Yuvi.
Pathan should had been sent at that time
Posted
Dudes' date=' this thread is about us scoring those few extra runs to take our NRR over Pak in the event both games rained out. It is NOT about us chasing faster in general to put us in a better NRR situation.[/quote'] Ok Einstein, i'll get you a cookie for your discovery. But, this is the thread I found about NRR. Anyone even with a pea sized brain (like yours truly) wanted India to accelerate when the score was 90/2. We should have sent Pathan or Raina in, instead of Yuvi.
Posted
Hello people, like the after-effects of my thread ? :hysterical:
:headshake: :headshake: :headshake: :sniffle:
Posted
Frankly dont play aussies or hussey. They needed to do what they needed to do to go through. I think they were going for it but after 3rd wicket went down played safe. Blame goes on BCCI for this crazy format
The format for the super 8s is ridiculous. Why are all the group stage toppers in the same group? They're giving the host nation Lanka an unfair advantage by giving them a weak group.
Posted
Ok Einstein, i'll get you a cookie for your discovery. But, this is the thread I found about NRR. Anyone even with a pea sized brain (like yours truly) wanted India to accelerate when the score was 90/2. We should have sent Pathan or Raina in, instead of Yuvi.
India did exceedingly well by chasing 128 runs in 17 overs. What more did you expect ? Should they try to slog even when the RR is 6, lose wickets and then give a chance to opposition ? Try making sense with your posts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...