Desi Cartman Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 Yes' date=' allow him to keep warm the PM seat for few years... for Kejriwal... :giggle:[/quote'] Sssh :secret:
Sachin=GOD Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 Mohan Bhagwat emphasised on the need to bring about “uniformity” in the country and the role of Hindutva in achieving that purpose. “Ek bhasha, ek devta, ek sampraday banana hoga ( We need to ensure one language, one God and one religion),” he said elaborating on his larger point that “for unity we need uniformity”. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/india-is-a-hindu-rashtra-bhagwat/article6872230.ece The last time I heard a phrase like "one language, one religion, one God, one nation" was from Erodgen of Turkey.
bulbul Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/india-is-a-hindu-rashtra-bhagwat/article6872230.ece The last time I heard a phrase like "one language, one religion, one God, one nation" was from Erodgen of Turkey. Last time i heard Mohan bhagwat was not in Government :hmmmm2:
diga Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 GDP base year change results in higher GDP numbers ... dont like this one wee bit
Raghav_12 Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 Last time i heard Mohan bhagwat was not in Government :hmmmm2: It's rather other way.. govt is just one part of Mohan Bhagwat.
Malcolm Merlyn Posted February 9, 2015 Posted February 9, 2015 It's rather other way.. govt is just one part of Mohan Bhagwat. Another piece of misinformation Chaddha ji.
The Outsider Posted February 10, 2015 Posted February 10, 2015 What is this approximation that you are using? From the census 2001 data the overall sex ratio (per 1000 males) for Muslims is 936 vs 931 for Hindus. Are you using the same figure for the 20-40 age group? If we do so, the difference between sex ratios is around 0.5%. A rough calculation shows that if Hindus had the same sex ratio as Muslims, all other things remaining the same their population growth rate would increase by a factor of 0.5%. Thus, instead of 14.5% decadal growth (2001-11), Hindus would have 14.5% X(1.005) = 14.5725%. This is a miniscule change, and almost nothing compared to the chasm with the Muslim decadal growth rate which stands at 24%. No, misconstrued post #1491. From my viewpoint TFR is the driving factor behind population growth rate in India, so I thought you were implying that sex ratio affects it somehow. I am using the weighted mean of the sex ratio at birth and the overall sex ratio. My back of the envelope calculation tells me it's around a 10% figure towards the overall numbers. Significant or not is subjective. For future projections, I am using the rate of decline between 1991 - 2011, weighted more towards recent data.
The Outsider Posted February 10, 2015 Posted February 10, 2015 BTW, here is an article from Surjeet Bhalla. He has been a Modi supporter throughout and though my political views are divergent from his, he is an extremely smart individual on the economic front. He is too much of a free market person but does at least attempt to package his thoughts holistically. The notion that it is sickulars/AAPturds alleging the religious instability the country is being driven to is false. http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/no-proof-required-dilli-ko-gussa-kyon-ayaa/
seedhi Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 I am using the weighted mean of the sex ratio at birth and the overall sex ratio. My back of the envelope calculation tells me it's around a 10% figure towards the overall numbers. Significant or not is subjective. For future projections, I am using the rate of decline between 1991 - 2011, weighted more towards recent data.Please give us those calculations and the source for your figures.
seedhi Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 I am using the weighted mean of the sex ratio at birth and the overall sex ratio. My back of the envelope calculation tells me it's around a 10% figure towards the overall numbers. Significant or not is subjective. For future projections, I am using the rate of decline between 1991 - 2011, weighted more towards recent data.Ok so I found the 2001 figures here http://www.iamrindia.gov.in/ihdr_book.pdf . So I will show my rough calculation using your approximation, I will use the average for the weighted mean. Sex ratio at birth: Hindus 901, Muslims 931. Overall sex ratio : Hindus 931, Muslims 936. Average: Hindus, 916, Muslims 933.5. Difference = 17.5. Normalized: 17.5/916, roughly 1.9%. Therefore, all other things remaining the same, if Hindus had the same sex ratio profile as Muslims, the Hindu decadal growth (2001-11) would be 14.5% X (1.019) = 14.7755%. Nowhere close to the Muslim decadal growth of 24%. IMO an insignificant change in that sense. From dispassionate pov - the argument that increase in population growth can be effected by increasing the sex ratio is as logical as saying that population control can be ensured by decreasing the sex ratio. Just like the latter won't make sense to any one interested in population control, the former won't appeal to those interested in population growth.
seedhi Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 BTW, here is an article from Surjeet Bhalla. He has been a Modi supporter throughout and though my political views are divergent from his, he is an extremely smart individual on the economic front. He is too much of a free market person but does at least attempt to package his thoughts holistically. The notion that it is sickulars/AAPturds alleging the religious instability the country is being driven to is false. http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/no-proof-required-dilli-ko-gussa-kyon-ayaa/I don't really go that much by name or affiliation of people. Bhalla usually deals in figures. Unfortunately the article is devoid of any data or statistics in support of his hypothesis that the country is in more communal strife since May 2014.
randomGuy Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 A ray of hope is that among the 12 year olds who r the child bearers of future, literacy rate is high at 95%. So may not see high growth rate of Muslims. Its up to the Hindus now to sustain TFR of 2. This will be a challenge in times to come
ravishingravi Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 Raghav Bhai. What the hell is happening under BJP raaj ? You are being allowed to post and AAP allowed to win. This isn't the ache din we anticipated.
seedhi Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 A ray of hope is that among the 12 year olds who r the child bearers of future' date=' [b']literacy rate is high at 95%. So may not see high growth rate of Muslims. Its up to the Hindus now to sustain TFR of 2. This will be a challenge in times to comeIn Kerala the literacy rate is 100% but there is still a big gap in the growth rates of Hindus and Muslims.
randomGuy Posted February 11, 2015 Posted February 11, 2015 In Kerala the literacy rate is 100% but there is still a big gap in the growth rates of Hindus and Muslims. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/South-India-lags-behind-national-fertility-rate-slows-population-boom/articleshow/19249154.cms Like I said, Hindus sustaining TFR of 2 will be a big challenge in future
Yoda-esque Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 Visa on arrival: Over 400% jump in tourist arrival in December'14 http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Visa-on-arrival-Over-400-jump-in-tourist-arrival-in-December14/articleshow/46277193.cms?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=TOIIndiaNews
Yoda-esque Posted February 18, 2015 Posted February 18, 2015 Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan: Government builds 7.1 lakh toilets in January
Recommended Posts