Magneto Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 i think he has played 6-7 finals' date='thats a poor record tbh[/quote'] But Kohli's 43 won us the ICC Trophy, so that is as good as a 100. Cricket fans get drawn into the quagmire of stupid stats ( Like since India didn't win when Sachin scored a 100, Sachin is not a match-winner and such nonsense) and ignore real contributions and eventually the real truth.
velu Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 MTC was waiting for years to post this and now he got his chance :giggle:
Magneto Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 +1 Rohit > Kohli. Rohit's test average is 66, much better than Kohli. In ODIs Rohit has also scored big knocks in difficult batting conditions against Australia at home while Kohli is a FTB who is cashing in on familiar conditions in New Zealand On ICF, no one understands your sarcasm anymore :finger: Serves you right
ganeshran Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 On ICF, no one understands your sarcasm anymore :finger: Serves you right What sarcasm? :dontknow: I'm 100% serious. Rohit is a match winner, Kohli isnt :finger: We won the series against Windies when Rohit scored big but lost against SA when Kohli scored runs. Kohli's runs aren't helping the team
Magneto Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 What sarcasm? :dontknow: I'm 100% serious. Rohit is a match winner, Kohli isnt :finger: We won the series against Windies when Rohit scored big but lost against SA when Kohli scored runs. Kohli's runs aren't helping the team Kohli didn't score any runs in the SA ODI series :finger:
Zero_Unit Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 Be realistic about match winning knocks. You cant be expectinf him to score 150+ in each match chasing scores like 300 ish while others contributes peanuts. Even when he scores a 100, other still fails. To be a match winner, you need some sorte of contribution from your team mates. After all, there is no I in team!
Laaloo Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 The RAT just doesn't have it in him to step up on the biggest stage. Can't blame him.
Cricketics Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 It took Kohli one world cup to win the world cup for INdia. He is what we say a "good thing" to have happend to INdian Luck, and a great thing to have happend to INdian Cricket team as a player.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now