Jump to content

Srinivasan,Raj Kundra named in IPL scandal report


Recommended Posts

I see your point. But I wasn't a big fan of the rotation policy anyway, particularly for tests. Test cricket should be played only in 5-6 major stadium in the country - Wankhede, Chepauk, Chinnaswamy, Kotla, Eden Gardens and PCA stadium... That should be it, at least while playing against major teams (Aus, Eng, SA) .. Stadium could be chosen on rotation maybe... But no tests in Nagpur and Ahmedabad pls...
There are only a few venues for Test matches in India. The rotational policy was more for ODIs.
Link to comment
There are only a few venues for Test matches in India. The rotational policy was more for ODIs.
Nope it was for tests too. Infact due to rotation policy grounds like Nagpur and Ahmedabad got lots of test matches. Infact also to get back at Dalmiya BCCI stopped giving tests to Kolkatta and gave lots of tests to Nagpur.
Link to comment
Nope it was for tests too. Infact due to rotation policy grounds like Nagpur and Ahmedabad got lots of test matches. Infact also to get back at Dalmiya BCCI stopped giving tests to Kolkatta and gave lots of tests to Nagpur.
That's contradictory. If there is a rotational policy, why does Kolkata not get Test matches?!
Link to comment

End of road for N Srinivasan? In what could well be the end of N Srinivasan's tenure in the BCCI, the Supreme Court today observed that those who are under investigation should be kept away from elections in the BCCI, indicative of a conflict of interest involving Srinivasan,*Times Now*reported. Srinivasan is currently suspended president of BCCI and ICC chief. Headlines Today*reports, quoting the SC bench, that it was time the BCCI reconstitutes its body and prepare for fresh polls. The elections to BCCI, which were to be held in September have now been postponed indefinitely. 11.45 am: Disqualify CSK from IPL, no further probe needed, says SC The Supreme Court of India today observed that the Chennai Super Kings should be disqualified without any further probe by the Mudgal Committee, news channels quoted the bench as saying this morning. "Who is controlling Chennai Super Kings?" the bench asked, directing that India Cements chief N Srinivasan declare before it all shareholding patterns in the company as well as the sport franchise. "Why didn't the BCCI disqualify CSK? How can you say there is no comflict of interest?" the apex court asked. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court had said that N Srinivasan's son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan's role in IPL betting and spot-fixing scandal seemed like "insider trading" and agreed to hear a plea for making public the names of cricketers, who were mentioned in the Justice Mudgal Committee report.

Link to comment
DDNewsLive: SC asks N Srinivasan to furnish details of shareholding of India Cements and composition of its Board members utkarsh_aanand: #IPL: SC asks BCCI if it would now take actions against persons and teams after Mudgal panel report is out. @IndianExpress utkarsh_aanand: #IPL: SC tells BCCI it must take actions now that Mudgal report has come out with all facts & indictment. @IndianExpress utkarsh_aanand: #IPL case: SC says method of selecting IPL team is so vague that it can be assumed Meiyappan was involved in CSK decisions. @IndianExpress utkarsh_aanand: #IPL: SC says Meiyappan's wife was on India Cements Bd of Directors, Meiyappan may have inputs in all crucial CSK decision.@IndianExpress utkarsh_aanand: #IPL: SC asks BCCI if it was willing to have a new board without Srinivasan & new board could pass necessary orders.@IndianExpress utkarsh_aanand: #IPL corruption case: SC says Srinivasan's conflict of interst is "obvious" as he is BCCI chief & also CSK owner. @IndianExpress
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...