HouMac Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 Good = RP Singh and Hogg. BAD - Umpiring. About 150 undeserved runs on the day. About as bad as I've ever seen.
fineleg Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 fineleg, i think u have created this thread a bit too early.. aus offcourse are in a situation in which they have recovered well.. but i am not sure u know that they are as of now just 370-7.. not a very great score.. offcourse good score on day 1, but with 7 down, they might be bowled out in another 40 runs may be.. 415- is nothing really to be frank.. 415 is nothing? Tics are u serious? (ofcourse they can get more than 415, but assuming they get out for 415, thats a serious total Tics!)
Cricketics Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 thats a good first inning total, not a great total.. considering we have some fine batting line up here.. regardless of how they performed in first test..
Guest Hiten. Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 thats a good first inning total' date=' not a great total.. considering we have some fine batting line up here.. regardless of how they performed in first test..[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Ye teri hope tujhe le dubey gi meri bhai :hysterical:
donkey Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 No. Indian bowling sucks. Period There is no "revival" in our bowling. We are still sore losers when it comes to bowling the opposition out. its our battin that sux at the moment...bowlers are doing a decent job despite all the fuked up umpiring
fineleg Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 thats a good first inning total' date=' not a great total.. considering we have some fine batting line up here.. regardless of how they performed in first test..[/quote'] Say, India play 3 Test matches (6 innings) and get less than 200 in each and every one of the 6 innings...I think you will still say we are most likely gonna score 500+ in the 7th Inn (our 1st Inn at Adelaide) :D Just take it as a hypothetical example above, Will you or will you not feel that? :D If yes, that explains what you wrote above.
Cricketics Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 there is a time when there is such feeling that team will perform. cricketics wayz, its all about it..
Guest Hiten. Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 there is a time when there is such feeling that team will perform. cricketics wayz, its all about it.. Mujhe laga tha india will get a lead of 200 in 1st test.... 200 ki lead chodh...200 ek 1inn mein nahin bana paaaye :cantstop:
maggot_brain Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 BAD = selecting Harbhajan and Dravid still opening. Might as well concede defeat before single ball had been bowled, umpiring obviously, bowlers being too expensive GOOD= we reduced the world's best team to 131/6 in their own country.
Bumper Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 Good = Bucknor's got ears Bad = Bucknor's ears exist just to support his glasses Fugly = Bucknor can neither use his ears nor glasses
gator Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 Good = Bucknor's got ears Bad = Bucknor's ears exist just to support his glasses Fugly = Bucknor can neither use his ears nor glasses :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: classic
Ram Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 Good = Bucknor's got ears Bad = Bucknor's ears exist just to support his glasses Fugly = Bucknor can neither use his ears nor glasses :haha:
putrevus Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 How can they Allow to score 376 runs in a day After 134/6 This is really pathetic , how can you call yourself a good side , I understand lot of decisions went wrong but allowing them to score 376 when 6 of their main batsman were out is simply not acceptable. Indians simply didnt look like they were competing after tea , how can they allow 176 runs in a session , simply they were outplayed , all they had to do was restrict run flow wickets would have come but they couldnt do that , how will it play out i dont know but it doesnt look good.
Parth Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 This is really pathetic , how can you call yourself a good side , I understand lot of decisions went wrong but allowing them to score 376 when 6 of their main batsman were out is simply not acceptable. Indians simply didnt look like they were competing after tea , how can they allow 176 runs in a session , simply they were outplayed , all they had to do was restrict run flow wickets would have come but they couldnt do that , how will it play out i dont know but it doesnt look good. Thats the one consistent thing about India, they always do this.
jai_brooklyn Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 Bad decisions aside, they got taken to the cleaners. But it's tough when you have to get Symmonds out thrice to send him back.
SachDan Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 That f@cking Bucknor... it was a totally demoralised Indian side after that.
jai_brooklyn Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 Yeah, they looked like a beaten team. But you can't give 150 odd runs after tea. The aussies know when to turn the screws and pile it on. India, please come out and play positive tomorrow. This test is almost unwinnable now but playing not to lose is going to be disastrous.
Anakin Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 Good = Bucknor's got ears Bad = Bucknor's ears exist just to support his glasses Fugly = Bucknor can neither use his ears nor glasses:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: You shouldn't make fun of the disabled though
Dravid Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 when a guy like symo can get 2 lives...that can happen..
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now