India 'A' to tour New Zealand in September 2012

[zaheer]

http://www.blackcaps.co.nz/live/

Thanks!!

[zaheer]

Suryakumar flailing the bat' date=' and now gets out[/quote'] How was our trundling?? and why Shami Ahmed is not in the team

[JaFanatic]

shouldn be a tough task 48 with 5 wks is reachable

[jairamesh]

How was our trundling?? and why Shami Ahmed is not in the team

Unadakt looked good but a tad expensive, but pitch is pretty good for quicks. Vinay did well too. Re: Shami :dontknow:, i asked the same, some think Shami isn't suited for one days. I think he should have played.

[jairamesh]

Rahul Sharma hits a SIX:yay:

[jairamesh]

Nope, it's a four now

[jairamesh]

:hysterical: This one is definitely a SIX! from sharma:hysterical:

[jairamesh]

****** Wagner having a go at the druggie Rahul :hysterical:

[vayuu1]

158/6 charsi playing well

[Number]

Charsi ne match jeeta diya. SL bulao use Chawla ko bhejo NZ.

[jairamesh]

India win good calm knock from Rayudu a good cameo from sharma

[BeautifulGame]

we won :yay:

[carnish]

Good Job by our trundlers .. I say they bowled better than Kiwi Quicks like Wagner and boult. Good to see VK, Unadkat and Mandeep do well. Hopefull Ojha, Menaria and Chand will do better in upcoming games. Also Mukund is not suitable for ODIs I guess.

[Chandan]

LINK India A cruise to victory over NZ A RICHARD KNOWLER IN LINCOLN 19/09/2012 New Zealand A's Derek de Boorder in action. The India A cricket team shrugged off the controversy of the dodgy pitch at Bert Sutcliffe Oval in Lincoln to beat New Zealand by three wickets today. Both sides were left frustrated by the decision to abandon their opening List A tour match after just eight overs yesterday because of the unpredictable and dangerous deck. Today's fixture was shifted to a new, and reliable, block. It was certainly enjoyed by India A, as they chased New Zealand A's total of 176 runs from 48.2 overs - running it down in 47.2 overs in fading light. Unmukt Chand and Abhinav Mukund rattled up 52 runs in their opening partnership before the latter was dismissed in the 15th over, when caught by Tom Latham, off the bowling of seamer Mitchell McClenaghan. The New Zealanders began badly - they were 54 for six by the 16th over - but the cavalry came in the form of Andrew Ellis and Derek de Boorder who added a vital partnership of 80. That ended when Ellis was run out for 45 as he scrambled for a single in the 40th over. De Boorder celebrated his 50 in the 44th over, but was eventually dismissed for 62 as the New Zealanders' ninth wicket was claimed. McClenaghan was the best of the New Zealand bowlers, snaring three wickets for 42 runs off 10 overs. The two sides will meet again at the same venue on Friday. Scorecard

[ShebbySB]

I've said earlier that Rahul Sharma can bat,he batted well & came ahead of Bhuvaneshwar Kumar:two_thumbs_up:.There is no damn reason why Chawla should be in the test team ahead of him.He's far better bowler than Chawla atleast.

[SLICKR392]

Pitch looked tough to bat on.. Unmukt, Mandeep, Rayudu, Rahul Sharma :congrats:

[Old guy]

Pitch looked tough to bat on.. Unmukt, Mandeep, Rayudu, Rahul Sharma :congrats:

this is much better a side,.. guys like mandeep and umukt have future and htis will benefit them and other then vinay i cant really complain abt bowling.. cos they made it clear tht they wont select players who are in test team

[Sooda]

Nice to see Mandeep amongst the runs too

[msb1991]

So why play him in the List A games here' date=' when we already have given chance to him in ODIs in foreign conditions too?[/quote'] Didn't fancy reading the non-bolded sentence?

[msb1991]

There is no damn reason why Chawla should be in the test team ahead of him.He's far better bowler than Chawla atleast.

This is beyond nonsense! Rahul averages 44.50 in First Class cricket with the ball, what is the excuse for that?