Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Vilander said:

Indians are racially caucosoid. By race you mean skin tone. But thats not true many here as a sample seem to like latinas and africans..which are brown to dark brown tones..

Indians may be caucasoid but they look nothing like Swedes, Spaniards, Arabs. They have a distinct look.

 

What is a latina? Is it a white Spaniard or a red indian from South America?

Posted
15 minutes ago, Ranvir said:

Indians may be caucasoid but they look nothing like Swedes, Spaniards, Arabs. They have a distinct look.

 

What is a latina? Is it a white Spaniard or a red indian from South America?

Mixture of both.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Stradlater said:

Mixture of both.

So a person of pure Spanish ancestory who is born in South America cannot be a Latina?

Edited by Ranvir
Posted
5 hours ago, Ranvir said:

Indians may be caucasoid but they look nothing like Swedes, Spaniards, Arabs. They have a distinct look.

 

What is a latina? Is it a white Spaniard or a red indian from South America?

basically the only point relevant is , i think there is no skin tone bias here, as far as i can tell. 

Posted
7 hours ago, Ranvir said:

So a person of pure Spanish ancestory who is born in South America cannot be a Latina?

Mostly they are hybrids. But these days Latin America has political connotations too so I guess he can.

×
×
  • Create New...