Jump to content

Speed of Indian fast bowlers in world cup comparing others


Recommended Posts

Posted
Performance after grp stage 23qxoop.jpg
These stats clearly show that Jadeja has been the weakest bowler. He can be a liability in NZ where the boundaries are small. Add to that his weak batting. Binny would have been better in NZ.
Posted
These stats clearly show that Jadeja has been the weakest bowler. He can be a liability in NZ where the boundaries are small. Add to that his weak batting. Binny would have been better in NZ.
doesnt matter now,3 matches in Aus(if we make it)
Posted
Binny would have been better in NZ.
binny averages a clear 13 less than jadeja in ranji despite being the senior player and barely more than ashwin. he does not have the standard to contribute in internationals.he was looking like a club player when he played in the warm match vs Australian seamers.
Posted
binny averages a clear 13 less than jadeja in ranji despite being the senior player and barely more than ashwin. he does not have the standard to contribute in internationals.he was looking like a club player when he played in the warm match vs Australian seamers.
Ranji is a 4 / 5 day tournament played in India. Does not reflect a player's ODI ability outside the subcontinent. Binny is not the ideal choice but our choice is limited to the selected players. Jadeja has looked a very poor ODI batsman. Someone batting at 7 cannot be this poor.
Posted
Ranji is a 4 / 5 day tournament played in India. Does not reflect a player's ODI ability outside the subcontinent. .
it does...FC average is a function of how good his cricketing foundation is. for ODI or t20 too, cricketing basics matter. and I have seen him more than enough. binny= nowhere close to high standard with either bat or ball. he does not have it in him to be a successful international. what high standard do you expect from him? there are none.
Binny is not the ideal choice but our choice is limited to the selected players. Jadeja has looked a very poor ODI batsman. Someone batting at 7 cannot be this poor
a poor batsman does not average 32 after 100 matches and he would have been exposed long ago. however he has not fully evolved as a reliable matchwinner and is struggling right now.happens to everyone. yes he cannot bat under 7. he is a no7 at best. teams always have to carry a few out of form players.nothing can be done without alternatives binny is no alternative. he is mediocre and of little use.
Posted
it does...FC average is a function of how good his cricketing foundation is. for ODI or t20 too, cricketing basics matter. and I have seen him more than enough. binny= nowhere close to high standard with either bat or ball. he does not have it in him to be a successful international. what high standard do you expect from him? there are none. a poor batsman does not average 32 after 100 matches and he would have been exposed long ago. however he has not fully evolved as a reliable matchwinner and is struggling right now.happens to everyone. yes he cannot bat under 7. he is a no7 at best. teams always have to carry a few out of form players.nothing can be done without alternatives binny is no alternative. he is mediocre and of little use.
Jadeja averages just 21 after 12 tests. Highest of just 68. Binny averages 22 albeit in just 3 tests. His innings of 78 in a test in England was quite good. He played the quicks well and with a straight bat. I have never seen Jadeja bat like this in a test match. Binny is a late bloomer. Jadeja's ODI average of 32 from 79 innings is due to 26 not outs due to coming in very late almost always. He looks a very unconvincing batsman at international level .
Posted

^ Also, Ranji trophy record is not a very good reflection of a player's cricketing foundation. There have been hundreds of hacks over the years who have had good Ranji averages. Ranji trophy is a poor domestic competition with severe flaws, too many teams of low quality and with very few sporting pitches. Our domestic competitions require major overhauls if domestic stats are to carry more meaning.

Posted

Shami is the second best bowler in the tourney so far just 1 wicket behind Starc and they both have played only 5 matches each (not 6 like most other top bowlers). :hatsoff: to Shami for his performance so far. Let us hope that he continues this way in the knock-outs.

Posted

shami has been a beast, wish we had a backup bowler like aaron who can be an x factor. mohit was really good too wish we bowled yorkers more. fast yorkers and slower ones could add something to the attack

Posted
Shami is the second best bowler in the tourney so far just 1 wicket behind Starc and they both have played only 5 matches each (not 6 like most other top bowlers). :hatsoff: to Shami for his performance so far. Let us hope that he continues this way in the knock-outs.
Stats are misleading. Starch and boult both have been better than sham I.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...