India have to address batting inadequacies before facing Australia: Ian Chappell

[Switchblade]

Quote

https://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/india-have-to-address-batting-inadequacies-before-facing-australia-ian-chappell-5359147/

 

India need to sort out their inadequacies in batting before standing up to an “extremely strong” bowling attack later this year Down Under, feels former Australia captain Ian Chappell. Virat Kohli’s India will hope for redemption in Australia after Test series reverses in South Africa and England. “India now have to look on rehabilitating their reputation in the highly anticipated series against Australia but the batting inadequacies have to be addressed,” Chappell wrote in ‘ESPNcricinfo.com’.

“While Australia’s batting is questionable, with their two best players, Steven Smith and David Warner, missing through suspension, the bowling attack is still extremely strong.” India are slated to tour Australia for three T20 internationals, four Test matches and three ODIs from November 21 to January 18.

“If Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood, Patrick Cummins and Nathan Lyon remain fit then the Indian batsmen will be in for a challenging time. In England it was movement through the air and off the seam that created regular problems for them – apart from Virat Kohli – but it will be the extra bounce in Australia that sorts the men from the men.”

 

India were beaten 2-0 in the four-Test series on their last tour of Australia in 2014-15. Chappell further said, “A confident and in-form Rohit Sharma would be an ideal player to bolster the batting in Australia. His authoritative horizontal bat shots are perfectly designed to cope with the testing extra bounce, but sadly Rohit has never really come to grips with batting in Test cricket. Selecting him for the tour would be a gamble.”

The batting great termed India’s 4-1 loss to England a “missed opportunity” “India should view their disappointing 4-1 series loss to England as a missed opportunity. They were highly competitive in the series – apart from a disastrous loss at Lord’s – but the squad had enough ability to do better than just compete.

“The batting was disappointing and especially the way they played spin bowling in Southampton. A great opportunity went begging when their failure to be more proactive against Moeen Ali meant a chance to level the series was squandered. Apart from Cheteshwar Pujara, no player was prepared to alter the offspinner’s flight path by leaving his crease. The series loss is even more of a wasted opportunity when you consider how well the Indian fast bowlers performed.”

He said England should also watch out for the Australians ahead of next summer’s Ashes. “If either India or England underestimate Australia because of their recent travails, they could well be punished.”

 

[zen]

So much support for Rohit in Eng and Aus

 

do do they want his wkt cheaply?

[mishra]

^ Told same on another thread. Rohit will be back in australi at the cost of Vihari or Pant or both.

[zen]

Just now, mishra said:

^ Told same on another thread. Rohit will be back in australi at the cost of Vihari or Pant or both.

Pant is WK in tests since Saha is likely to be unavailable .... Ind may not play extra batsman so it would be among Vihari, Rahane and Rohit for the #5 slot

[Switchblade]

11 minutes ago, zen said:

So much support for Rohit in Eng and Aus

 

do do they want his wkt cheaply?

Manjrekar and Gavaskar will be teary eyed then.

[mishra]

7 minutes ago, zen said:

Pant is WK in tests since Saha is likely to be unavailable .... Ind may not play extra batsman so it would be among Vihari, Rahane and Rohit for the #5 slot

No, if you are to believe selectors , pundits and media, Rohit is answer. While Vihari is irrelevant and doesnt need or getting any air/column time.

As per them, Pant can not play as keeper till he improves his keeping. What it means is Talent is ahead of both in the selection queue. The dont want To consider Pant as bat> Talent

Edited September 17, 2018 by mishra

[zen]

1 minute ago, mishra said:

No, if you are to believe selectors , pundits and media, Rohit is answer. While Vihari is irrelevant and doesnt need or getting any air/column time.

As per them, Pant can not play as keeper till he improves his keeping. What it means is Talent is ahead if both selection queue

 So do they want Rohit to keep?  

[mishra]

2 minutes ago, zen said:

 So do they want Rohit to keep?  

We are number 1 test side. We should have proper keepers and proper bats 

[Vilander]

blah blah...

 

Aus will get a r'd this time..lol

[Switchblade]

14 minutes ago, Vilander said:

blah blah...

 

Aus will get a r'd this time..lol

You said same about England but it was complete opposite .

[Vilander]

5 minutes ago, Switchblade said:

You said same about England but it was complete opposite .

all because of Curran and toss wont happen again.

[Switchblade]

5 minutes ago, Vilander said:

all because of Curran and toss wont happen again.

Too much optimistic these are weak bunch of players.

[Ankit_sharma03]

14 hours ago, Switchblade said:

“A confident and in-form Rohit Sharma would be an ideal player to bolster the batting in Australia.

didnt he go to Aus last time after scoring that 264 , thats confidence n form and he fa