Jump to content

Vernon Philander - all wrongs make a right


Recommended Posts

Stocky.  Yes, muscular, but stocky with even a little semblance of a belly. 

 

561fde8a3bd8409fa2d5a6e64c9bf6f5.jpg

 

Slow, lumbering run-up.  No flair, almost seems like he is struggling to get his body turned while delivering the ball.  In the end, decent action, middling speed.  But, look at his numbers and they just boggle your mind.  

 

   Mat Inns Balls Runs Wkts BBI BBM Ave Econ SR 4w 5w 10
Tests Insights on test 48 89 8733 3946 182 6/42 10/102 21.68 2.71 47.9 7 12 2

 

Obviously he has never completely destroyed / run through a line up taking 7 or 8 wickets and striking fear (today was his best ever showing), but keeps chipping away getting results.  I can't think of any good comparison of such a workhorse bowler with superstar statistics. 

Edited by Brainfade
Link to comment
3 minutes ago, goose said:

it's simple. if you don't ball bad balls the batsman has to hit your good balls

If it were that simple, more bowlers would do it.  That kind of consistency is obviously not common.  I've been watching cricket for 4 decades, but can't easily think of a bowler of this nature.  McGrath maybe?  But there was something fearsome about McGrath.  He was tall, lithe, flexible, great action, looked like a fast bowler, and ran through batting line ups.  This guy is just ... not sure what.

Link to comment
Just now, veer said:

Honestly speaking.. i didnt see 6fer type bowling from him. He was the weakest of all with the old ball with barely hitting 130k..  i hope one of our batters go after him in 2nd test. If batters play his bowls on merit then he will go for a plenty.

Exactly.  I am looking beyond today's 6-fer.  Look at his avg (<22) and SR (<48).  Barely hitting 130k, looking like the weakest link, but delivering consistently.

Link to comment
Just now, Brainfade said:

Exactly.  I am looking beyond today's 6-fer.  Look at his avg (<22) and SR (<48).  Barely hitting 130k, looking like the weakest link, but delivering consistently.

In these conditions. It's like Jaddu delivering on Indian pitches.

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, maniac said:

What about bowlers who are not able to do even that? 

 

It is lovely to have Starc and Cummins in the line up but if that option is not available Anderson and Philander will do.

I am not saying there is anything wrong about it. I am saying its not surprising seeing the kind pitches SA prepare at home. He has played all his cricket here and has learnt that art of just pitching the ball in that good length  area and he knows his limitations.

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

3 wickets per test.

 

1 minute ago, rkt.india said:

I am not saying there is anything wrong about it. I am saying its not surprising seeing the kind pitches SA prepare at home. He has played all his cricket here and has learnt that art of just pitching the ball in that good length  area and he knows his limitations.

I guess that is my point.  There is nothing to fear, it seems. 

Dale Steyn - ATG. 

Rabada - young, tearaway, beautiful action. 

Morkel - fast, bouncy. 

Philander?  Nothing remarkable.  Dibble-dobble but with 22 average.  Just give him the right conditions.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Brainfade said:

If it were that simple, more bowlers would do it.  That kind of consistency is obviously not common.  I've been watching cricket for 4 decades, but can't easily think of a bowler of this nature.  McGrath maybe?  But there was something fearsome about McGrath.  He was tall, lithe, flexible, great action, looked like a fast bowler, and ran through batting line ups.  This guy is just ... not sure what.

Maybe this guy. ...is just a good bowler 

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, Brainfade said:

Yep. Just doesn't "look the part."  And that is intriguing.  

Just maybe he bowls accordingly to what is in front of him and bowls to the weakness he is seeing at the time and not worrying if he  lands in the crease at 46.5mph or bowling a  speed of 145.677 because it's a Tuesday and Wednesday will mean 144.4555

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...