FischerTal Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 Srini needs to feck off, Rahane would have been saved by DRS, same thing with Vijay
maniac Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 Disgusting desicion.....Steve Davies not the first time he has hurt India :mad:
Deleted_User_1 Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 India deserves all the poor decisions!!! Fecking BCCI and Jharkhandi do not want UDRS.....
Trichromatic Posted February 9, 2014 Author Posted February 9, 2014 Almost every Indian series ends with 4-5 wrong decisions these days.
Indya_Rocks Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 Davies being biased, lets finish him like we being doing to Bucknor.
Number Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 Human errors are acceptable but technical ones not. Brace yourself Srini fanboys brigade is on its way. :giggle:
gaurav92 Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 India deserves all the poor decisions!!! Fecking BCCI and Jharkhandi do not want UDRS..... +1. And we don't cry when decision go in our favour, do we? So its all in the balance, wrong decision are part and parcel of the game, and if you don't take DRS, this is what you deserve.
~ Miss Warner ~ Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 BCCI are the ones who dont want DRS, so they have to live with bad calls when they happen.
maniac Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 Human errors are acceptable but technical ones not. Brace yourself Srini fanboys brigade is on its way. :giggle: It's not Srinis personal agenda against DRS,Lot of Business logic behind it :beee:
Trichromatic Posted February 9, 2014 Author Posted February 9, 2014 DRS or no DRS, it's such a shame that howlers are still part of the game. While third umpires spend lot of time for one unclear boundary, howlers (LBW and caught) are easily accepted.
Tailender Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 +1. And we don't cry when decision go in our favour' date=' do we? So its all in the balance, wrong decision are part and parcel of the game, and if you don't take DRS, this is what you deserve.[/quote'] well said, and also my respect for Rahane skyrocketed. Didn't make a fuss out of it, not even a little bit of dissent :hatsoff:
Akash_Cric Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 Davies being biased' date=' lets finish him like we being doing to Bucknor.[/quote'] What is this Pathetic our people are so stupid, that why we are virtual minnows despite being the "Big 1"
maniac Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 What is this Pathetic our people are so stupid, that why we are virtual minnows despite being the "Big 1" The guy is a Paki
BlueBee Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 India deserves all the poor decisions!!! Fecking BCCI and Jharkhandi do not want UDRS..... :hmmm:
gattaca Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 What is this Pathetic our people are so stupid, that why we are virtual minnows despite being the "Big 1" He is a paki he is damaged goods
gaurav92 Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 DRS or no DRS' date=' it's such a shame that howlers are still part of the game. While third umpires spend lot of time for one unclear boundary, howlers (LBW and caught) are easily accepted.[/quote'] Yes, thats because DRS is there to overturn a decision. If you don't want it, accept the decision that come your way and don't cry about it. Wrong decisions will happen amidst some brilliant decisions, human error. When you see an umpire handing it to the third umpire for a 4, or a six, or a run out, he did not see it clearly as it was far/fast. But in case of LBW, caught behind, he has seen it dead straight in front of him. He expects to give a decision on those. If you feel he must confirm his decisions with the third umpire, why have the on field umpire then at the first place? Go for Technology and let the third umpire make the decision and the on field umpire is only an on field spectator.
gaurav92 Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 well said' date=' and also my respect for Rahane skyrocketed. Didn't make a fuss out of it, not even a little bit of dissent :hatsoff:[/quote'] Rahane generally is calm, ha it been a Kohli he would have definitely mouthed a few towards the umpire. He stared at him even after he clearly got a glove at the ball in the first innings :cantstop: He is very passionate about his batting, just doesn't want to get out :D
maniac Posted February 9, 2014 Posted February 9, 2014 Yes, thats because DRS is there to overturn a decision. If you don't want it, accept the decision that come your way and don't cry about it. Wrong decisions will happen amidst some brilliant decisions, human error. When you see an umpire handing it to the third umpire for a 4, or a six, or a run out, he did not see it clearly as it was far/fast. But in case of LBW, caught behind, he has seen it dead straight in front of him. He expects to give a decision on those. If you feel he must confirm his decisions with the third umpire, why have the on field umpire then at the first place? Go for Technology and let the third umpire make the decision and the on field umpire is only an on field spectator. Once again DRS has not guaranteed a Error-free series till date....S*** happens unfortunately we were on the receiving end thats it. BCCI has said that they will embrace it once the flaws are rectified.They also prefer Hawk-eye over the UDRS If I am not mistaken
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now