Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 hours ago, Straight Drive said:

I would like to see Boom, Bhuvi and Umesh in T20 pace attack. Hope Boom improves than what he has performed in IPL. OS does Bhuvi who has been off-color. But those a re the 3 i would like to see in T20i 11. 

 

Yadav should be playing for sure in all formats. There is no doubt in my mind about his accuracy and form. I agree about that totally. 

What so special abt bhuvi. Frankly he was quite mediocre during internationals odi nd ipl 18.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, raki05 said:

What so special abt bhuvi. Frankly he was quite mediocre during internationals odi nd ipl 18.

Bhuvi when he is not picking wickets chokes runs. Or if he is not choking runs, picks wickets. At times he manages to do both roles i.e. 1. Pick wickets and choke runs in same match. 

 

Last year he was top wicket taker in IPL and also his eco rate was very good compared to most of bowlers. 

 

This year he has under performed. No doubt.

Edited by Straight Drive
Posted
8 minutes ago, raki05 said:

And I m talking and this year ipl performanc.  And odi nd t20 international overall performance  is quite average. 

Would like to know who you think has given better performance than Bhuvi more often than not in this format.

Posted
8 minutes ago, raki05 said:

Did we try anyone deserving, besides unadkat and Siraj. Bumrah is only  all around fast bowler as per me

Only Bhvui and Jasprit where ones who could take the IPL form to T20i. The rest even struggled in IPL.

 

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, raki05 said:

Did we try anyone deserving, besides unadkat and Siraj. Bumrah is only  all around fast bowler as per me

 

Siraj should have been tried in ODIs but was tried in T20s.  

 

Unadkat should have been left in front of a TV during international games.

 

Kaul could have been tried in T20Is.

 

Prasidh and Khaleel have potential to be good ODI and T20I bowlers.

Posted (edited)

Bumrah  4th over ...  just 8 runs

 

139 k ... attempted yorker

Slower ... ball lobs up

140 k ...  yorker

139 k ...  yorker

145 k ... yorker ... how was that a wide !

147 k ... yorker

-        ...  wide

141 k ... low full toss ...catch dropped

 

Edited by express bowling
Posted
9 minutes ago, raki05 said:

Bhuvii has skill but his stats in odd no t20 is quite average. He needs to take wkt upfront.

I suggest check the stats for IPL as well as T20i. Bhuvi is winner in IPL, Bumrah edges it in T20i. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Straight Drive said:

Bhuvi when he is not picking wickets chokes runs. Or if he is not choking runs, picks wickets. At times he manages to do both roles i.e. 1. Pick wickets and choke runs in same match. 

 

Last year he was top wicket taker in IPL and also his eco rate was very good compared to most of bowlers. 

 

This year he has under performed. No doubt.

bhuvi is a v.good t-20 and test bowler...in odis bhuvi is mediocre...can't fathom how many of icfers mix formats......see his record of odis.

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, LORD_analyst said:

bhuvi is a v.good t-20 and test bowler...in odis bhuvi is mediocre...can't fathom how many of icfers mix formats......see his record of odis.

That's the problem with India. Like Windies we don't take T20 seriously and end up messing it since 2010. Whereas WI have won it twice because they play according to the needs and select their T20 teams accordingly, inspite of all the issues between board and their players. 

 

A lot of ODI players in T20i team.

Edited by Straight Drive
Posted
12 minutes ago, Straight Drive said:

I suggest check the stats for IPL as well as T20i. Bhuvi is winner in IPL, Bumrah edges it in T20i. 

M not  worried abt Ipl as he is international bowler and for all international players what they do in international is more important, Ipl is good to judge youngsters. Hence I m not even slightly worried abt how a kohli or sharma(rohit) is playing in ipl.

Posted
55 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Siraj should have been tried in ODIs but was tried in T20s.  

 

Unadkat should have been left in front of a TV during international games.

 

Kaul could have been tried in T20Is.

 

Prasidh and Khaleel have potential to be good ODI and T20I bowlers.

For me, Prasidh and Khaleel seem like bowlers who will do better in test cricket. Ofcourse, with a little bit of time but definitely more test material than limited overs.

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Rightarmfast said:

For me, Prasidh and Khaleel seem like bowlers who will do better in test cricket. Ofcourse, with a little bit of time but definitely more test material than limited overs.

prasidh is definitely a test material.....his pace is constant, bowls accurate line n length...khaleel pace varies a lot in spells....

Edited by LORD_analyst
Posted
1 hour ago, raki05 said:

And I m talking and this year ipl performanc.  And odi nd t20 international overall performance  is quite average. 

He's only had an average IPL and by no means an averages International whether it be test odi or T20.

×
×
  • Create New...