Jump to content

India tour of New Zealand 2014


fineleg

India tour of New Zealand 2014  

  1. 1.

    • Yes. Dhoni had enough to him. Time to DUMP now.
      13
    • No Way.
      33


Recommended Posts

Posted

Ashwin averages nearly 40 in Test cricket. Dude can't bowl overseas, but he might do better at batting. Besides, Jaddu's bowling this series has been poor.

Posted
Ashwin averages nearly 40 in Test cricket. Dude can't bowl overseas' date=' but he might do better at batting. Besides, Jaddu's bowling this series has been poor.[/quote'] yeah but he did well in SA. might be we go back to Ashwin for England series.Both seem equal to me
Posted
Pulling of a heroic and fighting loss from a winning position all too familiar these days.
Seriously. It pisses me off how do we conjure up to get into such situations from absolute winning situations. It happened in SA and once again. I am pretty sure that bookies who had put money on SA and NZ at the end of first session of third day, would have made a killing both the times. I am putting no allegation here, just highlighting that how we are throwing away such strong positions with alarming regularity.
Posted
Seriously. It pisses me off how do we conjure up to get into such situations from absolute winning situations. It happened in SA and once again. I am pretty sure that bookies who had put money on SA and NZ at the end of first session of third day' date=' would have made a killing both the times. I am putting no allegation here, just highlighting that how we are throwing away such strong positions with alarming regularity.[/quote'] The second innings bowling seems to be the major problem,our four man bowling attack doesnt have the energy or skill to break a partnership once the batsman dig in. ofc add the terrible fielding,uninspired captaincy and we get to where we are.
Posted
Why would NZ declare and give India a chance to level the series ? I think India are gonna have to pick up 20 wickets before entertaining the notion of a chase.
NZ will at least let McCullum get 300, and I have a feeling they want to let Neesham get a ton or get out as well. That could be lunch. So lets say there is 65 overs left at lunch, bat 2 overs after so that is leaving 60 overs to bowl India out. That seems the most likely situation.
Posted
The second innings bowling seems to be the major problem,our four man bowling attack doesnt have the energy or skill to break a partnership once the batsman dig in. ofc add the terrible fielding,uninspired captaincy and we get to where we are.
For mine there is just a 'sameness' about the attack, all bowl 75-80mph (120-135km), straight up and down. Every good attack has an outright quick, usually 2. Australia has 2 in Harris and Mitch, SA has 2 in Steyn and Morkel. India has who? Sharmi really only nudges 140kmph. You probably need Yadav out there. Helps a side to genuinely blast out the tail with a quick bowler.
Posted
are you accounting for continuous improvement of Indian side in making this prediction?
Tough? U-G, watch day 5 and how the NZ seamers unravel the India pack of cards
If NZ bat for another 10 odd overs and 2 overs are lost for change in innings it leaves barely 75 overs to bat through. The pitch hasn't deteriorated to such an extent for us to be bowled out but yeah it can always happen. If NZ had put us in to bat tomight for a few overs with around 300 odd to get, I'm certain we would have lost a couple of wkts as we were on the field for more than 2 days. Now it's less than a day to negotiate but it doesn't really matter coz we are losing the series anyway. Whether we lose it 0-1 or 0-2 is immaterial.
Posted

^ Harris is quick, but not an outright quick. He's about 3-4 kmph faster than Siddle. But I agree that we need variety. Need someone like Vaas who might bowl slow but can swing and control the ball at will, an outright pacer who is encouraged to pick up wickets, and someone who can offer something diff - perhaps bounce, reverse swing, etc. And more imp, we need an allrounder because a 4 bowler attack won't work.

Posted
^ Harris is quick' date=' but not an outright quick. He's about 3-4 kmph faster than Siddle. But I agree that we need variety. Need someone like Vaas who might bowl slow but can swing and control the ball at will, an outright pacer who is encouraged to pick up wickets, and someone who can offer something diff - perhaps bounce, reverse swing, etc. And more imp, we need an allrounder because a 4 bowler attack won't work.[/quote'] Harris gets it up to 145-147kmph, that is pretty quick, that is 90mph. Siddle is much slower, 136-138kmph. Has changed his bowling to be a lot more accurate. You need an outright quick OR a Trent Boult type a genuine swing bowler. At the moment you have 3 meduim fast seam bowlers, there is no variety, and then you make it worse when your spinner is ordinary too. Makes it hard.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...