rkt.india Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 51 minutes ago, Stuge said: Dood,UV was out of form before the WC 2011..You need to back players, who you are testing for so many months or years ,but dropped because of one bad series here are r there. It's sick to see selection committee has stared thinking like ICF at times. Rayudu was just not good enough to handle good fast bowling. Link to comment
kubrickian Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 8 minutes ago, rkt.india said: Rayudu was just not good enough to handle good fast bowling. Then how did he do well in NZ ? Link to comment
rkt.india Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 10 minutes ago, kubrickian said: Then how did he do well in NZ ? Pitches were quite spin friendly. Link to comment
kubrickian Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 1 minute ago, rkt.india said: Pitches were quite spin friendly. There's always pace and bounce in NZ even if they help spinners a bit. Link to comment
Stuge Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 1 hour ago, rkt.india said: Rayudu was just not good enough to handle good fast bowling. Raydu would have better option over VS anyday in the first place itself. TS was crappy to begin with. Link to comment
Stuge Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, kubrickian said: There's always pace and bounce in NZ even if they help spinners a bit. VS was given chance instead of Raydu...WC was being used as some bilateral series. Edited July 14, 2019 by Stuge Link to comment
Vijy Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Stuge said: VS was given chance instead of Raydu...WC was being used as some bilateral series. to rat and bewda's tiny brains, the two (WC vs bilaterals) are synonymous. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 40 minutes ago, Stuge said: VS was given chance instead of Raydu...WC was being used as some bilateral series. VS impressed before WC. He arrested collapse twice. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 (edited) 45 minutes ago, Stuge said: Raydu would have better option over VS anyday in the first place itself. TS was crappy to begin with. We didn't lose because of VS. we lost because we were 24/4. If likes of Kohli, Rohit could not do, don't think Rayudu would have done any different. Edited July 14, 2019 by rkt.india Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 45 minutes ago, Stuge said: Raydu would have better option over VS anyday in the first place itself. Everyone on bench looks better. Lets not forget When it jaggs around rayudu is one of the worse Rayudu was troubled by Zimbabwe trundlers when it jagged around....imagine what henry, boult, fergueson wud have done Rayudu was made to dance twice in Australia, by Australia in India and seamer in Ipl when pitches had a bit to offer Also When we lost to Eng .... VS didnt even play When bhuvi got injured it was VS that took 2 wkts ......Rayudu wud have been of no use Now coming to rayudu fielding.....their is thread in which we hve counted he has lost 50 runs while fielding. So imagine the runs he wud have made us suffer in fielding Laughable how ppl start to think person who isnt avl is better when that same person lost his place after giving poor perfomances saik and vijay50 1 1 Link to comment
Stuge Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 6 minutes ago, rkt.india said: We didn't lose because of VS. we lost because we were 24/4. If likes of Kohli, Rohit could not do, don't think Rayudu would have done any different. we lost because of shitty MO ... Champion teams rise from such situations that why Australia was dominant for so many years. Link to comment
rkt.india Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Stuge said: we lost because of shitty MO ... Champion teams rise from such situations that why Australia was dominant for so many years. When did Aus do that? 24/4 ke bad middle order bacha kahan Link to comment
Stuge Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 3 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: Laughable how ppl start to think person who isnt avl is better when that same person lost his place after giving poor perfomances Areey bhai,read again... I'm only pointing out what a **** selection committee is in general.Too much time was wasted on backing certain players ,but same players who they trusted so much were not given chance.That was my point. To he honest ,I was surprised to see in India semis . Link to comment
Stuge Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 (edited) 18 minutes ago, rkt.india said: When did Aus do that? 24/4 ke bad middle order bacha kahan https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/8039/scorecard/65279/australia-vs-new-zealand-5th-super-icc-world-cup-2002-03 Yes ,they batted first but they were 47/4 at one stage( current Indian team would have bundled out for 150 or so) still they managed to make a match out it shows character of Australia during that time . Yeh wala bhi lelo match where Australia was in do or die situation against Africa https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/8039/scorecard/65231/australia-vs-south-africa-9th-super-icc-world-cup-1999 My point is you need belief and players who can rise to the occasion .....I felt we lacked that . Edited July 14, 2019 by Stuge Link to comment
diga Posted July 14, 2019 Share Posted July 14, 2019 Too much power vested with Virat in player/coach/support staff selection... Split captaincy between test & limited overs format is the only way to curtail Virats powers. Short term Pujara should take up test captaincy Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now