itduzz Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 Joint fastest with Waqar (10 Test matches):congrats:
beetle Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 Not till he apologises for the nandro thingyy. He is tainted. I am sorry ...
veer Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 congrates on your nandro filled 50 wickets.. :cantstop:
Cricketics Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 A.S.I.F ANOTHER SANKHI IDIOTIC FACKER if u find laslt word offensive then Another sankhi idiotic Failure
Gambit Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 Well done to him but he's tainted and should have been banned for life.
King Tendulkar Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 How many of those wickets were gained by the help of drugs?
bharat297 Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 he wont apologise. Has anyone who got away with something like that ever come back and apologised? But warne's career should be tainted too since he not only took a banned diuretic, but it was also a steroid "masking" agent so we will never completely know whether or not he took steroids to speed up his recovery in 2003 from injury. When warne clocked 700 this was never even mentioned.
Don Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 all his wickets shoudnt have counted in the first place. a black mark on cricket. A druggie. Period.
Holysmoke Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 he wont apologise. Has anyone who got away with something like that ever come back and apologised? But warne's career should be tainted too since he not only took a banned diuretic, but it was also a steroid "masking" agent so we will never completely know whether or not he took steroids to speed up his recovery in 2003 from injury. When warne clocked 700 this was never even mentioned. Warne was punished. This retard wasnt.
Guest dada_rocks Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 Yes strip him off 50% of wicktes for Naan consuption
itduzz Posted October 1, 2007 Author Posted October 1, 2007 How many of those wickets were gained by the help of drugs?none...drugs wont help u bowl emaculate line & length and move the ball off the seam both ways
Guest dada_rocks Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 none...drugs wont help u bowl emaculate line & length and move the ball off the seam both ways It does, once u get tired ur line and length goes haywire.. There is a big difference in keeping that intact for 25 over as opposed to 5 overs in a day's play.
Mr. Wicket Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 Fastest? http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/content/records/283528.html Rong.
Dravid Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 hmmm 50 wickets..thats too with drugs... whats the big deal? no need for this thread:finger:
The Outsider Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 Asif's career should be looked at : B.C. (Before Charas) A.D. (After drugs)
novpj Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 Fastest? http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/content/records/283528.html Rong. Dont blame you - you dont understand the alternate reality that Pakis live in where the whole world revolves around them. Its fastest for a Paki.
yoda Posted October 1, 2007 Posted October 1, 2007 Asif's career should be looked at : B.C. (Before Charas) A.D. (After drugs) :haha:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now