Isn't Hardik at 7 is a waste in T-20s ?

[Ankit_sharma03]

5 hours ago, Khota said:

You are getting agitated. When will it get thru you that after the fluky 90 he did zilch.

If ur going to turn my statment like a lukha journalist ohh yea it will piss me 

 

Fluky................let many batsman get that fluke 1st in Sa

 

after that he played IPL and pretty much got Mi back into reckoning 

In odi at his position he doesnt get a lot of chance to bat , but he has contributed with ball.....now ur not ready to accept that is being stubborn

[RAZPOR]

TBH I would get both Hardik and krunal ,batting at 6 and 7 together they would make a very good all round combination.

[Ankit_sharma03]

7 minutes ago, RAZPOR said:

TBH I would get both Hardik and krunal ,batting at 6 and 7 together they would make a very good all round combination.

yes thats the right way as it balances both our bowling n batting

[Nikhil_cric]

If you're gonna play 5 bowlers then there no place for Hardik in the side . Just play five specialist bats and Pant to beef up the batting 

[Clarke]

I wouldn't mind him at #5. His game against quicks does need to improve but he is among the most fearsome strikers in the country, smashes sixes with absolute ease.