velu Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 Would have won in 4 days if dada was skipper we would have won in 3 days if all our players are angry like you :P
Crookbond Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 Would have won in 4 days if dada was skipper Dad would never pick a left arm spinner forget a Jadeja! :giggle:
gattaca Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 Dad would never pick a left arm spinner forget a Jadeja! :giggle: He still makes fun of jaddu when someone brings his two triples in ranji.
Crookbond Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 the_topspin: Suspect what will happen with ICC hearing is that Jadeja's case will be heard before Third Test, Anderson's after it...
zep1706 Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Jimmy Anderson's case to be heard via videoconference (think that means Skype) on Friday August 1 - day after third Test is due to end https://twitter.com/the_topspin/status/491547400193200128
StriKe Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 richard hobson @richardjhobson · 59m ICC confirm Jimmy Anderson's charge can be downgraded from a Level 3 offence. So potentially he could be fined, but not banned.
zep1706 Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 richard hobson @richardjhobson · 59m ICC confirm Jimmy Anderson's charge can be downgraded from a Level 3 offence. So potentially he could be fined, but not banned. Probably they would cite lack of evidence. That is why video evidence was necessary, which was suppressed by ECB.
Sachinism Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Hopefully gets done with A.S.A.P. - I'm sure Jimmy made contact, but doubt it was severe. Jadeja slapped him out of the attack the other day is a good a response as required
Sachin=GOD Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 Jadeja fined 50% of match fee over fracas Ravindra Jadeja has been found guilty of acting “contrary to the spirit of the game”, a level 1 offence under the ICC Code of Conduct for Players, for his role in the altercation with James Anderson during the second day of the first Test against England at Trent Bridge on July 10. He was found not guilty of the original charge England had levelled against him, that he “turned suddenly and took steps towards Anderson in an aggressive and threatening manner” after the players walked into the pavilion during lunch on day two. David Boon, the ICC match referee, presided over the hearing on Thursday (July 24) evening in Southampton, where the teams will play the third Test from July 27. It was attended by both players, their legal counsels and witnesses, as well as MV Sridhar of the Board of Control for Cricket in India, Phil Neale and Paul Downton of the England and Wales Cricket Board, and the ICC’s Ethics and Regulatory lawyer. http://www.wisdenindia.com/cricket-news/jadeja-fined-50-match-fee-fracas/117944
kubrickian Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 Jadeja fined 50% of match fee over fracas http://www.wisdenindia.com/cricket-news/jadeja-fined-50-match-fee-fracas/117944 That's so bizarre. So Anderson starts the fight, sledges Jadeja and pushes him and yet its Jadeja who gets fined ?
saneindian Posted July 25, 2014 Author Posted July 25, 2014 Anderson will probably be let off with a heavy fine and a likely suspended ban.
Sachin=GOD Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 That's so bizarre. So Anderson starts the fight' date=' sledges Jadeja and pushes him and yet its Jadeja who gets fined ?[/quote'] Anderson's hearing will take place after the 3rd test ends.
BeautifulGame Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 That's so bizarre. So Anderson starts the fight' date=' sledges Jadeja and pushes him and yet its Jadeja who gets fined ?[/quote'] Anderson's hearing not yet started. So if Jadeja is found guilty one would assume Anderson would be too
BlueBee Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 Jadeja fined 50% of match fee over fracas http://www.wisdenindia.com/cricket-news/jadeja-fined-50-match-fee-fracas/117944 Anderson's walking on thin ice. He should know ICC chairman is an Indian. We've Veto power. :hatsoff:
Sachin=GOD Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 CricketNDTV @CricketNDTV BCCI refuses to accept ICC decision to fine Ravindra Jadeja for Anderson brawl. Will appeal verdict.
BlueBee Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 CricketNDTV @CricketNDTV BCCI refuses to accept ICC decision to fine Ravindra Jadeja for Anderson brawl. Will appeal verdict. Veto power :haha: :bandit:
Sachin=GOD Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 Veto power :haha: :bandit: Not really. In these kinds of decisions there is almost always an option to appeal - and by the looks of things, BCCI will use that option to appeal.
velu Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 CricketNDTV @CricketNDTV BCCI refuses to accept ICC decision to fine Ravindra Jadeja for Anderson brawl. Will appeal verdict. :bandit:
mishra Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 Jadeja has been fined while charges where brought against him later. Also doesn't it make the Jadeja's case against Anderson weaker?
velu Posted July 25, 2014 Posted July 25, 2014 Jadeja has been fined while charges where brought against him later. Also doesn't it make the Jadeja's case against Anderson weaker? yeah .. if the victim is fined 50% of the match fee , then probably the culprit might have done something really sever
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now