Crookbond Posted August 19, 2014 Posted August 19, 2014 What a strange post. I don't see any connection between what you posted (dummy candidates) and Amit Shah. You are trying to pass off an insinuation as fact. Check your own old posts to see what that makes you according to yourself. I just posted an interview of Amit Shah and his response to a legitimate question. I was merely talking about Amit Shah's prowess as a great orator. Apart from you, everyone knows that Amit Shah means there. Even some of your own party supporters gloat over this but well now that you are aware of the hand - you will play the "Oh! I don't see any wrong there" card.
seedhi Posted August 19, 2014 Posted August 19, 2014 I just posted an interview of Amit Shah and his response to a legitimate question. I was merely talking about Amit Shah's prowess as a great orator. Glad that we are on the same page on this one. Amit Shah is indeed a great asset. Apart from you, everyone knows that Amit Shah means there. Even some of your own party supporters gloat over this but well now that you are aware of the hand - you will play the "Oh! I don't see any wrong there" card.No idea what you are talking about here.
The Outsider Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 http://www.outlookindia.com/article/Numerocracy/291679 I hope BJP officially apologises for Ramesh Bidhuri's remarks LOL! Why would they apologize for their agenda?
PBN Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 Unfortunate series of events. How exactly are the BJP to be blamed for? Any specifics? Did BJP incite the local muslim population?
Khalpat Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 And since you are a knowledge of "how politics work", I want to see you say it with a straight face that Amit Shah won't indulge in any of such non-sense in the future. Here's an example of Amit Shah's prowess Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/rahul-kanwal-on-the-man-behind-the-reputation-amit-shah-bjp/1/372933.html I'm sure we need such people more in politics because well "that's how politics works". Your posts and your brain are much much better than this. The "this is how politics work" is a classic fallacy. It doesn't depend on who Raghav_12 supports or who I support. Call the crooks out, at least on an anonymous forum. I am sorry DM but I am not able to understand what exactly you are trying to say through this post. With Modi there were more than 8 people contesting with similar name Narendra Modi and similar to lotus symbol. In Gorakhpur there were 3 yogi's stood for confusing the voters but atlast people of India and electorate are not so stupid , these kind of tricks which is been done from 1970's Indira era makes difference if there is a close fight between contestants. Unfortunately this time the fight was not a close one anywhere. DM, from my personal experience I can say most of the thing in our life moves on with the word perception. Its very tough to break the perception once when it has been created, example Dravid is considered a slow batsman and Ganguly is considered as aggresive batsman of their time yet they have same strike rate in ODI. Which actually means truth is niether the perception nor the statistics the actual truth is somewere in between. Politics also works in the same way, create a perception among people. "Rahul Gandhi is an idiot" perception has been created and it will not get fade away easily. May be the actual truth could be he is not. Who knows. Similarly it is for Amit Shah, Narendra Modi etc. When Mr Modi became the PM, the biggest perception he needed to break was of an aggressive, right wing Macho man image. How could he break it? Similar to how Vajpayee did, bring a person closer to you who has more shady image than PM himself which will dilute the image of Modi. Now Mr Modi is no more seen as a villian figure even by his opponent that title has now gorn to Shah. This is how politics works DM. Now, the important question is how should we judge a person in politics, I have no problem in what Raghav said that he would prefer Lalu or Mulayam over Shah anyday that is fine but the reason he gave is that Shah is criminal and Laloo is not is wrong. I personally know the family of Deoria which till date is shattered. Rather than going through popular perception, lets judge the person as to how he has performed when that person was in responsible position. Shah tenure as Home Minister of Gujarat Vs Laloo/Mulayam tenure as CM of UP I think my prefference would be Shah.
seedhi Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 Calling Muslims "katue" is as wrong as calling Hindus "kaafir". Both of these terms are pejoratives. Only one of these has religious sanction. Who has given muslims or islam the right to call others names ?
Texan Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 The Delhi Assembly election last December saw the mysterious appearance of 15 independent candidates who fought on the symbol of a torch' date=' which with its rays closely resembled the broom, the symbol of the Aam Aadmi Party. On at least five seats, AAP prospects were damaged by these independents. In Janakpuri and Kalkaji, the winning margin of the BJP candidate was less than the number of votes polled by the mysterious torch candidates. Ask Amit Shah about the torch candidates and his eyes gain a mischievous gleam. "Some questions are best unanswered," he says.[/quote'] So, if he avoids a question, he is guilty? :hmmmm2: What kind of Lahori logic is this?! :cantstop:
diga Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 Now' date=' that you have successfully entered into a sh!t measuring contest - I'm glad to inform you that your sh!t is better than the other sh!t. I hope you feel wonderful about winning this contest.[/quote'] nobody can beat you at it...now tell us if BJP incited the riots in Sahranpur where the dispute was between Sikhs & Muslims?
Crookbond Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 So, if he avoids a question, he is guilty? :hmmmm2: What kind of Lahori logic is this?! :cantstop: Reading Comprehension failure? He didn't avoid the question. I don't think I need to explain this but while you answer something it is not just the content of the answer but the way you say it that matters too. Read the article once again and it is clear what he's alluding to. That unless, you want to score debate points over ICF - you win.
Crookbond Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 nobody can beat you at it...now tell us if BJP incited the riots in Sahranpur where the dispute was between Sikhs & Muslims? Of course, you can't beat me because I don't play the game. :winky: Please tell us how we should gladly accept Amit Shah because he is better than ISIS or Al Qaeda.
diga Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 Of course' date=' you can't beat me because I don't play the game. :winky: Please tell us how we should gladly accept Amit Shah because he is better than ISIS or Al Qaeda.[/quote'] better than the p-secs.. thats good enough
Crookbond Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 better than the p-secs.. thats good enough Better than this, better than that ... when on the wrong side of a discussion, find the worst possible benchmark and claim to be good enough.
diga Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 Better than this' date=' better than that ... when on the wrong side of a discussion, find the worst possible benchmark and claim to be good enough.[/quote'] instead of diverting the topic, why dont you answer my question ?
Texan Posted August 20, 2014 Posted August 20, 2014 Reading Comprehension failure? He didn't avoid the question. I don't think I need to explain this but while you answer something it is not just the content of the answer but the way you say it that matters too. Read the article once again and it is clear what he's alluding to. That unless' date=' you want to score debate points over ICF - you win.[/quote'] I guess it is reading comprehension failure on your part this time. When he says that some questions are best left unanswered, how is that considered an admission of guilt? Ohh right, his name is "Amit Shah". So no matter what he says, he is always guilty.
Crookbond Posted August 21, 2014 Posted August 21, 2014 I guess it is reading comprehension failure on your part this time. When he says that some questions are best left unanswered' date=' how is that considered an admission of guilt? Ohh right, his name is "Amit Shah". So no matter what he says, he is always guilty.[/quote'] The way he said it but don't expect you to accept that behind the garb of semantics.
Recommended Posts