Crookbond Posted November 26, 2014 Share Posted November 26, 2014 I see your point. But I wasn't a big fan of the rotation policy anyway, particularly for tests. Test cricket should be played only in 5-6 major stadium in the country - Wankhede, Chepauk, Chinnaswamy, Kotla, Eden Gardens and PCA stadium... That should be it, at least while playing against major teams (Aus, Eng, SA) .. Stadium could be chosen on rotation maybe... But no tests in Nagpur and Ahmedabad pls... There are only a few venues for Test matches in India. The rotational policy was more for ODIs. Link to comment
HIC_NAA Posted November 26, 2014 Share Posted November 26, 2014 There are only a few venues for Test matches in India. The rotational policy was more for ODIs. Nope it was for tests too. Infact due to rotation policy grounds like Nagpur and Ahmedabad got lots of test matches. Infact also to get back at Dalmiya BCCI stopped giving tests to Kolkatta and gave lots of tests to Nagpur. Link to comment
Crookbond Posted November 26, 2014 Share Posted November 26, 2014 Nope it was for tests too. Infact due to rotation policy grounds like Nagpur and Ahmedabad got lots of test matches. Infact also to get back at Dalmiya BCCI stopped giving tests to Kolkatta and gave lots of tests to Nagpur. That's contradictory. If there is a rotational policy, why does Kolkata not get Test matches?! Link to comment
Precambrian Posted November 26, 2014 Share Posted November 26, 2014 That's contradictory. If there is a rotational policy' date=' why does Kolkata not get Test matches?![/quote'] Kolkota has hosted a test match ever year since 2010 except this year. Link to comment
BeautifulGame Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Supreme Court observes that Chennai Super Kings should be disqualified without any further enquiry Link to comment
diga Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Supreme Court observes that Chennai Super Kings should be disqualified without any further enquiry WhistlePodu Link to comment
BeautifulGame Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 WhistlePodu Only observation probably means nothing much Link to comment
JaFanatic Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Only observation probably means nothing much Link to comment
BeautifulGame Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Supreme Court wants fresh BCCI elections, says all involved in #IPLscam should stand aside Link to comment
diga Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Only observation probably means nothing much the country's SC feels that everything is not legal in CSK franchise..that's enough even if they actually dont cancel the franchise Link to comment
BeautifulGame Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 End of road for N Srinivasan? In what could well be the end of N Srinivasan's tenure in the BCCI, the Supreme Court today observed that those who are under investigation should be kept away from elections in the BCCI, indicative of a conflict of interest involving Srinivasan,*Times Now*reported. Srinivasan is currently suspended president of BCCI and ICC chief. Headlines Today*reports, quoting the SC bench, that it was time the BCCI reconstitutes its body and prepare for fresh polls. The elections to BCCI, which were to be held in September have now been postponed indefinitely. 11.45 am: Disqualify CSK from IPL, no further probe needed, says SC The Supreme Court of India today observed that the Chennai Super Kings should be disqualified without any further probe by the Mudgal Committee, news channels quoted the bench as saying this morning. "Who is controlling Chennai Super Kings?" the bench asked, directing that India Cements chief N Srinivasan declare before it all shareholding patterns in the company as well as the sport franchise. "Why didn't the BCCI disqualify CSK? How can you say there is no comflict of interest?" the apex court asked. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court had said that N Srinivasan's son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan's role in IPL betting and spot-fixing scandal seemed like "insider trading" and agreed to hear a plea for making public the names of cricketers, who were mentioned in the Justice Mudgal Committee report. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Only observation probably means nothing much They will pass orders based on their observations. Link to comment
BeautifulGame Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 They will pass orders based on their observations. Yeah true .But can't say for certain they will pass same as orders .I am only basing this on the jayalalitha case in 2003 similar conflict of interest case http://www.thehindu.com/2003/11/25/stories/2003112506160100.htm Link to comment
Crookbond Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 DDNewsLive: SC asks N Srinivasan to furnish details of shareholding of India Cements and composition of its Board members utkarsh_aanand: #IPL: SC asks BCCI if it would now take actions against persons and teams after Mudgal panel report is out. @IndianExpress utkarsh_aanand: #IPL: SC tells BCCI it must take actions now that Mudgal report has come out with all facts & indictment. @IndianExpress utkarsh_aanand: #IPL case: SC says method of selecting IPL team is so vague that it can be assumed Meiyappan was involved in CSK decisions. @IndianExpress utkarsh_aanand: #IPL: SC says Meiyappan's wife was on India Cements Bd of Directors, Meiyappan may have inputs in all crucial CSK decision.@IndianExpress utkarsh_aanand: #IPL: SC asks BCCI if it was willing to have a new board without Srinivasan & new board could pass necessary orders.@IndianExpress utkarsh_aanand: #IPL corruption case: SC says Srinivasan's conflict of interst is "obvious" as he is BCCI chief & also CSK owner. @IndianExpress Link to comment
zubinpepsi Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Good riddance to srini mama.. too much of high-handedness .... i hope they sell csk to some one else and keep the team intact... Link to comment
BeautifulGame Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Good riddance to srini mama.. too much of high-handedness .... i hope they sell csk to some one else and keep the team intact... Very true :agree: Too much controversy with Srini Link to comment
diga Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 The court also said that the "dual role" of MS Dhoni as the captain of CSK and vice president of India Cements is a matter of "concern." Link to comment
BeautifulGame Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Plenty of cricketers including Rahul Dravid are India cements employees .So that's kinda tricky Link to comment
Lord Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Plenty of cricketers including Rahul Dravid are India cements employees .So that's kinda tricky but they don't captain the team which India cements owner owns Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now