vayuu1 Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 Folks, here is the trailer of akshay, sid starrer brothers, it's am official remake of warriors and loinsgate films first indian venture. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QuRSCU0tOKs
flamy Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 The original is much, much better. Official remake huh? So, now finally bollywood is legit :hysterical: I have watched Warrior at least 4 times. Damn juicy movie. :yay:
Temujin Khaghan Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 The original is much, much better. Official remake huh? So, now finally bollywood is legit :hysterical: I have watched Warrior at least 4 times. Damn juicy movie. :yay: both the lead actors are known not to use steroids for bodybuilding.
flamy Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 both the lead actors are known not to use steroids for bodybuilding. :WTF: I'm not talkin bikes brah. It was real enjoyable watching (4 times and counting)
vayuu1 Posted June 11, 2015 Author Posted June 11, 2015 The original is much, much better. Official remake huh? So, now finally bollywood is legit :hysterical: I have watched Warrior at least 4 times. Damn juicy movie. :yay: Flamy, have you seen this movie yet to release, though warrior was good, let see how this one fares.
vayuu1 Posted June 11, 2015 Author Posted June 11, 2015 Also this movie is being co-produced by loinsgate films, the original producers of the movie, it's there first movie venture in india.
vayuu1 Posted June 11, 2015 Author Posted June 11, 2015 It's good to see so many hollywood big names involved in bollywood, fox studios, Warner, paramount, 20th century and now loinsgate, was reading somewhere Cameron (Avatar and titanic fame)said after Avatar series he is planning to make movies on either ramayana or mahabharat, but acc. To him it will require a much advanced technology and a budget atleast 4-5 times more than Avatar for a single film also it will require 4d technology rathar than imax3d or real 3d so basically we are looking at a budget of 1.25 to 1.5 billion $ per film that is just insane.
flamy Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 Flamy' date=' have you seen this movie yet to release, though warrior was good, let see how this one fares.[/quote'] I saw the trailer and can already tell it will suck. The fellow who is playing Tom Hardy has zero presence.
vayuu1 Posted June 11, 2015 Author Posted June 11, 2015 He also said for ramayana it requires 5 parts and mahabharat atleast 8 parts.
flamy Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 He also said for ramayana it requires 5 partss and mahabharat atleast 8 parts. They are epics. 5 or 8 parts might still not capture everything but can do enough justice.
vayuu1 Posted June 11, 2015 Author Posted June 11, 2015 They are epics. 5 or 8 parts might still not capture everything but can do enough justice. Exactly, but with that budget we are looking at a film series in atleast 10-12 billion for ramayana and 15-20 billion for mahabharat that is huge even for hollywood standards.
Detonator Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 And the aping continues. Pro-wrestling and MMA has massive presence in western pop-culture, which is why movies like Warrior, Foxcatcher worked. India has nothing to do with MMA fights, yet bollywood makes these kind of movies. Bollywood is looking very un-indian in recent movies with western stock characters like popular high school diva, jock and coach, mary sue, westernized rich people problems etc.,
Detonator Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 Exactly' date=' but with that budget we are looking at a film series in atleast 10-12 billion for ramayana and 15-20 billion for mahabharat that is huge even for hollywood standards.[/quote'] Check out Grant Morrison's 18 days
flamy Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 And the aping continues. Pro-wrestling and MMA has massive presence in western pop-culture, which is why movies like Warrior, Foxcatcher worked. India has nothing to do with MMA fights, yet bollywood makes these kind of movies. Bollywood is looking very un-indian in recent movies with western stock characters like popular high school diva, jock and coach, mary sue, westernized rich people problems etc., Exactly. But then, I have never given two farts about Bollywood.
Sooda Posted June 11, 2015 Posted June 11, 2015 And the aping continues. Pro-wrestling and MMA has massive presence in western pop-culture, which is why movies like Warrior, Foxcatcher worked. India has nothing to do with MMA fights, yet bollywood makes these kind of movies. Bollywood is looking very un-indian in recent movies with western stock characters like popular high school diva, jock and coach, mary sue, westernized rich people problems etc., Actually Warrior works because the human/family element is genuine and well acted and has some badass fights to top it off- otherwise the plot is entirely predictable. Even if you are not a fan of MMA at all - and I am not- you could enjoy it. I can see the bollywood film Brothers focussing on the action too much to the detriment of the story of the brothers, that balance is what Warrior did well. Plus Akshay, as good a action hero as he is, is a bit old for this part no? 17 years older than Sid M in real life edit:The trailer does look good actually!!
Number Posted August 7, 2015 Posted August 7, 2015 BYe5R5iAIa0 She is getting sexier. In 2000s I only found her hot in only in the Don song. Last few years her songs have been raunchy.
Donal Cozzie Posted August 7, 2015 Posted August 7, 2015 My reimagining of the famous scene "Cracks 3 bottles together* PCB: "Indiiiiaaaaaaaa, come out to plaaaayyyyyyyyy" "Indiaaaaaaaaaaaa. come out to playyayyyyyyyyyyy" IIIINNNDDDDDDIIIIIAAAAAAA......COME OUT TO PLAYAYYAAYAYAYYYYYY *Srini appears* NO! *roll credits*
Recommended Posts