SLICKR392 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 SA couldn't win against England' date=' India or Australia in their home conditions, the aint no proper #1.[/quote'] But they can hammer others away from home. That is why they are a much better No.1 side than the other clowns. Link to comment
Crookbond Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 You mean present Aus team' date=' the aus great team beat us.[/quote'] Australia in India - 1969 and 2004. Too few to tell they are consistent. Link to comment
Guest Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Australia in India - 1969 and 2004. Too few to tell they are consistent. but when u compare our performance to OZ or SA....too few will look too big :winky: Link to comment
Spiderguy252 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Steyn > Anderson. Steyn > Broad. Steyn > Bresnan. Steyn > Finn. Steyn > Onions. Steyn > Any other Pommie bowler. Can't see what the fuss is about, really. Link to comment
phaedrus Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 still early days. hope they dont lose the lead as they so often have done. Link to comment
Spiderguy252 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 I expect it'll rain in one of the two remaining tests ensuring that they're draws? It's a wet summer in England from what I keep hearing, so that's a possibility for sure. Which means the Saffas have negated a series defeat already. Link to comment
ravishingravi Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 But they can hammer others away from home. That is why they are a much better No.1 side than the other clowns. this. Link to comment
Ultimate_Game Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 This is epic :hysterical: I would love to hear Vaughan, Botham, Hussain and Lloyd respond to Steyn :haha: Link to comment
Number Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Steyn > Anderson. Steyn > Broad. Steyn > Bresnan. Steyn > Finn. Steyn > Onions. Steyn > Any other Pommie bowler. Can't see what the fuss is about, really. Anderson etc. are not even the best bowlers of their time. Whereas Steyn competes with the best of ATGs. So he is in the diff. league altogether. But should've waited for this series to get over before making such statement. :headshake: Link to comment
Spiderguy252 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Anderson etc. are not even the best bowlers of their time. Whereas Steyn competes with the best of ATGs. So he is in the diff. league altogether. But should've waited for this series to get over before making such statement. :headshake: Nah, he's taken a calculated risk and it'll pay off, surely. I can't fathom any scenario where England come back to win this series 2-1. As for Anderson and co., LoL, do they even average below 30? Link to comment
Vilander Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Australia in India - 1969 and 2004. Too few to tell they are consistent. hmm but who is consistant, in comparison india never won in Aus. Its relative isnt it so Aus has done it. Link to comment
Spiderguy252 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 This argument isn't about the great Aussie team. Even if they never beat us, they were rightfully the #1 side in the world. But like it has been said, they DID beat us. 2-1 in 2004. Link to comment
India-KXIP fan Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 :hysterical: Steyn trolling the English. Good mind games. Link to comment
cowboysfan Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 The safers talked **** when we were over there and they almost lost the series. Link to comment
Ultimate_Game Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 England will lose the series . Yup we know :winky: Link to comment
jusarrived Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Yup we know :winky: They will win & you dont know that :winky: Link to comment
Texy Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 I love Steyn but this is over the top and will pump up the pommies...series is far from over Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now