Jump to content

Performances of Batsmen


Recommended Posts

On 12/29/2023 at 2:13 AM, rollingstoned said:

Gill and Iyer's dismissals seems to indicate that they are both still in ODI mode. Jaiswal too was being a bit too flashy in his strokeplay for an overseas debutant trying to hit on the up through covers. You look at how many of the Saf batsmen played and they were very compact. Kohli even in the 2nd innings was trying to feel for balls on the 6th stump but I won't criticize him too much for it.

That's why I hate playe LOI before a test series. What's more important. Jamodi or tests? They should be practising vs some A teams or like local leagues in first class prior to test series. 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, harpicP said:

That's why I hate playe LOI before a test series. What's more important. Jamodi or tests? They should be practising vs some A teams or like local leagues in first class prior to test series. 

Lol coaching staff for this series was only retained after wc due to short notice so you get an idea of the level of preparation they had before a big tour. I'm sure they collectively decided to just wing it, something which is okay for the white ball series but not tests. 

Link to comment
14 minutes ago, express bowling said:

Just loved the pull shot for 6 by Sarfraz against the quickest test pacer, Mark Wood, on a zippy surface. 

 

There was a lofted drive over Wood's head and a ramp shot for 4s too.

 

Want our newbie batters to tackle high pace, steep bounce, genuine spin and true swing too. 

 

He also sweeps very well, which is rare for Indian bats. Our bats get stuck vs spinners

Link to comment

Series evaluation:

 

Jaiswal: magnificent, and perhaps the main reason for winning the series. However, his habit of throwing away his wicket seems worrisome overseas. of the 9 innings, he threw away his wicket about 50% of the time.

rohit: underwhelming and tentative first 2 tests, but looked more like his old self in last 3 tests. his powers are on the wane.

Gill: pleasantly surprised by his application. I was a harsh critic of both technique and temperament. he still has holes in the former, but has improved the latter. did little of note in the 1st test, but was very good the next 4 tests.

Jadeja: had 2 valuable innings of note where he looked compact and organized, but has looked shaky otherwise. keeps going into a shell, and making very poor batting or running decisions.

sarfaraz: looks excellent vs spin, but on tracks that do not turn a lot. on the 1 track that was closer to a genuine turner, he looked rather tentative. played pace quite well, but his unorthodox methods will be tested overseas

Jor-el (Jurel): in terms of temperament, perhaps the most impressive of the lot, even more than jaiswal. very calm and collected. displayed both sound defense and a wide range of attacking strokes.

axar: good for making 20s to 40s, but not more. his bowling is very pedestrian, and his batting should not compensate for the bowling.

ashwin: huge decline with the bat. did little of note barring a couple of 25+ scores. does not seem that interested in batting any more. should play at 9 and no higher.

kela: played well in his only test, but threw away his wicket under duress as expected.

Iyer: uninterested and unsuitable for tests. seems to favor flashy 30s instead of big scores.

kuldeep: the most improved batter, more so than even gill. went from looking like a no. 11 batter before the series to a no. 9 or even no. 8 batter. solid defense and sound temperament. should work on adding a few strokes and strike rotation.

padikkal: has a worrying tendency to stay camped on back foot, but still seems to use his long reach. not fully sold on him, but seems a decent backup batter for home conditions.

bharath & patidar: less said the better

Edited by Vijy
Link to comment
2 hours ago, Vijy said:

Series evaluation:

 

Jaiswal: magnificent, and perhaps the main reason for winning the series. However, his habit of throwing away his wicket seems worrisome overseas. of the 9 innings, he threw away his wicket about 50% of the time.

rohit: underwhelming and tentative first 2 tests, but looked more like his old self in last 3 tests. his powers are on the wane.

Gill: pleasantly surprised by his application. I was a harsh critic of both technique and temperament. he still has holes in the former, but has improved the latter. did little of note in the 1st test, but was good the next 4 tests.

Jadeja: had 2 valuable innings of note where he looked compact and organized, but has looked shaky otherwise. keeps going into a shell, and making very poor batting or running decisions.

sarfaraz: looks excellent vs spin, but on tracks that do not turn a lot. on the 1 track that was closer to a genuine turner, he looked rather tentative. played pace quite well, but his unorthodox methods will be tested overseas

Jor-el (Jurel): in terms of temperament, perhaps the most impressive of the lot, even more than jaiswal. very calm and collected. displayed both sound defense and a wide range of attacking strokes.

axar: good for making 20s to 40s, but not more. his bowling is very pedestrian, and his batting should not compensate for the bowling.

ashwin: huge decline with the bat. did little of note barring a couple of 25+ scores. does not seem that interested in batting any more. should play at 9 and no higher.

kela: played well in his only test, but threw away his wicket under duress as expected.

Iyer: uninterested and unsuitable for tests. seems to favor flashy 30s instead of big scores.

kuldeep: the most improved batter, more so than even gill. went from looking like a no. 11 batter before the series to a no. 9 or even no. 8 batter. solid defense and sound temperament. should work on adding a few strokes and strike rotation.

padikkal: has a worrying tendency to stay camped on back foot, but still seems to use his long reach. not fully sold on him, but seems a decent backup batter for home conditions.

bharath & patidar: less said the better

Excellent analysis

Gill still has that loose technique which he shows in the run of  play

His lack of foot work,overly committed front foot,cemented backfoot,sideways trigger prop up just as I said , every now and then, probably with lapse in concentration

Need to shred the habit putting off the foot once the opposition is down

Killer instincts missing

Link to comment
9 hours ago, Suhaan said:

Excellent analysis

Gill still has that loose technique which he shows in the run of  play

His lack of foot work,overly committed front foot,cemented backfoot,sideways trigger prop up just as I said , every now and then, probably with lapse in concentration

Need to shred the habit putting off the foot once the opposition is down

Killer instincts missing

yeah, he is still very much a work in progress. but the way he responded after the 1st test was heartening. he needs to avoid complacency and work hard on rectifying his many technical flaws. needs to stop that front foot plonking like kohli

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...