virufan Posted July 28, 2014 Author Posted July 28, 2014 What a catch by Jadeja! The catch that Jadeja took off Shami was fantastic. Nobody is appreciating it. It was on his right side and for a left hander, it is a tough one. See how shoddy our slip fielding was other than this one. It was a saving grace that Sir was in the slip, where he is not generally positioned.
velu Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 another kewl strategy from our kewl kaptain.. :giggle: root totally got confused and thrown his wicket away ..
Stuge Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 We did not win the series in England under Dravid. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_cricket_team_in_England_in_2007
jusarrived Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 Make things happen with these set of bowlers ? you need a magician not a captain with these guys.
CSK Fan Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 Make things happen with these set of bowlers ? you need a magician not a captain with these guys. Yes please blame the bowlers. No bowlers in the world, not even Steyn does these 3 matches in a row. These same bowlers won you a match and drew another But lets blame rookie bowlers with hardly 20 match experience between them because that is the right thing to do Not a murmur about picking 4 bowlers on this track. Not a murmur about not selecting Ashwin on this wicket. Not a murmur about field placements and strategies of bowling one side of the wicket No sir, lets blame the easiest target, new rookie bowlers who are trying their best on a flat pitch
velu Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 Yes please blame the bowlers. No bowlers in the world, not even Steyn does these 3 matches in a row. These same bowlers won you a match and drew another But lets blame rookie bowlers with hardly 20 match experience between them because that is the right thing to do Not a murmur about picking 4 bowlers on this track. Not a murmur about not selecting Ashwin on this wicket. Not a murmur about field placements and strategies of bowling one side of the wicket No sir, lets blame the easiest target, new rookie bowlers who are trying their best on a flat pitch if the pitch is even more flatter , can we go with 6 bowlers ?? :hmmm:
CSK Fan Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 if the pitch is even more flatter ' date=' can we go with 6 bowlers ?? :hmmm:[/quote'] Post something relevant please instead of going on a tangent. Each and every commentator was saying the same thing. What is the point of a captain at all if such decisions don't need to be taken? For the toss?
adi B Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 Make things happen with these set of bowlers ? you need a magician not a captain with these guys. At least watch the match.he bowled 22 ovrs by jadeja with negative fields and told him to bowl leg side almost all the time ,thats how u pick wkts? Now you'll say he has no choice because he just has 3 pacers,so why play just 3.5 bowlers on a flat pitch in the first instance?
velu Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 Post something relevant please instead of going on a tangent. Each and every commentator was saying the same thing. What is the point of a captain at all if such decisions don't need to be taken? For the toss? can you explain how my post is not relevant ?? quoting ur own post .. Not a murmur about picking 4 bowlers on this track. Not a murmur about not selecting Ashwin on this wicket. Not a murmur about field placements and strategies of bowling one side of the wicket :sherlock:
CSK Fan Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 can you explain how my post is not relevant ?? quoting ur own post .. :sherlock: See, this is what I speak about your being just a troll. You see the poster name and post non-nonsensical one liners. Instead of replying why 5 bowlers is not a good idea, you make a completely moronic point about 6 bowlers. Why not 10 bowlers? ou add absolutely no value to any discussion whatsoever
velu Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 See' date=' this is what I speak about your being just a troll. You see the poster name and post non-nonsensical one liners. Instead of replying why 5 bowlers is not a good idea, you make a completely moronic point about 6 bowlers. Why not 10 bowlers? ou add absolutely no value to any discussion whatsoever[/quote'] MTC logic can be countered by the same stupid MTC logic .. if the pitch is flat how does having one additional bowler helps .. only addition can be ashwin and his record overseas is well documented.. so i put it lightly to you lightly otherwise you might end up crying.. if you cant relate this simple logic then i cant help you .. and sorry to burst the balloon , if you think that you can add value to any argument by using the so called MTC logic , then all the best for the laughs .. PS:- I dont like name calling , but i dont mind countering it.
Old guy Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 MTC logic can be countered by the same stupid MTC logic .. if the pitch is flat how does having one additional bowler helps .. only addition can be ashwin and his record overseas is well documented.. so i put it lightly to you lightly otherwise you might end up crying.. if you cant relate this simple logic then i cant help you .. and sorry to burst the balloon , if you think that you can add value to any argument by using the so called MTC logic , then all the best for the laughs .. PS:- I dont like name calling , but i dont mind countering it. i dont see any logic here :headshake:
BlueBee Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 Cool mod merging the poster's all stupid threads here. :giggle:
velu Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 i dont see any logic here :headshake: they had seen some logic , that y they went with 4 bowlers .. IMO its quite a lame argument to say that going for 5 bowlers if the pitch is flat.. i am not disputing the 4 or 5 bowler theory .. i asked a simple question .. if pitch is really flat then can we go with 6 bowlers ? :cantstop:
velu Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 Cool mod merging the poster's all stupid threads here. :giggle: time to merge all the anti-dhoni threads :giggle:
Old guy Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 they had seen some logic , that y they went with 4 bowlers .. IMO its quite a lame argument to say that going for 5 bowlers if the pitch is flat.. i am not disputing the 4 or 5 bowler theory .. i asked a simple question .. if pitch is really flat then can we go with 6 bowlers ? :cantstop: no 6 bowlers will lead to under bowling of everyone while 5 will save bowlers from over bowling see in india ball spins from day one so spinners can bowl most overs so we are ok with 4 bowlers but here quick bowlers have to do 90 percent of bowling in first inning and if pitch is flat they wll mostly bowl over 100 overs very time or even 120 overs so that means each of them is bowling around 30 overs or even more and that is one inning and same will happen in second inning so 50 overs per game with 3 quicks and also they get tired quickly and lose effectiveness ..
velu Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 no 6 bowlers will lead to under bowling of everyone while 5 will save bowlers from over bowling see in india ball spins from day one so spinners can bowl most overs so we are ok with 4 bowlers but here quick bowlers have to do 90 percent of bowling in first inning and if pitch is flat they wll mostly bowl over 100 overs very time or even 120 overs so that means each of them is bowling around 30 overs or even more and that is one inning and same will happen in second inning so 50 overs per game with 3 quicks and also they get tired quickly and lose effectiveness .. that why we have a containing spinner .. he bowled 1/4th and we got part timers too..
Old guy Posted July 28, 2014 Posted July 28, 2014 that why we have a containing spinner .. he bowled 1/4th and we got part timers too.. still all quicks bowled over 30 overs and no other team in world today goes with just 3 quicks in outside sub continent even dhoni agreed with this strategy in first 2 games even though he did not bowl binny ..soluton was to replace binny with bowler who dhoni trusts ...but opposite happened :cantstop:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now