Tailender Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Averages 36 with the ball in LOI :hysterical: WHERE IS IRFAN :(( WHERE IS GUL :((
Sarkar Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 but you guys have the best bowling attack in the world according to your country fans
Tailender Posted December 20, 2013 Author Posted December 20, 2013 like wtf is that action? His body is point at square leg, his arm is pointing towards third man and the ball is a long hop down leg. every bloody time.
Tailender Posted December 20, 2013 Author Posted December 20, 2013 but you guys have the best bowling attack in the world according to your country fans I think Pakistan has a very good attack if Irfan comes in for Tanvir. But "best" attack, it's not smart to put labels like that because it always backfires. But Pakistan attack is certainly up there I'd say.
Tailender Posted December 20, 2013 Author Posted December 20, 2013 Where is the Gul'dozer'? Gul dozer is busy getting figures of 10-6-12-6 in domestic cricket He failed a "fitness test"... How Tanvir passed, god knows... The guy is a travesty in the field.
game_changerr Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 where is aiyaz cheema??i think he is better dan bhatti....cheema would have destroyed lankan batting line up,,,,
badmash Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Pakistan will have a good lineup if tanvir does not play....EVER..he is only in due to Irfan being out.
vvvslaxman Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 I wouldn't say he is the worst. He did bring pakistan back in few games. With just 4 fielders outside you rely heavily on yorkers and decent pace. Any bowler can be hit around in this ODI era.
Tailender Posted December 20, 2013 Author Posted December 20, 2013 I wouldn't say he is the worst. He did bring pakistan back in few games. With just 4 fielders outside you rely heavily on yorkers and decent pace. Any bowler can be hit around in this ODI era. Junaid Khan has 66 wickets @ average of 22/SR of 27/ER 4.90 in 39 matches. Sohail Tanvir has 67 wickets @ average of 35/SR of 41/ER 5.20 in 58 matches. just plagiarized that fact. but you get the point... no way ANY ONE should be average 35 in LOI... I'd rather have Kohli bowl... his action is better anyways.
Old guy Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Junaid Khan has 66 wickets @ average of 22/SR of 27/ER 4.90 in 39 matches. Sohail Tanvir has 67 wickets @ average of 35/SR of 41/ER 5.20 in 58 matches. just plagiarized that fact. but you get the point... no way ANY ONE should be average 35 in LOI... I'd rather have Kohli bowl... his action is better anyways. Even he bowls off wrong foot
Cricketics Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 We have lot of bowlers in India who will give good fight to Tanveer along with full Bangladesh pace bowling attack.
vvvslaxman Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Junaid Khan has 66 wickets @ average of 22/SR of 27/ER 4.90 in 39 matches. Sohail Tanvir has 67 wickets @ average of 35/SR of 41/ER 5.20 in 58 matches. just plagiarized that fact. but you get the point... no way ANY ONE should be average 35 in LOI... I'd rather have Kohli bowl... his action is better anyways. Average shouldn't matter match. ER is fine. Having said with wrong foot action he is bowling lot of death overs. He is bound to go for lot of runs. At his pace they will target him. But he does have a deceptive slower ball and also slower yorker. Sure he is not as good as Junaid who offers a little bit of pace.
Asim Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Definitely one of the worst ever from Pak at least but his continuous selection is even more strange specially when we have so many other options available who can do much better than him (no thanks we dont need his additional batting talent)...
panther Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Easily Ishant sharma is worst along with the kumars, lakmals and the bangladeshi contingent. Tanvir is a world class t20 bowler but's that's it.
King Tendulkar Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Easily Ishant sharma is worst along with the kumars, lakmals and the bangladeshi contingent. Tanvir is a world class t20 bowler but's that's it. Well at least one brother likes him.:giggle:
Asim Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Even 34 year old Cheema was wayyyy better than Kukri in ALL formats... He was a genuine effort bowler who will give his best all day long and there was nothing wrong with his performance either.... In very short span he played, he had stats of: 7 Tests: 20 wkts @ 31.90 avg with 60.0 SR, OK he might required some improvement here but 14 ODIs: 23 wkts @ 25.7 avg with 28.6 SR and 5 T20Is: 8 wkts @ 14.50 avg with 12.7 SR I think both his ODIs and T20I stats were going quite impressive and he definitely deserved a place in team for much longer specially when you giving unlimited chances to Wahab and Tanvir etc...
Asim Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Easily Ishant sharma is worst along with the kumars, lakmals and the bangladeshi contingent. Tanvir is a world class t20 bowler but's that's it. Lets End his T20 speciality false-hype too, among all Pakistani T20 bowlers (lets say with 15+ matches n wickets) he has worst avg, (2nd)worst econ and worst SR...
panther Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Lets End his T20 speciality false-hype too, among all Pakistani T20 bowlers (lets say with 15+ matches n wickets) he has worst avg, (2nd)worst econ and worst SR... His last 10 matches in t20 has been top class, proven t20 hack across the globe.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now