sensible-indian Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Ok let me explain what I see in that Video......I see a Flex of clearly more than 15degrees and at the Time of delivery' date='[b']His Arm is not Straight enough and it is clearly over 15 degrees as visible to the naked eye. Now I don't get and will never get this extension BS which is just a rule of convenience to support a couple of chuckers....For me a Straight overarm action is legal,everything else is chucking. Simple question-If Someone had bowled that deliverY in Gully cricket in India Would that be NoBall or not? At the time of the release, the arm NEED NOT BE straight. That's the freaking point. The angle is NOT calculated from the straight arm position. The angle is calculated from the bend you initially have. I can start with a 23 degree bend and still bowl a legal ball if I don't extend my arms 15 degrees FROM that 23 degree bend. That's the rule. http://www.espncricinfo.com/pakistan-v-england-2012/content/story/552579.html
bowl_out Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Bend your elbow over 15 degrees is not clean action. Simple as that.... Whether he uses the bend to derive pace / spin / rotation is too difficult to say... Saqlain's arm is bent at around 30 deg from the time he starts the action till he delivers the ball... Clearly looks illegal.
kira Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 I wonder if Chuckqar and Chuckram could also be added to padosi chuck list....they are already on fixing and tampering list though :giggity:
sensible-indian Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Bend your elbow over 15 degrees is not clean action. Simple as that.... Whether he uses the bend to derive pace / spin / rotation is too difficult to say... Saqlain's arm is bent at around 30 deg from the time he starts the action till he delivers the ball... Clearly looks illegal. That's not how its calculated. See my above post. Try to chuck a ball without extending your arms. You can't. The power comes from the extension of the arms NOT the bend. More extension = More power which is why there is a limit on the extension. 15 degrees is the limit which is calculated taking the bent position as 0 degrees.
Gunner Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 i guess the other offspinner from Pak could also be a chucker... and yes the right decision is made by ICC for Ajmal.. one could observe thru naked eyes that He chucked ALL. i also beleive that Lankan fast bowler TALINGA is also a clear chucker... :hysterical:
kira Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Malinga is fine....Malinga has the cleanest action in world cricket
kira Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 I forgot another Padosi chucknaid khan is also in the chuck list alongside chuckmal,chucklain and chuckthar
sensible-indian Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 I forgot another Padosi chucknaid khan is also in the chuck list alongside chuckmal' date='chucklain and chuckthar[/quote'] You alright? You sound mad. What happened?
kira Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 You alright? You sound mad. What happened? I am just stating the facts here....don't you think Junaid khan chucks?
sensible-indian Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 I am just stating the facts here....don't you think Junaid khan chucks? Never noticed it closely to be honest (just like Narine's case). But thinking about it, yeah I do remember him him having some definite elbow flex that could be tricky.
CSK Fan Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 So Ajmal was chucking on an average at 30 degrees and some of his deliveries were at 40 degrees. Wow!
adi B Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 blatant chucker,deserved the ban.junaid next
sensible-indian Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 So Ajmal was chucking on an average at 30 degrees and some of his deliveries were at 40 degrees. Wow! On his reported deliveries (which were around 30 deliveries). In my view, they should also test every bowler's normal non reported deliveries (a few of them) so that we can get an idea of where they stand when they don't make special efforts.
SLICKR392 Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 So Ajmal was chucking on an average at 30 degrees and some of his deliveries were at 40 degrees. Wow! So he's the only one who's all 6 deliveries were found out to be illegal? Lol
vvvslaxman Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 So he's the only one who's all 6 deliveries were found out to be illegal? Lol The delusional padosi fans kept saying "icc cleared it icc cleared it" now when ICC bans them they are bad people :cantstop: It was freaking obvious he was chucking every ball .
CSK Fan Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 On his reported deliveries (which were around 30 deliveries). In my view, they should also test every bowler's normal non reported deliveries (a few of them) so that we can get an idea of where they stand when they don't make special efforts. 30 deliveries were reported out of around 30 overs he bowled in that match so it is once an over. And I am pretty sure his other non-reported ones will be over 15 degrees too
sensible-indian Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 30 deliveries were reported out of around 30 overs he bowled in that match so it is once an over. And I am pretty sure his other non-reported ones will be over 15 degrees too I know. All his 30 deliveries averaged around 30 degrees with a few crossing over 40 degrees. Odds are his normal ones would have exceeded the limits too. Just felt having the data about his unreported deliveries would let us know (for sure) whether his action would have been legal or not if he bowled to the best of his ability. Probably they tested that too and we don't know the results of that. When doing a comprehensive test, its better to go all the way. If we have the data list containing the normal delivery extensions of reported bowlers (Sena, Shillingford, Ajmal, etc), it might be useful down the line. Bowlers with similar actions will know whether they stand any chance even if they bowled to the best of their abilities. Anyways, was just a thought. I guess the domestic filtering that will be put in place now (by all countries) will take care of all that.
Malcolm Merlyn Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 eFR9n4QKjyM :hmmm::hmmm::hmmm::hmmm: Some of those are such blatant chucks.The one at 2.05 is as blatant as they come. The excuse of Padosis is that he is gem of a person and brought joy to Pakistan and etc etc etc and hence should be allowed to carry on. This guy is very cocky and thinks his comments are all joke etc.I for one is glad that such a blatant chucker is banned.Such a disrepute to the game this type of players are.Its almost cheating.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now