Jump to content

Indian bowling at top at conceding three hundreds or more in an innings


Recommended Posts

Posted

Well our bowling was mediocre to average in the past except in patches, so no surprises there. Currently our attack is superior to the self-declared powerhouse of Pakistan (including chuckers).

Posted
We are also giving Australia and South Africa a run for their money on the criteria of most innings where we scored 3+ hundreds.
Really!!! 10 vs 15 or 16 is giving a run for money!!!:giggle: (Even SL has 9 and Pak n Eng has 8 and WI has 7) Should we say all of them are giving a run for money for Aus/SA.:cantstop:
Posted

I assume this is for test matches? The table doesn't really make sense without context. Just doing a little research, India has played 151 test matches since 2000. Pakistan has played 125. There are many teams who I bet have played even less. More matches= more centuries conceded. I haven't looked up the statistics for ODIs so the gap could be even bigger. You also have to account for the fact that India plays tough tours more often than many. This is because they generate the BCCI more money. India/ Aus have toured each other 4 times since 2010. On the other end, Bangladesh has hardly played the big nations, half of their series have been against Zimbabwe

Posted
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Padosi desperation.
Come on, bro. Relax. Thats the one thing that brings me back to icf everytime. That one thing is the freedom to laugh at your ownself and others. So enjoy. :sherlock:
Posted
Well our bowling was mediocre to average in the past except in patches, so no surprises there. Currently our attack is superior to the self-declared powerhouse of Pakistan (including chuckers).
Expecting Pakistan to give India run for money now that chuckers are out of pictures. :((
Posted
Really!!! 10 vs 15 or 16 is giving a run for money!!!:giggle: (Even SL has 9 and Pak n Eng has 8 and WI has 7) Should we say all of them are giving a run for money for Aus/SA.:cantstop:
This was one smashing breakdown. :cantstop:
yeah I can read that but how many matches
No idea, bro.
Posted

It is no secret that India broke some records in bowling between 2011-2012. Padosis are lucky not to have as many tough tours as India. Anyway three hundreds in an innings is not indicative of the worst bowling. Three bowlers giving 100 runs each is 300 runs. Five bowlers conceding 80 each makes 400 runs. Bowling averages are better performance indicators.

Posted
It is no secret that India broke some records in bowling between 2011-2012. Padosis are lucky not to have as many tough tours as India. Anyway three hundreds in an innings is not indicative of the worst bowling. Three bowlers giving 100 runs each is 300 runs. Five bowlers conceding 80 each makes 400 runs. Bowling averages are better performance indicators.
I think it refers to opposition batsmen making hundreds not the bowers going for 100+ in an innings.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...