Jump to content

Ranking India's WC 2011 team


Recommended Posts

Posted
Please. 70% of the job was done by the time Dhoni got to the wicket. Gambhir on the other hand walked in when the score was 0/1, and then lost Tendulkar 25 runs later. Respect.
:facepalm: The least people can do is read the posts above them before coming up with never seen earlier statistics.
Posted
Please. 70% of the job was done by the time Dhoni got to the wicket. Gambhir on the other hand walked in when the score was 0/1, and then lost Tendulkar 25 runs later. Respect.
How's reaching 115/3, or scoring 97 "70% of the work" and taking India from 115/3 to 275 or scoring 92 off 79 just 30% of the work :dontknow: What sort of formula did you apply and what sort of calculations are these :hmmm: Maybe you took a page out of Messers Duckworth & Lewis but I must warn you that thing works for shortened matches and not for evaluating or quantifying performances of players in a match :--D
Posted
Please. 70% of the job was done by the time Dhoni got to the wicket. Gambhir on the other hand walked in when the score was 0/1, and then lost Tendulkar 25 runs later. Respect.
:facepalm:
Posted
How's reaching 115/3' date=' or scoring 97 "70% of the work" and taking India from 115/3 to 275 or scoring 92 off 79 just 30% of the work :dontknow: What sort of formula did you apply and what sort of calculations are these :hmmm: [b']Maybe you took a page out of Messers Duckworth & Lewis but I must warn you that thing works for shortened matches and not for evaluating performances of players in a match :--D
:cantstop::cantstop::cantstop:
Posted

The group stage matches where important becauce had india lost the close match with england and yuvraj didnt come through vs the west indies we would have been tied with bangladesh on points. Plus their was some moments when minnows had india in some tough situations so I dont think we should ignore player performances in the group stages exspecially considering what happened to india the world cup before.

Posted

Just watching all the highlights from world cup now on star cricket.That six of Dhoni still gives u goose bumps :hail: Also just never noticed this before.Gambhir SR was 79.50 whereas Dhoni's was 115 in the match.

Posted
Just watching all the highlights from world cup now on star cricket.That six of Dhoni still gives u goose bumps :hail: Also just never noticed this before.Gambhir SR was 79.50 whereas Dhoni's was 115 in the match.
Who do you think was carting Murali around in the match? The way Dhoni manhandled Murali without taking any risk whatsoever was something to behold. Just check Murali's stats in that game against other batsmen and Dhoni and you will know why India never came under any pressure related to RR.
Posted
Just watching all the highlights from world cup now on star cricket.That six of Dhoni still gives u goose bumps :hail: Also just never noticed this before.Gambhir SR was 79.50 whereas Dhoni's was 115 in the match.
I was also watching the same :two_thumbs_up: and that very thing instantly captured my attention,he took some 120 odd balls. P.S: Intention is not to undermine anyone's effort, just an observation.
Posted
I was also watching the same :two_thumbs_up: and that very thing instantly captured my attention,he took some 120 odd balls. P.S: Intention is not to undermine anyone's effort, just an observation.
Such a selfish player Gautam is! :laugh:
Posted
Just watching all the highlights from world cup now on star cricket.That six of Dhoni still gives u goose bumps :hail: Also just never noticed this before.Gambhir SR was 79.50 whereas Dhoni's was 115 in the match.
Who do you think was carting Murali around in the match? The way Dhoni manhandled Murali without taking any risk whatsoever was something to behold. Just check Murali's stats in that game against other batsmen and Dhoni and you will know why India never came under any pressure related to RR.
As someone already mentioned, Gambhir was consolidating after quick wickets were lost. Dhoni only accelerated once the innings was already done and we were assured of victory Alos brilliant innings by dhoni but it was still only one match, Gambhir was good throughout
Posted
Such a selfish player Gautam is! :laugh:
:nono:
As someone already mentioned, Gambhir was consolidating after quick wickets were lost. Dhoni only accelerated once the innings was already done and we were assured of victory Alos brilliant innings by dhoni but it was still only one match, Gambhir was good throughout
Yes and that's why Gambhir is ranked higher in the MVP list. The point is related to some folks saying Dhoni didn't do much ans simply hogged glory by remaining unbeaten at the end. We are simply saying that to shepherd a chase from 115/3 and take the team to 275 in a WC final is not really a walk in the park especially when Murali and Malinga had to be countered.
Posted
I dont get this Dhoni accelerated only after the innings was done.:haha: So the world cup final was already won with still 100 runs to chase.Amazing
I remember I was here spamming on match thread ,and saale sabki last 30 runs tak fatti huyi thi.Ab sabki zubaan khul gayi hai :hysterical:
Posted
I remember I was here spamming on match thread ' date='and [i']saale sabki last 30 runs tak fatti huyi thi.Ab sabki zubaan khul gayi hai :hysterical:
I still remember a match against SL where we could not chase 80 odd in last 15 overs even with 5-6 wickets remaining. One more wicket after Kohli and we would have been in trouble. Yuvraaj and Raina could have found Murli tough, both left handers against an off spinner.
Posted
Why were you people on ICF when the world cup was going on?
:confused:
I still remember a match against SL where we could not chase 80 odd in last 15 overs even with 5-6 wickets remaining. One more wicket after Kohli and we would have been in trouble. Yuvraaj and Raina could have found Murli tough' date=' both left handers against an off spinner.[/quote'] Yup, hindsight is 20-20. Now folks can come out and say "oh the match was already won before Dhoni started scoring quickly when only 100 runs were needed" and on the other hand we have so many matches which were lost from winning positions :facepalm:
Posted
:confused: Yup, hindsight is 20-20. Now folks can come out and say "oh the match was already won before Dhoni started scoring quickly when only 100 runs were needed" and on the other hand we have so many matches which were lost from winning positions :facepalm:
Muruli was not the bowler he was previously but dhoni record against srilankan bowlers gave me assurance that we would not lose the match.On that pitch first 15 overs were important.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...