Jump to content

Got to feel for Umesh Yadav


Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, jusarrived said:

Zaheer had a pretty mediocre start to his career , am talking about the phase where he was averaging ~22 for ~years IIRC . This is the period he won matches for us home and away . yeah agree , the likes of Sree and RP won us matches away from home , Ishant was better at home . From what I have seen till now , Yadav and Shami seem to do better in Indian conditions ...Shami relatively though is unproven away , I have some hopes on him and could be the bolwer for all conditions

Even if you exclude first 6 years of Zak's career. He started doing well from 2006 SA tour after his county stint and he still averaged 33 at home.

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, jusarrived said:

All Pak greats have better stats at home , like you said so did Srinath ..am not saying it favours Fast bowling , but Indian bowlers have an advantage having been brought up on such pitches . its like how SA or Eng batsmen do well on their swingin/seaming conditions . I would give a lot more credit for an Asian batsmen scoring in SA/Eng than Amla or Cook . similarly Anderson and Broad deserve the credit here , rather than Yadav and Shami for picking few wickets .

They have now started doing well here when both of them have played 100 tests. you are comparing them to bowlers who barely played 20 tests. Regarding Shami being unproven, you forgot Umesh hasn't played a single test in England, SA, NZ yet. Shami has played in England, SA and NZ. So, he isn't that that unproven and has a lot of scope for improvement.

Edited by rkt.india
Posted
2 hours ago, rkt.india said:

Shami has played in England, SA and NZ. so, he isn't that much unproven and has lot of scope for improvement.

Shami looks like a much better test bowler after his return from injury.

 

Now, he looks like taking wickets against top batsmen  more often than not....and succeeds on occasions too.

 

His figures would have been much better if not for so many dropped catches.

Posted
8 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Shami looks like a much better test bowler after his return from injury.

 

Now, he looks like taking wickets against top batsmen  more often than not....and succeeds on occasions too.

 

His figures would have been much better if not for so many dropped catches.

Yes and the reason for that is his much improved runup which has helped in increase pace and become more consistent. But he should look get fitter and stronger because overseas, he will have to bowl more overs, longer spells. Pacers will have to become strike bowler overseas unlike in India where spinners do that job.

Posted
1 hour ago, rkt.india said:

Yes and the reason for that is his much improved runup which has helped in increase pace and become more consistent. But he should look get fitter and stronger because overseas, he will have to bowl more overs, longer spells. Pacers will have to become strike bowler overseas unlike in India where spinners do that job.

Run-up and conversion of momentum into the delivery has been an  issue with many Indian seamers....good to see Shami improve this aspect.

 

Shami has increased his strength as well as stamina and is able to sustain his pace in the last session of a test match.

 

But, needs to improve his fitness and energy level.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...