Khota Posted February 15, 2019 Author Share Posted February 15, 2019 3 minutes ago, Rightarmfast said: I havent watched Sobers, however I did watch Kapil post 82-83 onwards. There was something common between Chris Cairns, Heath Streak, Abdur razzaq or even Wasim Akram. And that is they were experts in atleast one of the discipline. Even without batting, Chris Cairns was still NZ's front line bowler, as was Heath Streak for Zim, Wasim for Pak. There was a definite contribution from them. Sure, they might have had an off day here or there. Whereas, no matter Pandya improving his strike rate from 88 to 55, theres no one discipline he could be said to be a master of. He is a poor jack in both the trades. Indian test team doesnt need him as a bowler, because there are way better bowlers, neither a batsman coz he can do jacksh*t. You are right in saying its unfair to compare Pandya, but the thing is, you have to look at things from a perspective. You cant experiment with a player at the cost of the team! That is something others are missing. pandys as of today cannot reliabley take wkts. Rightarmfast 1 Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 Just now, Khota said: none of the above is playing tests. fact. Pandya is in test squad, soon shaknar wud be - wrong fact Just now, Khota said: 2 out of 3 wont be playing odi. fact. shankar n pandya are in ODI squad- so wrong fact Just now, Khota said: t20 the jury is still out . fact. all 3 play t20 Switchblade and philcric 2 Link to comment
Khota Posted February 15, 2019 Author Share Posted February 15, 2019 56 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: Pandya is in test squad, soon shaknar wud be - wrong fact shankar n pandya are in ODI squad- so wrong fact all 3 play t20 Playing and keeping a deserving person away is not the same thing. Playing and contributing is what counts. Rightarmfast 1 Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Khota said: Playing and keeping a deserving person away is not the same thing. Playing and contributing is what counts. deserving who ? Link to comment
Khota Posted February 15, 2019 Author Share Posted February 15, 2019 12 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: deserving who ? Shankar came is an allrounder but does not bowl. Is that not keeping a pure bat out? Link to comment
Straight Drive Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 2 hours ago, putrevus said: Regarding Holders batting, I think he is an asset at no 8 any higher than 8 would be too high for him.He always could bat , He scored 100 against England three years back too.But the transformation in his bowling has made him a force in my view. I guess he has added some pace as well he is more consistent on off stump line than be ever was. As you mentioned above, he already had a test 100 prior to the double. Plus he also has the captaincy experience. Ticks all the boxes. putrevus 1 Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 33 minutes ago, Khota said: Shankar came is an allrounder but does not bowl. Is that not keeping a pure bat out? shankar is a pure batsman who can bowl 1st thing, he batted better then anyone in that last ODi ...was the highest scorer in last t20 as well. Ppl need to understand he is a batsman who can bowl ,he is good enough to play as batsman only. Link to comment
Rightarmfast Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 You can take a horse to water, you cant make it drink! @Khota Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 3 minutes ago, Rightarmfast said: You can take a horse to water, you cant make it drink! @Khota erre wah we have another sidhu, thokko taali Link to comment
Khota Posted February 15, 2019 Author Share Posted February 15, 2019 31 minutes ago, Rightarmfast said: You can take a horse to water, you cant make it drink! @Khota Especially a stubborn one. More like a mule it is Link to comment
Straight Drive Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 2 hours ago, Rightarmfast said: I havent watched Sobers, however I did watch Kapil post 82-83 onwards. There was something common between Chris Cairns, Heath Streak, Abdur razzaq or even Wasim Akram. And that is they were experts in atleast one of the discipline. Even without batting, Chris Cairns was still NZ's front line bowler, as was Heath Streak for Zim, Wasim for Pak. There was a definite contribution from them. Sure, they might have had an off day here or there. Whereas, no matter Pandya improving his strike rate from 88 to 55, theres no one discipline he could be said to be a master of. He is a poor jack in both the trades. Indian test team doesnt need him as a bowler, because there are way better bowlers, neither a batsman coz he can do jacksh*t. You are right in saying its unfair to compare Pandya, but the thing is, you have to look at things from a perspective. You cant experiment with a player at the cost of the team! (1) The point about having a strong skill, in tests , has been talked repeatedly and is a valid one. (2) Kohli did not keep experimenting at cost of team. He stopped the experiment when crucial matches came. He did drop Pandya when he realized it was an historic series to win against Australia in Australia. Link to comment
Khota Posted February 15, 2019 Author Share Posted February 15, 2019 1 hour ago, Straight Drive said: (1) The point about having a strong skill, in tests , has been talked repeatedly and is a valid one. (2) Kohli did not keep experimenting at cost of team. He stopped the experiment when crucial matches came. He did drop Pandya when he realized it was an historic series to win against Australia in Australia. And we need to give Kohli credit for dropping Pandya. Link to comment
Straight Drive Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 4 minutes ago, Khota said: And we need to give Kohli credit for dropping Pandya. Khota Bhai aapke sath ek topic pe 100 post debate karne ka time mere pass nahi. Please trigger someone else. Don't lay this traps for me. Switchblade, philcric and zen 3 Link to comment
Khota Posted February 15, 2019 Author Share Posted February 15, 2019 3 hours ago, Straight Drive said: Khota Bhai aapke sath ek topic pe 100 post debate karne ka time mere pass nahi. Please trigger someone else. Don't lay this traps for me. agar time nahin to kya kare ho idhar. aap ek zanax le lein to theek feel karenge. Link to comment
Rightarmfast Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 5 hours ago, Straight Drive said: (1) The point about having a strong skill, in tests , has been talked repeatedly and is a valid one. (2) Kohli did not keep experimenting at cost of team. He stopped the experiment when crucial matches came. He did drop Pandya when he realized it was an historic series to win against Australia in Australia. What do you mean by crucial matches? The dikkhead Pandya already cost us South Africa and England! It was way too late for kohli. Link to comment
Straight Drive Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Just checked few pages of this thread. The trolling on this thread is immense. Funny how people get wind up so easily. zen 1 Link to comment
sportzcraazy Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 (edited) All-rounders do exist with effective impact. They are the game changer as they do well with bat as well as ball. If we talk about Best all-rounders in the cricket world right now: Rashid Khan (Afghanistan) Shakib Al Hasan (Bangladesh) Mohammad Nabi (Afghanistan) Ravindra Jadeja (India) Mohammad Hafeez (Pakistan) Edited February 16, 2019 by sportzcraazy Straight Drive 1 Link to comment
Rightarmfast Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 (edited) On 2/15/2019 at 11:06 PM, Ankit_sharma03 said: erre wah we have another sidhu, thokko taali Your personal attacks and comebacks are so lame. Just like your logic. Lolz. Anyway, thanks for the laughs! Edited February 17, 2019 by Rightarmfast Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 (edited) On 2/16/2019 at 4:53 AM, Rightarmfast said: What do you mean by crucial matches? The dikkhead Pandya already cost us South Africa and England! It was way too late for kohli. chal point pe attack krta hu How week is ur math??? India lost 2 games in SA out of which Pandya performed in 1....so how did he cost u Sa series . Pujara , dhawan, Rahul, vijay, rohit , keeper didnt perform in any game didnt they cost u the game In england even if u check all lost games , pandya grinded more then others with the bat. HE won u the only game in england and had the best bowling figures in 2nd test so how did he lost u the test ???? He was neither the worst batsman . dhawan(just small knocks), DK , vijay - didnt play a single good innings in england Pujara, rahane were highly inconsistent Pandya alone lost u series Srsly tell me did u even watch those series????? Now before u give Aus series example, again go n watch the diff between pujara, keeper , openers avg in ENG, Sa vs AUS series series and then also see what diff did vihari n rohit did then pandya. What ull see others standing up and vihari n rohit still doing less then pandya. That diff in others avg was the reason. So stop fooling urself Edited February 17, 2019 by Ankit_sharma03 Link to comment
Rightarmfast Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 2 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: chal point pe attack krta hu How week is ur math??? My week in maths is 7 days express bowling and Khota 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now