Jump to content

India is a "regressive" and "depressing" nation for women: Mallika Sherawat


Recommended Posts

Posted
I would say you are reading her statement based on your understanding of the issues. Mallika clearly states why India is regressive and why she is progressive and her definition of those terms. Now merely because the final conclusions might be same doesn't equate her opinion to your or mine.
Mate, I would like to know how she defines progressiveness. Her definition probably centres around the creative liberties and moral codes that are imposed on actors/actresses in Indian cinema. From what I gather, her selling point is that she showed a bit of skin when everyone else was doing PG - 13 movies. According to her, that makes her bold and courageous. I do not agree with that definition but whatever, to each his own.
Posted

War of words! Sherlyn Chopra, Poonam Pandey join the catfight over Incredible India http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/war-of-words-sherlyn-chopra-poonam-pandey-join-the-catfight-over-incredible-india/1/278203.html

After Bollywood diva Priyanka Chopra slammed Mallika Sherawat for calling India 'a regressive society', beauties like Sherlyn Chopra and Poonam Pandey have joined the war of words. Showing disapproval Sherlyn stated that she wouldn't be able to work in India had the society been regressive. Had India been "regressive" & "depressing", people such as myself would've been outta work..Why endorse a prejudicial opinion of INDIA???!!! â Sherlyn Chopra (@SherlynChopra) May 28, 2013 'Regressive'- Becoming less advanced.. 'Depressing'- Miserable dejection.. Are these the kind of adjectives that define today's INDIA???!!! â Sherlyn Chopra (@SherlynChopra) May 28, 2013 #MyIndia ain't perfect. Neither is any other nation across d globe. #MyIndia is progressin' with each passin' day!!! twitter.com/SherlynChopra/⦠â Sherlyn Chopra (@SherlynChopra) May 28, 2013 While, Poonam had a sarcastic tone! It was only due to the 'Regressive' India that Malika became a movie star â Poonam Pandey (@iPoonampandey) May 29, 2013 Malika should not bite the hand that has been feeding her. I love #India â Poonam Pandey (@iPoonampandey) May 29, 2013 Malika went to #Cannes and got carried away with the media attention.She's not used to it na... â Poonam Pandey (@iPoonampandey) May 29, 2013 Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/war-of-words-sherlyn-chopra-poonam-pandey-join-the-catfight-over-incredible-india/1/278203.html
:hysterical::hysterical: I agree with some of the opinions of Poonam Pandey.
Posted
She's speaking the near truth. Now her basis of reasons may be misplaced but it is the truth indeed.
If only it were that simple. Keep aside the fact that she may have uttered a half-truth ( which again, is very highly debatable), and scrutinize the context in which those comments were made. It was an interview about her upcoming movie, and based on whatever I've seen on YouTube or read in the e-media, she wasn't probed for her opinion on the state of women in India. She went down that route without any preamble, it seemed very premeditated, and made sweeping statements. It was shameless self flagellation solely for the purpose of staying relevant, and controversially contrarian. And staying relevant is something Bollywoodwalas are good at. Let me give you an example: On one of the threads that you open, say on some programming language, if I were to post in bold red with font size 50 " Sun rises in the East" , it is the truth. The absolute truth, unlike Mallika's 'truth' which is very debatable here. Would that make it right, though? It would just be a cheap ploy to get attention. It was no different here, and I'm afraid Mallika Sherawat has already succeeded. And using a social ill to score some brownie ( no pun intended) points among the gora crowd is a very despicable thing to do.
Posted
Let me give you an example: On one of the threads that you open, say on some programming language, if I were to post in bold red with font size 50 " Sun rises in the East" , it is the truth. The absolute truth, unlike Mallika's 'truth' which is very debatable here. Would that make it right, though? It would just be a cheap ploy to get attention. It was no different here, and I'm afraid Mallika Sherawat has already succeeded. And using a social ill to score some brownie ( no pun intended) points among the gora crowd is a very despicable thing to do.
NO, its relative. If you were to be on Venus, the sun would rise in the west. :beee:
Posted
This is a much better interview:
She seemed to have a difficult up brining of sorts, her strong opinions seem to stem from that. The part about her not having a godfather in Bollywood and struggling for the first few years by herself was especially interesting.
That is a lie it seems,
Sherawat went to school at Delhi Public School' date=' Mathura Road.[13'] She has obtained a degree in philosophy from Miranda House, Delhi University.[14] During the initial days of her career, she claimed to have come from a very conservative small town family, and that she faced many hurdles from her family in pursuing her career.[15] However, Mallika's family has refuted this as a story created by her to give her an aura of a small town rustic girl who made it big in Bollywood. It has been reported that she was married for a short while to a Jet Airways pilot Captain Karan Singh Gill.[12]
Mallika exposed: These are the true lies
Posted

Why are all these Talentless hacks like Mallika,Sonam Kapoor etc,invited to Cannes in the first place :confused:-It's sad if anyone thinks that these chicks represent Indian Film industry which is already a subject of ridicule leave alone give opinions about Social evils in India Aishwarya despite being a talentless hack herself atleast has built up a decent amount of filmography atleast quantitatively speaking.

Posted
If only it were that simple. Keep aside the fact that she may have uttered a half-truth ( which again, is very highly debatable), and scrutinize the context in which those comments were made. It was an interview about her upcoming movie, and based on whatever I've seen on YouTube or read in the e-media, she wasn't probed for her opinion on the state of women in India. She went down that route without any preamble, it seemed very premeditated, and made sweeping statements. It was shameless self flagellation solely for the purpose of staying relevant, and controversially contrarian. And staying relevant is something Bollywoodwalas are good at. Let me give you an example: On one of the threads that you open, say on some programming language, if I were to post in bold red with font size 50 " Sun rises in the East" , it is the truth. The absolute truth, unlike Mallika's 'truth' which is very debatable here. Would that make it right, though? It would just be a cheap ploy to get attention. It was no different here, and I'm afraid Mallika Sherawat has already succeeded. And using a social ill to score some brownie ( no pun intended) points among the gora crowd is a very despicable thing to do.
you could have given an example by commenting something about programming in this thread :).
Posted
Seems like she embellished the truth. Hardly a surprise in an industry where you lie, cheat and steal to get what you want.
kinda like what she tried to potray in this interview too. seems similar doesn't it, bring up something negative about india which everybody knows is true and then paint herself as its victim and survivor.
Posted

You always get a bad impression of people who use "I" a lot. Mallika is one of those, me this, me that. And the way she brought India into this was disgraceful

Posted
You always get a bad impression of people who use "I" a lot. Mallika is one of those' date=' me this, me that. And the way she brought India into this was disgraceful[/quote'] I totally agree. I mean, as I was saying and as I have always said, me myself couldn't have said it any better. My views has always been that those who excessively use the words 'I' or 'mine' or 'me/my' are likely to be egoistic self centered maniacs. That's what I feel as I have read the same in many books. Do you agree with my profound thoughts?
Posted
I totally agree. I mean' date=' as I was saying and as I have always said, me myself couldn't have said it any better. My views has always been that those who excessively use the words 'I' or 'mine' or 'me/my' are likely to be egoistic self centered maniacs. That's what I feel as I have read the same in many books. Do you agree with my profound thoughts?[/quote'] I don't agree. :headshake:
Posted
I don't agree. :headshake:
Why not? In interviews, the more a person uses "I" or me this or that, it results in failures and basically creates a bad impression. You can check that with any interviews. Arrogance is never good.
Posted
Why not? In interviews, the more a person uses "I" or me this or that, it results in failures and basically creates a bad impression. You can check that with any interviews. Arrogance is never good.
Missed the sarcasm.
×
×
  • Create New...