Raghav_12 Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 I said it.. I also said that you cant discount that possibility I believe there was some kind of manipulations in BJP run states. MP, Rajsthan and Gujrat. Without state manipulation, such results wouldn't have been possible. I have no proofs but this is definitely distinct possibility.
rkt.india Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 naresh fernandes @tajmahalfoxtrot 2m In Mumbai North West, Rakhi Sawant has got 58 votes
JaiRamesh2 Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 Please switch to Times Now to watch Jha's face. Defending Pappu till death
game_changerr Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 I believe there was some kind of manipulations in BJP run states. MP' date=' Rajsthan and Gujrat. Without state manipulation, such results wouldn't have been possible. I have no proofs but this is definitely distinct possibility.[/quote'] tu pravakta ban ja
rkt.india Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 Vikrant Gupta AajTak @vikrantgupta73 51s Chandigarh for BJP, Mandi for BJP, Gurgaon for BJP, Delhi's 7 for BJP and in my only other seat Amritsar, Arun Jaitely reducing Capt's lead
diga Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 In Mumbai North West, Rakhi Sawant has got 58 votes Did Mariyam aunty vote for her?
SLICKR392 Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 I believe there was some kind of manipulations in BJP run states. MP' date=' Rajsthan and Gujrat. Without state manipulation, such results wouldn't have been possible. I have no proofs but this is definitely distinct possibility.[/quote'] Since you have no proof, why make this statement?
FischerTal Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 I believe there was some kind of manipulations in BJP run states. MP' date=' Rajsthan and Gujrat. Without state manipulation, such results wouldn't have been possible. I have no proofs but this is definitely distinct possibility.[/quote'] God....
Raghav_12 Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 tu pravakta ban ja lol.. talking in Modi style. Something we shld get used to for next 5 years.
Raghav_12 Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 Since you have no proof' date=' why make this statement?[/quote'] I am just saying it is distinct possibility as EVM manipulation was distinct possibility.
undisputed chap Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 So kejri was successful in anhilating con party
game_changerr Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 lol.. talking in Modi style. Something we shld get used to for next 5 years. :haha:
diga Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 I am just saying it is distinct possibility as EVM manipulation was distinct possibility. all you need is to flip the MSB of the vote numbers for each candidate .. 1 bit manipulation can do the trick
fedex Posted May 16, 2014 Posted May 16, 2014 http://eciresults.nic.in/ConstituencywiseS2437.htm?ac=37
Recommended Posts