Jump to content

Team India - What's different this time?


Recommended Posts

Posted
This is Dhoni's team. Most senior player' date=' he can do what he wants. he doesn't have people like Sehwag/Gambhir feeling the greed for captaincy. He can pick who he wants, no groups in the team now.[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: So the only reason we lost 8-0 were senior players and groups. Shri Mahendar Singh Dhoni ji ki toh koi galti hi nahi thi
Posted
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: So the only reason we lost 8-0 were senior players and groups. Shri Mahendar Singh Dhoni ji ki toh koi galti hi nahi thi
Drawing conclusions out of nowhere :boring:
Posted
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: So the only reason we lost 8-0 were senior players and groups. Shri Mahendar Singh Dhoni ji ki toh koi galti hi nahi thi
its like what Kaangress says about Pappu - jeete toh Rahul Baba ki jai aur haare toh party organization ka failure :cantstop:
Posted
its like what Kaangress says about Pappu - jeete toh Rahul Baba ki jai aur haare toh party organization ka failure :cantstop:
True for ICF : Jeete to team aur players ki jai, haare toh Dhoni should be sacked ASAP
Posted

I think the main difference is openers, Dhawan is batting like Bradman and Rohit is also doin well ( I never thought i will ever say this for him:) ) They are followed up by Kohli / DK / Dhoni / Jadeja who are all in good form.... Our Middle order looks menacing after a good start, not sure how good they will be after lets say 30/2.......... However i still feel we need to something about our bowling in general and death bowling in particular.....

Posted

1.The odi bowling stocks are lowest in decades. 2.Players with no baggage of failures. 3.Flat Pitches and no swing. 4.Decent Captaincy.But it was criminal to take jadeja off in middle overs. All in all we have to keep in mind sa missed 4 regular players and wi is not a great odi side.

Posted
1.The odi bowling stocks are lowest in decades. 2.Players with no baggage of failures. 3.Flat Pitches and no swing. 4.Decent Captaincy.But it was criminal to take jadeja off in middle overs. All in all we have to keep in mind sa missed 4 regular players and wi is not a great odi side.
How's that relevant when we too have just 2 from the WC winning 11 playing here!
Posted
and how many teams have crossed 250 in this tournament? Or only those pitches india batted on were flat?
They are the same as the one everyone else played. Just that our batsmen showed more intent and came off. Sure couple of collapses in the warm ups. But middle order stepped up.
Posted
How's that relevant when we too have just 2 from the WC winning 11 playing here!
because our players were dropped or retired as they no tin form.Steyn,kallis,morkel,smith will make the sa 11 if they are fit or not resting.They almost chased down 330.
Posted
because our players were dropped or retired as they no tin form.Steyn' date='kallis,morkel,smith will make the sa 11[/quote'] So rather than playing down the good performance of Indian side by calling the opponents as weak, fair to say our replacements have grabbed their chances better than the replacements other teams have tried? For a change, a word of praise for the young team wouldn't do any harm :winky:
Posted
because our players were dropped or retired as they no tin form.Steyn' date='kallis,morkel,smith will make the sa 11[/quote'] Smith - what is so incredible about him? Mediocre records (avg of 38/SR of 81) as an ODI player. For the record, "dropped" Gambhir averages 39.6 at SR of 85. Kallis - averages 35 with the bat in the last 2.5 years (since beginning of 2011) at a SR of 77. Has played just 14 ODIs. For the record, in the same period, Sehwag averages 39 at SR of 114 from 23 matches. Tendulkar averages nearly 40 at SR of over 85 during the same period and has played more matches than Kallis. Also please note that SA has played about 40 games in the same period, so Kallis has been part of about 30-35% of that only. Steyn - With all due respect to him, never been an ODI great. He is undoubtedly the greatest bowler (in tests) atm, but ODIs have never been his forte really. Averages very close to 30 with the ball. And since beginning of 2012 (i.e last 1.5 yrs) he averages 39 with the ball in 14 ODIs. I give you Morkel though.
Posted

What I can think of is we are playing like a team instead of depending on individuals. This team looks more like the match-winning combinations that AUS and SL used to put out. That said, all teams in this tourney look pretty cr@p so far except England. So, a match against England would tell us how good we are.

Posted
Smith - what is so incredible about him? Mediocre records (avg of 38/SR of 81) as an ODI player. For the record, "dropped" Gambhir averages 39.6 at SR of 85. Kallis - averages 35 with the bat in the last 2.5 years (since beginning of 2011) at a SR of 77. Has played just 14 ODIs. For the record, in the same period, Sehwag averages 39 at SR of 114 from 23 matches. Tendulkar averages nearly 40 at SR of over 85 during the same period and has played more matches than Kallis. Also please note that SA has played about 40 games in the same period, so Kallis has been part of about 30-35% of that only. Steyn - With all due respect to him, never been an ODI great. He is undoubtedly the greatest bowler (in tests) atm, but ODIs have never been his forte really. Averages very close to 30 with the ball. And since beginning of 2012 (i.e last 1.5 yrs) he averages 39 with the ball in 14 ODIs. I give you Morkel though.
1.smith plays in sa so stats u mentioned are good. 2.kallis has been a very good bowler for sa and plays the anchor. 3.Steyn is anyday better than most sa bowlers. Sa with these three surely are stronger.
Posted
So rather than playing down the good performance of Indian side by calling the opponents as weak' date=' fair to say our replacements have grabbed their chances better than the replacements other teams have tried? For a change, a word of praise for the young team wouldn't do any harm :winky:[/quote'] Many are going overboard.Our bowling still is struggling .
Posted

Smith and kallis are way past their sell by dates in ODI..... Steyn is better than other SA bowlers but do not confuse Steyn the bowler in Tests and ODI's, more so against India..... Overall i think India still stood a very good chance of Beating SA with these three players..... P.S. i hope i have not jinxed my team for upcoming matches

Posted
1.smith plays in sa so stats u mentioned are good. 2.kallis has been a very good bowler for sa and plays the anchor. 3.Steyn is anyday better than most sa bowlers. Sa with these three surely are stronger.
1. Smith averages 31 in 44 ODIs in the last 3.5 years (2010 onwards). If 31 is a good enough average, then I have nothing more to say. 2. You don't get it, do you? The point is Kallis has played hardly 35% of the total matches SA has played in the last 2-3 years. It means SA aren't dependent on Kallis really. 3. Well, since 2012, Steyn ranks 5th in terms of wickets. He has the worst avg among all SA bowlers who have taken atleast 10 wickets. Even Klienveldt has a better avg than Steyn. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=2;spanmin1=01+Jan+2012;spanval1=span;team=3;template=results;type=bowling

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...