maniac Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 From what I have seen....Kohli and Rohit are the only 2 batsmen from the younger generation who have shown technique,temperament and skills to play quality pace bowling. Despite his innings in South Africa,still bot sold on Pujara's ability to play quality pace...Will hold my judgement on Rahane. Infact,might sound weird when I say this but Pappu Patel seems to be a good batsman against pace bowling,but has too many brainfarts and his keeping
Old guy Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 Hope he has worked on his frontfoot game, which was really poor in ODIs he played in SL. should never judge shots from picture but even this one looks like classic rohit shot :P
Old guy Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 From what I have seen....Kohli and Rohit are the only 2 batsmen from the younger generation who have shown technique,temperament and skills to play quality pace bowling. Despite his innings in South Africa,still bot sold on Pujara's ability to play quality pace...Will hold my judgement on Rahane. Infact,might sound weird when I say this but Pappu Patel seems to be a good batsman against pace bowling,but has too many brainfarts and his keeping rohit can play phast bowling but pujara cant? have u seen any of rohit innings in south africa? in odis he made a fool of himself!
cowboysfan Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 I still think Rohit is a natural replacement for sachin,we just have to give in time in Test cricket ad not play him in any other format .
Old guy Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 I still think Rohit is a natural replacement for sachin' date='we just have to give in time in Test cricket ad not play him in any other format .[/quote'] imo rahane should play at number 4 he is more suited for top order place rohit should come in at number 6
IKnowU Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 Rohit and Rahane are still the only real replacements when Sachin, Gambhir, Sehwag or Jadeja get kicked out. I cannot see anything in any other batsmen.
Old guy Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 Rohit and Rahane are still the only real replacements when Sachin, Gambhir, Sehwag or Jadeja get kicked out. I cannot see anything in any other batsmen. rayadu is good batsman did well on a tours yesterday his side collapsed badly and he again got fighting 50 they were 117-7 and he made 50 odd out of them..imo good bat out performed all manduck ,mukund and co then there is tiwary he scored well even against england should have been our no 6 is inured now..i dont think he will survive on bouncy tracks but very reliable on indian spin tracks imo atleast have batsmen who are useful at home :D imo all of these guys are good enough to come in our current batting side on form alone :giggle: and as u mentioned we have rahane waiting in squad and not getting into 11.. there is enough batting talent need to get them into side and hope for best give backing like we gave to kohli im sure there will be more good batsmen coming through but whts the point we will play raina and yuvraj again and public will think we dont have nay talent coming through and statements like dravid gave dont help the cause either..
Rohit S. Ambani Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 He should bat at no. 3 in ODIs, too much pressure at @ no. 6. Unfair for new guy.
CG Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 Rohit place is secure combined with talent he has a great Mind.He signed with Rhiti Mindscape:winky:
Magneto Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 He should bat at no. 3 in ODIs' date=' too much pressure at @ no. 6. Unfair for new guy.[/quote'] No. 12 would be better. Least amount of pressure. :good:
Rohit S. Ambani Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 No. 12 would be better. Least amount of pressure. :good: He will prove his critics wrong, give him extended run.
India-KXIP fan Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 He will prove his critics wrong' date=' give him extended run.[/quote'] Yeah he looks good when he's playing well. Should be playing tests though.
velu Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 Rohit should not play micky mouse ODIs. He should be given opportunity to establish himself in tests , the real format. :--D
gaurav92 Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 He will score runs eventually ! Keep feeding him chances, I am sure he will score a ton here and there every 20 odd innings yeah maybe !
India-KXIP fan Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 He will score runs eventually ! Keep feeding him chances' date=' I am sure he will score a ton here and there every 20 odd innings yeah maybe ![/quote'] Exactly! He is talented and should be playing tests. Might as well keep giving him chances in ODI's. Although not every 20 innings for a 100 like you said... That's slightly high. It would be about 15. So that's 20 hundreds in 300 innings. Good ODI record that. :two_thumbs_up:
Ram Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 How this incredibly over-rated, equally under-achieving player keeps making the playing XI ahead of more deserving candidates like Manoj Tiwary, Saurabh Tiwary, Ambati Rayudu is beyond reason. At what point do fans stop calling Rohit Sharma as a really talented player who is at the cusp of greatness and start calling him as a perennial under-achiever who, despite an abundance of talent, simply does not have the mental fortitude to succeed, at least at this stage of his career. Consider this - Virat Kohli made his ODI debut a full 15 months after Rohit Sharma did. Since that time, he has gone on to establish himself as THE best batsmen in ODI cricket, while Rohit Sharma still casually struts with the tag of a relative newcomer.
Number Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 His ODI career is finished and I think he won't be selected in Tests too .
bharat297 Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 What annoys me about people's attitude is the inconsistency. Here is a guy with obvious talent and technique and despite the fact that he's averaging 61 in FC cricket, we're sitting here debating his worth in Test cricket due to his poor ODI performances ... Meanwhile our Test side in the last 18 months has lost 8-0 away from home and 2-1 at home to major Test nations and gone from 1st to 5th ... Seriously ... To the people that hate him ... Honestly, what is wrong with giving this guy a chance in Test cricket, the format that he has earnt a place in based on domestic cricket?
Sid Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 Oh no the being played in wrong format crap again If he is such a technical genius why couldnt he survive today?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now