3 full pacers are needed in t-20s but that upsets the balance

[PSB_Zone]

Yes bowlers win the game in t-20s as the extra batsmen at no 7 role is very limited

but If india decides to play Umesh,bhuvi and bumrah +hardik along with two wrist spinners
It puts bhuvi at no. 7 and then long tail..Bhuvi is gud but at no. 7 it does not gives confidence

Now there are two options either drop one of the wrist spinners and play Krunal pandya
or
Drop hardik and play a genuine batsmen which i am not sure is a good idea

[tweaker]

Today the team management should consider Chahar as the 3rd seamer in place of Hardik

[beetle]

Bhuvi is not a t 20 batsman. Can't expect him to play a role with the bat.

He can contribute in tests with the bat.

[kohli]

Rohit

Dhwan

Rahul

Kohli

Dhoni

Krunal

Hardik

Umesh

Bhuvi

Kuldeep

Bumrah (after fit)

In spining wicket bring chahal in place of umesh

[Cricketics]

I am fine with the line up which is playing. Only replacement I would make is Bumrah coming in for either of the two pacers when fit as Bumrah should be sure start every t20 whenever fit.

 

[Khota]

Bats lost the last game. Only two changes needed Sharma and Dhoni out and Karthick and the next best bat in.

 

Borrowing a term from baseball rohit has become a 5 'o' clock hitter. He does well in practise games and is a no show for important games.

 

Would not be a bad idea to get a pure bowler in for Pandya but he was not bad last time.

[tweaker]

Chahar playing today

[tweaker]

4 hours ago, tweaker said:

Today the team management should consider Chahar as the 3rd seamer in place of Hardik

Chahar has been selected today