Jump to content

Atherton's interesting finish to his article.


Ram

Recommended Posts

Posted

........ Australian wicketkeepers, like Ian Healy, routinely question the footwork of their English counterparts. Australians like to skip across and take the ball on the inside of their waists rather than in front of their bodies. Two things make this more difficult in England: the lack of bounce and the movement of the ball in the air after pitching. That movement has been in evidence throughout the summer, making it nightmarishly difficult at times. So far in this match there have been 49 byes, 33 for Prior in 170 overs and (at the time of writing) 16 for M S Dhoni in 48 overs. Occasionally Dhoni has made Prior look velvet-gloved in comparison. For Prior, and for Moores, there is work to do, but it is far too soon to rush to judgment. PS… I don't think I've ever received more abuse than after last week's article on Sri Sreesanth's beamer. Writing about Indian cricket or Indian cricketers ought to come with a health warning, such illogical passion does the topic arouse. But that should never prevent us from tackling the issues that matter, and the beamer, whether bowled accidentally or deliberately, whether bowled by Brett Lee or Sri Sreesanth, or by a wheelchair-bound black lesbian, should be penalised with a ban. The colour or character of the bowler is irrelevant, it is the damage it could inflict which matters.

Posted

i dont think people had issues with him calling for a ban ... the reeking hypocrisy was startling ... it was fine when Lee did it ... but not when Santh did. Anyways everyone should be allowed to wallow in their own BS

Posted

I guess he deserved it. It is so stupid to call to ban a bowler because he bowled a beamer despite the bowler apologizing for it. I've never read a more stupid article than that one by Atherton.

Posted

Is ICF getting to Atherton? :hysterical::hysterical: I kid you not. This is what he has wrote in the times today about England " there is no doubt that when the pitches are slow and low, England are a more vulnerable team. They have lost five out of nine tests in such conditions, a statistic that brought the internet trolls out on monday evening, but it should not be forgotten thats England have their No 1 ranking on merit, by some outstanding cricket over a period of nearly three years." Expect some vindicative article by this loser in coming weeks against India. In another who sees the crusade against India as a battle of good versus evil!!!

Posted

Good news for me. I'll be bashing that s*cker's team 24x7 just like I do any other day. Maybe the banner over at the top has to be switched to a wide, grinning McGrath poster as well. That'll freak out the Pom.

Posted

well i agree they did deserved no 1 and now after losing so many matches they will rightfully lose it sooner or later :dontknow: got nothing against atherton its guys like hussain i despise :P

Posted

Atherton is an a hole. Another who sees India as evil, while england et al are the good guys preserving cricket for the good of humaity. He and his ilk could not accept it when we were No 1 test side and rightly so on merit

Posted
Atherton is an a hole. Another who sees India as evil, while england et al are the good guys preserving cricket for the good of humaity. He and his ilk could not accept it when we were No 1 test side and rightly so on merit
honestly dont know much about it.. and dont care people are always gonna whine check out wht our indian fans did with bumble :rofl:
Posted

Maybe they should recall him. He slightly edges out Ravi Bopara and can replace him in their line-up. Good fun for the rest of us, to see him humiliated again. Perhaps by Steyn, but hopefully by Philly.

Posted

He can live in his shell if he wants. People all over the world know that there is no "eye catching" cricketer in the England team who can captivate an audience. When India were no. 1 we had Sehwag(in good form), who's flamboyant strokeplay was a signature of us being the best. Australia had Gilchrist and Hayden who intimidated every Test side. There is no player in England, whom on looking at them I would say "Oh what an awesome side they are!". They are statistically number one, that's it.

Posted
There is no player in England' date= whom on looking at them I would say "Oh what an awesome side they are!". They are statistically number one, that's it.
Except Ravi Bopara! And Ian Bell! And Samit Patel! And Tim Bresnan! And Andrew Strauss! :laugh:
Posted

It's one thing to castigate commentators and totally another thing to live in denial and form weird notions of yourself to prove you were better than the other.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...