Precambrian Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 .......... exactly how is that a "concern"? Judges either quoted out of context or there is an overreach by the court.
Precambrian Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 but they don't captain the team which India cements owner owns What is the problem if he captains? i'd be more worried about him captaining team India here rather than CSK.
diga Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 exactly how is that a "concern"? Judges either quoted out of context or there is an overreach by the court. you ask the judge.. MSD's name coming up in this has far reaching consequences
BeautifulGame Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 but they don't captain the team which India cements owner owns And how exactly that is wrong ? Dravid was also an IC employee when he captained RCB and played against a team owned by CSK .So he was even more under COF by that basis .Should he be pulled up as well ? Almost every player is employed with a domestic club .So this is stretching it a bit
rkt.india Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 What is the problem if he captains? i'd be more worried about him captaining team India here rather than CSK. Objection is he captains Indian team and also works for Indian Cements who have an IPL team which he captains too, so, thee is conflict of interest there too.
Lord Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 And how exactly that is wrong ? Dravid was also an IC employee when he captained RCB and played against a team owned by CSK .So he was even more under COF by that basis .Should he be pulled up as well ? Almost every player is employed with a domestic club .So this is stretching it a bit how exactly was Dravid in conflict of interest by captaining RCB?Srini has no connection with RCB AFAIK :hmmm:
Lord Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 What is the problem if he captains? i'd be more worried about him captaining team India here rather than CSK. The case is related to IPL,no?
rkt.india Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 And how exactly that is wrong ? Dravid was also an IC employee when he captained RCB and played against a team owned by CSK .So he was even more under COF by that basis .Should he be pulled up as well ? Almost every player is employed with a domestic club .So this is stretching it a bit Question is Dhoni captaining India while he is CSK captain and also an India Cements VC that is bigger conflict.
G_B_ Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 they should either sell csk to somebody or they should dissolve CSK and a new franchise from chennai must come up in its place.
Precambrian Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 Objection is he captains Indian team and also works for Indian Cements who have an IPL team which he captains too' date=' so, thee is conflict of interest there too.[/quote'] Conflict of interest regarding what? I find absolutely nothing wrong Dhoni captaining CSK and being an employee of india cements. CSK is owned by India cements so I don't understand how Dhoni being an employee of IC can be prejudicial to its interests. That line of thought is ridiculous. Even I don't understand how Dhoni being Indian team captain is an instance of conflict of interest. Bizzare. Maybe I am missing something.
Crookbond Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 Question is Dhoni captaining India while he is CSK captain and also an India Cements VC that is bigger conflict. Dravid was captain of India and has been an employee of India Cements since 1994.
Precambrian Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 Question is Dhoni captaining India while he is CSK captain and also an India Cements VC that is bigger conflict. How's that a conflict? Conflict of interest is defined as : A term used to describe the situation in which a public official or fiduciary who, contrary to the obligation and absolute duty to act for the benefit of the public or a designated individual, exploits the relationship for personal benefit, typically pecuniary. I do not understand how Dhoni can be regarded as "not in a position to discharge his obligation to his national team/CSK team" just because he is employed by India Cements.
rkt.india Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 Conflict of interest regarding what? I find absolutely nothing wrong Dhoni captaining CSK and being an employee of india cements. CSK is owned by India cements so I don't understand how Dhoni being an employee of IC can be prejudicial to its interests. That line of thought is ridiculous. Even I don't understand how Dhoni being Indian team captain is an instance of conflict of interest. Bizzare. Maybe I am missing something. This is not the question. There is nothing wrong in Dhoni captaining CSK and VC of India cements but also being captain of India simultaneously is what is concerning that SC said.
Precambrian Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 This is not the question. There is nothing wrong in Dhoni captaining CSK and VC of India cements but also being captain of India simultaneously is what is concerning that SC said. Again how? Sorry for sounding like a broken record but i fail to understand how Indian captaincy is "compromised" by this arrangement.
Crookbond Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 Conflict of interest regarding what? I find absolutely nothing wrong Dhoni captaining CSK and being an employee of india cements. CSK is owned by India cements so I don't understand how Dhoni being an employee of IC can be prejudicial to its interests. That line of thought is ridiculous. Even I don't understand how Dhoni being Indian team captain is an instance of conflict of interest. Bizzare. Maybe I am missing something. The conflict of interest wrt India Cements lies with Srinivasan primarily. Dhoni's conflict of interest is with his own firm Rhiti Sports and as India team captain.
rkt.india Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 Dravid was captain of India and has been an employee of India Cements since 1994. India Cements did not have a team CSK then. Did they? Otherwise, a lot of players have worked for corporate companies and played for their teams like Air India, ONGC, BPL, etc. and play for India that is not an issue. Issue is CSK is a franchise of IPL and Dhoni being captain of India and also captain of CSK along with VC of India cements, he holds such positions where he can influence things like team selection. It does not mean, he did, but that situation certainly arises questions marks.
BeautifulGame Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 Can we be at least in context here.SC didn't bring Dhoni name up.It was brought up by opposition lawyers and a SC just made a remark or opinion .Not brought up by SC
rkt.india Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 Again how? Sorry for sounding like a broken record but i fail to understand how Indian captaincy is "compromised" by this arrangement. Because he holds such positions where he can influence things like team selection for Indian team by promoting or recommending CSK players.
rkt.india Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 Can we be at least in context here.SC didn't bring Dhoni name up.It was brought up by opposition lawyers and a SC just made a remark or opinion .Not brought up by SC and that remark raises the debate itself.
BeautifulGame Posted November 27, 2014 Posted November 27, 2014 Because he holds such positions where he can influence things like team selection for Indian team by promoting or recommending CSK players. So Kohli isn't also under conflict of interest? He captains RCB and can influence RCB player selection for Indian team . Should anyone captains an IPL or Ranji team then not be appointed as Indian captain ?I am seriously confused.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now