Are the British white the weakest male race?

[Muloghonto]

7 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

You do know that on ground Japanese mauled every territory but their blunder of attacking Pearl Harbor lost them the war?

They lost the war because they tried to mess with a far greater nation in terms of industrial capacity, technological prowess and manpower. Simple. 'Masculinity' had nothing to do with it, else they'd have won.

 

7 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

But the truth is far different in the case of Siberian forces who absolutely crushed German army in Russia which gave a brainfade to Hitler.

Nonsense. Hitler lost the war when he took over personally managing the battle of Stalingrad and cost germany its entire 2nd army group. Germany always had a severe manpower disadvantage over Russia but a severe technological advantage- the latter which Hitler neutralized by getting into a battle of attrition with the Russians. 

7 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

 

Masculine people are made up of toughness which these effeminate people can't do. I am pretty sure most of these sassies would run away even after seeing a muscular man. 

If that was the case, we'd be seeing Afghans and their 'masculinity' rule the world. Not get bombed into oblivion by nations where men can (and many do) dress as effeminate as they like. 

'Masculine people' are basically living by an old, dying code that has been proven through history to be thrown away when society progresses.

As i said and you keep igoring- all advanced societies in history, relative to their time, were 'effeminate' compared to the lesser advanced societies. Romans, Greeks, Chinese, Indians were all more advanced and all more effeminate than the Huns, Goths, Germans, Arabs, etc. 

 

[Muloghonto]

5 minutes ago, FischerTal said:

not sustainable. USA is proof of that. 

Sure it is sustainable. As long as the demographic crunch is overcome (which takes time) and the growth rate is at parity with death rate, society is sustainable.

 

[Franco Vazquez]

1 minute ago, Muloghonto said:

1. I am not a kid, i am a man in my 40s with kids. 

 

2. When you grow up, you will see that grown-ups in progressive societies don't care about your personal life, in a professional setting. Rapists and murderers are not about how one dresses/acts in their personal life, they are breaking the law in a criminal fashion. Last i checked, putting on lipstick/makeup or talking in a sing-song voice is not criminal conduct. 
As someone who has input into hiring for my firm, i am far more likely to torpedo an applicant like YOU, than your so-called 'effeminate' classmates. Because its YOU who is showing your inability to be professional and not judge people for how they look or talk in their personal lives.

 

 

 

You need to take off your tinted glasses and need to understand that a firm is a team work. Many people in this world are still not comfortable with gays as they are way too shady and sassy. You could keep a gay/effeminate in your company and do whatever with him but the problem will rise when all the other employees would leave the firm. The law of these gays is that accept us or you are a criminal when they themselves hate on Muslims and disagree with their activities like praying, fasting etc which are unharmful

[Muloghonto]

5 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

You need to take off your tinted glasses and need to understand that a firm is a team work.

I find it ironic that a student like yourself, is telling a man with 20 years work experience what firms are. You are correct, firms are about team-work. And team-work means professionalism and accepting your teammates personal choices as exactly that - none of your business and personal to them. So you are the one displaying lack of team-work. 

Quote

 

Many people in this world are still not comfortable with gays as they are way too shady and sassy.

it is YOUR job to be comfortable with your co-workers' personal life, as long as their conduct at work is professional. You are not comfortable with working with a gay person/religious person/trans, etc ? thats YOUR problem. Go find a new job. Thats how the modern world works. 

 

Quote

 

You could keep a gay/effeminate in your company and do whatever with him but the problem will rise when all the other employees would leave the firm.

Except most adults don't give a damn about whether you are gay or effeminate, as long as your conduct is professional. The few that do, get coached to overcome THEIR problem with another person's personal life and if still not rectified, fired. 

If YOU have a problem with another person's personal life, thats a YOU problem. Not 'they' problem.

Quote

 

The law of these gays is that accept us or you are a criminal when they themselves hate on Muslims and disagree with their activities like praying, fasting etc which are unharmful

Praying in midst of work, is something that affects the work. Same with fasting, in certain work fields. It directly affects their ability to work. Being gay or effeminate or wearing a skirt does not. 

Edited May 20, 2018 by Muloghonto

[FischerTal]

3 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Sure it is sustainable. As long as the demographic crunch is overcome (which takes time) and the growth rate is at parity with death rate, society is sustainable.

 

Our median income is going down except for the Asian communities, like Indians, Chinese, and Filipinos. Middle class-Whites average median income nowadays is around 50,000. Growth rate is primarily being driven by Latinos in USA right now which is why all the middle-class whites are shifting towards Trump. You have to take into account cultural changes.... i truly believe once the Latinos become 30-40 percent of USA's population, there will be race wars. 

[Franco Vazquez]

1 minute ago, Muloghonto said:

They lost the war because they tried to mess with a far greater nation in terms of industrial capacity, technological prowess and manpower. Simple. 'Masculinity' had nothing to do with it, else they'd have won.

 

Nonsense. Hitler lost the war when he took over personally managing the battle of Stalingrad and cost germany its entire 2nd army group. Germany always had a severe manpower disadvantage over Russia but a severe technological advantage- the latter which Hitler neutralized by getting into a battle of attrition with the Russians. 

If that was the case, we'd be seeing Afghans and their 'masculinity' rule the world. Not get bombed into oblivion by nations where men can (and many do) dress as effeminate as they like. 

'Masculine people' are basically living by an old, dying code that has been proven through history to be thrown away when society progresses.

As i said and you keep igoring- all advanced societies in history, relative to their time, were 'effeminate' compared to the lesser advanced societies. Romans, Greeks, Chinese, Indians were all more advanced and all more effeminate than the Huns, Goths, Germans, Arabs, etc. 

 

Why did he take the control himself on the Eastern Front? Because they winter came and Germans couldn't fight their arses off against Special Siberian forces which led them to be driven away. So do you think everyone should be effeminate and act like gays? What if people have their own personal principles but still they should all become gays until the world reaches its saturation point and gets wiped out slowly. Arabs are still masculine and see how US arses are sucking up to them for their oil money. A lot of problem with Afghanistan has to do with its internal problems and if they were effeminate, they wouldn't have been able to resist till now and would have become a part of Soviet Union. Masculinity is still important no matter what these PCs and SJWs tell you. If this is the way they are going most of the guys would stay at their home and women would work and their physical attributes and stamina is no way near the masculine man and would lead to the stalemate in the world.

[Franco Vazquez]

6 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

I find it ironic that a student like yourself, is telling a man with 20 years work experience what firms are. You are correct, firms are about team-work. And team-work means professionalism and accepting your teammates personal choices as exactly that - none of your business and personal to them. So you are the one displaying lack of team-work. 

it is YOUR job to be comfortable with your co-workers' personal life, as long as their conduct at work is professional. You are not comfortable with working with a gay person/religious person/trans, etc ? thats YOUR problem. Go find a new job. Thats how the modern world works. 

 

Except most adults don't give a damn about whether you are gay or effeminate, as long as your conduct is professional. The few that do, get coached to overcome THEIR problem with another person's personal life and if still not rectified, fired. 

If YOU have a problem with another person's personal life, thats a YOU problem. Not 'they' problem.

Praying in midst of work, is something that affects the work. Same with fasting, in certain work fields. It directly affects their ability to work. Being gay or effeminate or wearing a skirt does not. 

Most adults still give a damn about gays and all these sexualities made by these losers. You know the whole world is not a professional? There is also a role of military and labour which these privileged gays can't do as it is way too off for them. If they are directly doing such antics then it is their problem not mine. Most of the male victims are molested by gays you know that and it has increased a lot in recent times due to the increase in effeminate males who get crushed by every man. I find it really interesting that when a straight person does harassment its a crime (which is right) but when a gay does it its completely fine.

[Muloghonto]

3 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

Why did he take the control himself on the Eastern Front? Because they winter came and Germans couldn't fight their arses off against Special Siberian forces which led them to be driven away.

Again, nonsense. because he thought capturing a city called 'Stalingrad' will be a death-blow to the morale of the Soviets, instead of swinging south and capturing the Baku oil fields like his generals adviced. Germans were kicking the same special forces butt till that point in the war but lost once they lost their entire air superiority due to Hitler stupidly thinking that they can airlift supplies to the entire 2nd army.

 

3 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

So do you think everyone should be effeminate and act like gays?

I think people should talk and dress like whatever makes them happy and not make others feel uncomfortable about their own personal decisions, that have nothing to do with the individual passing judgement (ie, you).

 

3 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

What if people have their own personal principles but still they should all become gays until the world reaches its saturation point and gets wiped out slowly.

This makes no sense. Your personal principles are no less/no more valid than another person's. Keep them outside work-space and act professional. Or else be prepared to be fired/not hired in the real world. 

3 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

 

Arabs are still masculine and see how US arses are sucking up to them for their oil money.

LOL.

US has bases in Arab countries. US causes regime changes in Arab countries as they see fit ( example: Bahrain in the 70s, Qatar a few years ago). US is their mai-baap. 

 

3 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

A lot of problem with Afghanistan has to do with its internal problems and if they were effeminate, they wouldn't have been able to resist till now and would have become a part of Soviet Union.

Their 'masculinity' had nothing to do with the soviet failure in Afghanistan. Soviet failure was due to Afghanistan being a loss-making venture and the stinger missiles supplied by the US making their choppers sitting ducks. 

 

3 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

Masculinity is still important no matter what these PCs and SJWs tell you.

Nope, it isn't. Its a dying code, from a bygone era, made by weak, inferior men, to control women mostly because of inheritence issues (which modern medicine has solved). 

3 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

 

If this is the way they are going most of the guys would stay at their home and women would work and their physical attributes and stamina is no way near the masculine man and would lead to the stalemate in the world.

Good for the stay-at-home dads, if thats what they want and their partners are okay with it, all the power to them.

We live in the age of machines, where personal strength hardly matters in most fields of work. Soon we are going to have 3-d printed homes, which will make 'manly strength' even less useful at workplace. 

 

[Muloghonto]

2 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

Most adults still give a damn about gays and all these sexualities made by these losers.

Not in the workplace. Give a damn in your own personal time and personal life all you want. But at work, if you make your co-workers sexuality or dress-code a problem, then YOU are the problem and will be coached and then fired. As i said, be prepared for this simple fact. 

 

2 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

You know the whole world is not a professional? There is also a role of military and labour which these privileged gays can't do as it is way too off for them.

LOL. Modern military combat is all about logistics & technological prowess. This is why female pilots are bombing the crap out of macho-masculine men who are too stupid to see that they can't win. 

 

2 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

If they are directly doing such antics then it is their problem not mine. Most of the male victims are molested by gays you know that and it has increased a lot in recent times due to the increase in effeminate males who get crushed by every man.

The number of men molested by gays (or women) are far, far lesser than number of women molested by 'macho men'. That is a fact that can be easily substantiated. 

 

2 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

I find it really interesting that when a straight person does harassment its a crime (which is right) but when a gay does it its completely fine.

Thats more or less nonsense and not the case. 

[Muloghonto]

13 minutes ago, FischerTal said:

Our median income is going down except for the Asian communities, like Indians, Chinese, and Filipinos. Middle class-Whites average median income nowadays is around 50,000. Growth rate is primarily being driven by Latinos in USA right now which is why all the middle-class whites are shifting towards Trump. You have to take into account cultural changes.... i truly believe once the Latinos become 30-40 percent of USA's population, there will be race wars. 

That is because US is the dumbest of the western nations when it comes to education. In virtually all other western nations, the opposite is whats happening. 

[Franco Vazquez]

Name which female pilot bombed Afghanistan?

[Franco Vazquez]

It's a well-known fact that most of the gays and women are not mentally tough enough to be in the army. What's your problem if a man is masculine? Most of the people wouldn't have problem with masculine but many of them will have with a gay.

[Franco Vazquez]

If you are relying on the things which wont be in existence for at least next 100 years then its kinda useless. These gays have nothing to do except for doing useless parades here and there. The only problem here is you which you have with masculine people which are doing nothing. Maybe you feel inferior to them

[Muloghonto]

6 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

It's a well-known fact that most of the gays and women are not mentally tough enough to be in the army.

LOL. Thats why many western nations have gay men and women in the armed forces, right ? Clearly, you as a student know more than the generals in charge.

 

6 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

What's your problem if a man is masculine? Most of the people wouldn't have problem with masculine but many of them will have with a gay.

The world is changing. Most people i know and work with are straight people who have a problem with overly masculine men, because overly masculine men are way too aggressive, intolerant and poking their noses in other people's private lives - you are a case in point. 

Not to mention, as i said, its a dying code, from a bygone era. We live in a new world paradigm and have been for a while. One day, you will grow up and see how its crappy conduct and 'small man mentality' to judge people for decisions that have zero effect on you (ie, how they dress, how they talk, etc).

 

[Muloghonto]

3 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

If you are relying on the things which wont be in existence for at least next 100 years then its kinda useless. These gays have nothing to do except for doing useless parades here and there. The only problem here is you which you have with masculine people which are doing nothing. Maybe you feel inferior to them

Masculine men like yourself are the ones who are causing trouble judging people for their personal life choices. And as you said, you have a problem working with them. So YOU are the problem. Not the ones you have a problem with. 

its just that simple in the professional world. Nobody cares about your personal opinions. Work is about treating your colleagues with respect, communication and being non-judgemental. Doesn't matter if the judgement is towards them being masculine, feminine, gay, trans, straight or whatever. Commit to said judgement and you will either be fired (in most cases) or given a second chance to rectify your behaviour via coaching ( in some rare cases). 

 

[Muloghonto]

13 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

Name which female pilot bombed Afghanistan?

https://abcnews.go.com/WN/Afghanistan/female-combat-pilots-earn-respect-afghanistan/story?id=9159116

 

 

[Stradlater]

6 hours ago, MechEng said:

Wouldn't have been possible had our maharajas stood united against them and not fought amongst themselves for power.

Why would they?

Would you want India to stand with Pakistan in the face of an American invasion?

There was no concept of nation back then.

[panther]

7 hours ago, Franco Vazquez said:

Majorities of desis are not effeminate. Current white generation of UK is not really that good and thats why you could see dwindling interest in a gentlemen's game like cricket there. I am in a uni group and there are very few masculine white guys

Masculine white English don't go universities, you will find them on building sites, generally they are shorter than middle class Brits and have very poor facial features like recessed chins and crooked teeth along with high levels of balding.

[Stradlater]

3 minutes ago, panther said:

Masculine white English don't go universities, you will find them on building sites, generally they are shorter than middle class Brits and have very poor facial features like recessed chins and crooked teeth along with high levels of balding.

Masculinity is no standard for judging bravery else Pashtuns who are probably the most Gay group in South Asia wouldn't have been known for their valour on battlefield.

[punjabi_khota]

2 words: Freddy Flintoff