Raghav_12 Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 when did tendulkar shift to delhi ? :hmmm: Tendulkar trascends all these boundaries of Delhi, Mumbai, India, Pakistan, Australia, Botswana, Jamnagar etc.
Austin 3:!6 Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 Tendulkar trascends all these boundaries of Delhi' date=' Mumbai, India, Pakistan, Australia, [b']Botswana, Jamnagar etc. :cantstop:
Deleted_User_1 Posted October 2, 2013 Posted October 2, 2013 H needs to lift his ghagra down and call it a day....practiced for two hours for a duck. :facepalm:
TheWall Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 sachin should a century in the coming test series and put rest to all the wagging tongues...
rkt.india Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 sachin should a century in the coming test series and put rest to all the wagging tongues... Even Dravid and Laxman will score a century every 10-15 tests if you call them back out of retirement, but they cared for the team and hanged their boots at the right time while SRT loves only his love for cricket. He should himself realize that there is not much he can contribute to the team at this age since he has also not been scoring too many runs for last 2 years. He thinks he is still at the top of his game.
TheWall Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Even Dravid and Laxman will score a century every 10-15 tests if you call them back out of retirement' date=' but they cared for the team and hanged their boots at the right time while SRT loves only his love for cricket. He should himself realize that there is not much he can contribute to the team at this age since he has also not been scoring too many runs for last 2 years. He thinks he is still at the top of his game.[/quote'] if he doesn't score in the coming series, he should quit...
zubinpepsi Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 doesn't look he can score anything .. ducks seem to be coming naturally these days... should just quit and save the embarrasment..
CSK Fan Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Even Dravid and Laxman will score a century every 10-15 tests if you call them back out of retirement' date='[b'] but they cared for the team and hanged their boots at the right time while SRT loves only his love for cricket. He should himself realize that there is not much he can contribute to the team at this age since he has also not been scoring too many runs for last 2 years. He thinks he is still at the top of his game. err, how do you conclude that?
rkt.india Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 err' date=' how do you conclude that?[/quote'] Even a blind can see that. I cannot find any reason why he should continue to play for Indian team at this age though I agree it is his choice and it should be left on him to decide. Might be, I lack the wisdom and eyes to see what you can see.
CSK Fan Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Even a blind can see that. I cannot find any reason why he should continue to play for Indian team at this age though I agree it is his choice and it should be left on him to decide. Might be' date=' I lack the wisdom and eyes to see what you can see.[/quote'] I meant how did you conclude that Dravid and Laxman retired out of the goodness of their heart? They were never treated as royally as Sachin and I dont think they had much of a choice. Am pretty sure they might have continued more if given as much leeway as Sachin was
rkt.india Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 I meant how did you conclude that Dravid and Laxman retired out of the goodness of their heart? They were never treated as royally as Sachin and I dont think they had much of a choice. Am pretty sure they might have continued more if given as much leeway as Sachin was I doubt Dravid would have been dropped straight after Australia tour. He would certainly have played test series against NZ and he might have had a decent knock or two in that series as his form in India was always good and with those knocks he would certainly have played against England too. Dravid's form in India was never in question, neither was VVS'. They had scored a lot of runs in their previous series at home against WI, were top 2 run getters for India. Though I dont want him to retire after WI series. If he plays that series, he should play SA test series too.
vamos_rafa Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 I doubt Dravid would have been dropped straight after Australia tour. He would certainly have played test series against NZ and he might have had a decent knock or two in that series as his form in India was always good and with those knocks he would certainly have played against England too. Dravid's form in India was never in question, neither was VVS'. They had scored a lot of runs in their previous series at home against WI, were top 2 run getters for India. Though I dont want him to retire after WI series. If he plays that series, he should play SA test series too. Sir, barring the England and WI series, Dravid for the large part of 4 years was also a part of the team coz of his reputation. He had been very poor against almost all sides barring the SL even in India I am not saying that Sachin would come up with such performances at the age of 40, but to paint everyone else in a sacrosanct picture is also not done.
rkt.india Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Sir' date= barring the England and WI series, Dravid for the large part of 4 years was also a part of the team coz of his reputation. He had been very poor against almost all sides barring the SL even in India I am not saying that Sachin would come up with such performances at the age of 40, but to paint everyone else in a sacrosanct picture is also not done. I have mentioned the same so many times. Dravid averages around 40 after 2007 tour of England and to be fair, we did not see any replacement at that time and the blame goes to selectors to not be proactive. Right now, we have several players showing promise. Likes of Rohit has not played a test yet. Rahane got one test. I am not saying anyone was/is saint but at least, he understood and retired. SRT averaging 30 in last 2 years, cannot score even at home and those were wasted opportunities for the likes of Rohit and Rahane.
vamos_rafa Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 I have mentioned the same so many times. Dravid averages around 40 after 2007 tour of England and to be fair, we did not see any replacement at that time and the blame goes to selectors to not be proactive. Right now, we have several players showing promise. Likes of Rohit has not played a test yet. Rahane got one test. I am not saying anyone was/is saint but at least, he understood and retired. SRT averaging 30 in last 2 years, cannot score even at home and those were wasted opportunities for the likes of Rohit and Rahane. Please take out the SL series in 2009. His average would show you the actual picture. In hindsight, how do we know we didn't have any replacements? Rohit Sharma was always there in the reckoning. Badrinath was doing the rounds. I am not defending Sachin here. He should have retired long back. But, I agree with MTC.
maniac Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Maybe srt realizes how msd,don and their cronies are ruining indian cricket.....if he retires,they will walk all over everything. I mean c'mon jaddu and chawla walking into test squads over others,Raina ,vijay getting a test shot time and time again. Now I know jaddu has been doing well and so has vijay in the Aussie test series,but just because they have performed we can't overlook the fact how they got in the first place.
maniac Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Srt is like dritharashtra to dhoniyodhan and shrini mama :giggle:
Old guy Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Please take out the SL series in 2009. His average would show you the actual picture. In hindsight, how do we know we didn't have any replacements? Rohit Sharma was always there in the reckoning. Badrinath was doing the rounds. I am not defending Sachin here. He should have retired long back. But, I agree with MTC. why take it out ? also recent 15 tests give lot better indication than performance 2 years before infact in all away tours dravid did reasonably well to be persisted with yeah not at his best but there were good innings in between and current form of sachin is not comparable to that at all.
CSK Fan Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 I am not saying anyone was/is saint but at least, he understood and retired. Sorry, IMO he did not understand and retire. He was made to retire. My point is not that Dravid's form was worse than Sachin or not. Dravid and Laxman were never going to get the same leeway as Sachin. yeh sab understanding, retiring for the team, sab bolne ki batain hai. Mauka milta to inka bhi career prolong hota
CSK Fan Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 Sir, barring the England and WI series, Dravid for the large part of 4 years was also a part of the team coz of his reputation. He had been very poor against almost all sides barring the SL even in India I am not saying that Sachin would come up with such performances at the age of 40, but to paint everyone else in a sacrosanct picture is also not done. Particularly during 2010, Dravid had an awful patch while Sachin was in great nick. Yet there was no similar outpouring of hate for him. Dravid is the holy cow of this forum, the untouchable
CSK Fan Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 why take it out ? also recent 15 tests give lot better indication than performance 2 years before infact in all away tours dravid did reasonably well to be persisted with yeah not at his best but there were good innings in between and current form of sachin is not comparable to that at all.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now