Marut Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 Sreesanth at his best is equal to or better than Zaheer. But his best days are infrequent. I wish God had given him a bit more cricketing brain. I still remember the day he shot out South Africa for 80. Not too many Indian bowlers can do that even on their dream day. His work ethic is not bad and he puts it a lot of effort, but I really don't know what ails him. Maybe he is not getting the right guidance.
rkt.india Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 undoubtedly he is the most talented bowler that cricket has ever seen but the guy is so unlucky to be in a team where he wont get any support in the bowling department a champ like him will come back hard and will show the world who is the real fast bowler :cantstop:
Needforspeed Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 He doesn't look he has gained weight. His face looks a bit puffed up though. But that could be because his head is clean shaved.
trundlerNO1 Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 don't want this mediocre bowler playing for India again
T rex Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 don't want this mediocre bowler playing for India again who isn't a mediocre bowler in Indian team :((
shortbread Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 who isn't a mediocre bowler in Indian team :(( Calling any of them bar Yadav mediocre is a compliment!!
kubrickian Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 Sreesanth is a way better bowler than crap like Dinda.
SLICKR392 Posted February 10, 2013 Posted February 10, 2013 In the current pace attack Shree should not be rated as bad as he is. :giggle:
Hafeez Posted February 11, 2013 Posted February 11, 2013 Sreesnath age is 30 India should Look for new blood forget 30 plus fast bowlers like Zaheer,Sreesnath,Nahru,Balaji
Marut Posted February 11, 2013 Posted February 11, 2013 Sreesanth not Sreesnath. Experience is important, you need 30+ bowlers in your side, you can't have a team full of new blood. Sreesanth has another 4 years left if he gets into good form.
express bowling Posted February 11, 2013 Posted February 11, 2013 Sreesanth not Sreesnath. Experience is important' date=' you need 30+ bowlers in your side, you can't have a team full of new blood. Sreesanth has another 4 years left if he gets into good form.[/quote'] 30+ bowlers bring maturity, guidance etc. to the bowling attack. Does he ?
JaFanatic Posted February 11, 2013 Posted February 11, 2013 Sreesanth not Sreesnath. Experience is important' date=' you need 30+ bowlers in your side, you can't have a team full of new blood. Sreesanth has another 4 years left if he gets into good form.[/quote'] only sreeshanth fans can get such logics to include him in the side :cantstop:
T rex Posted February 11, 2013 Posted February 11, 2013 i think Sreesanth is better than Ishant and Dinda
Marut Posted February 11, 2013 Posted February 11, 2013 30+ bowlers bring maturity' date=' guidance etc. to the bowling attack. Does he ?[/quote'] So who else beings maturity and guidance? Sreesanth is not the ideal bowler to have in your team, but others are even worse. Ishant averages close to 40. After playing around 50 tests, Ishant recently delcared that he does not want to take on the mantle of leading our attack.
adi B Posted February 11, 2013 Posted February 11, 2013 i think Sreesanth is better than Ishant and Dinda :agree: so`s ur AV pic
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now