The Line-belongs-to-the-Batsmen overstepping rule is Anti Fast Bowlers

[Cricketics]

I think rules are rules but I will mention one thing.

 

These days bowlers are charged of overstepping just because foot is clipping or umpire is unsure whether bowler’s part of the shoe was behind or not. That is where bowler needs to be given benifit of doubt and not batsman. 

[Muloghonto]

5 minutes ago, Cricketics said:

I think rules are rules but I will mention onr thing.

 

These days bowlers are charged of overstepping just because foot is clipping or umpire is unsure whether bowler’s part of the sheo was behind or not. That is where bowler needs to be given benift of doubt and not batsman. 

Or we need to get shoe-makers to make a bit more creative 'heel-trail' designs :)

[sandeep]

5 hours ago, Ram said:

Not really. If I want to see people run, I will tune into the track events at Olympics. 

 

Cricket is about Ball Versus Bat, not How much energy a batsmen has left to face the next ball after running 3 runs.. 

Seriously?  Looks like fat uncle just wants to hit the ball and have 'declared' runs.  We used to have that in gully cricket and terrace cricket - hit it past the bowler and its '1d',  hit the wall on the midwicket along the ground and its '2d', hit it flush and it was '4d' and so on.  

[Vilander]

9 hours ago, Ram said:

The Pros will have much better muscle memory than I do

this is very true..you should not extrapolate your inabilities and imagine that everyone will have those or rules of the game ( second most popular in the world) should be changed. so yeah no..

[Vilander]

5 hours ago, Ram said:

Cricket is about Ball Versus Bat

it's about the athletes holding the bat and the ball in their hands and about the duels within the team battles. an insular view again you need lots of education in being a cricket fan.

[Vilander]

no running needed.. 

Spoiler