Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

 

 

In the same breath that Pakistanis chest-beat and hurl abuses at India for "rights violations" in J&K, they are busy resorting to worse treatment of their own population.   And yet, even the most "liberal" of Pakistanis has to recite accusations against India.   Why is it OK for Pakistani govt to take the same legal and security measures on their own people, but not OK for the Indian govt to take similar steps to fight insurgency?  

Posted
13 hours ago, G_B_ said:

pashtuns have been punjabi cannon fodder for hundreds of years. Nothing new...

Correct, Pathans are the donkeys of Punjabistan. Dumb and Backward people who are being used by their Elite Punjabi masters .

Posted

This treatment of Pashtuns and Balochis in Pakistan stems from the inferiority complex that the Punjabis and sindhis feel towards them. Pakjabis can't bear the fact that the Pathans are a pure Islamic race while they are the second class converts of the subcontinent with Hindu surnames like Rajput, Butt , Chowdary etc. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Norman said:

This treatment of Pashtuns and Balochis in Pakistan stems from the inferiority complex that the Punjabis and sindhis feel towards them. Pakjabis can't bear the fact that the Pathans are a pure Islamic race while they are the second class converts of the subcontinent with Hindu surnames like Rajput, Butt , Chowdary etc. 

How the hell are Pathans a pure Islamic race ?? Pashtuns converted to Islam after it started to spread in Sindh. Islam started to spread in Sindh from 750 CE onwards, Pashtuns didn’t convert to Islam till 900s CE when Sebuktajin permanently conquered Ghazni and started conversions in Afghan hinterland 

Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

How the hell are Pathans a pure Islamic race ?? Pashtuns converted to Islam after it started to spread in Sindh. Islam started to spread in Sindh from 750 CE onwards, Pashtuns didn’t convert to Islam till 900s CE when Sebuktajin permanently conquered Ghazni and started conversions in Afghan hinterland 

Pashtuns have been following Islam since 800 CE. Yes they're not Muhammad's followers (the purest of the purest Muslims) but still they have been Muslims for a millenium , which the pakjabis are not. Overwhelming majority of the subcontinent Muslims converted to Islam during Mughal and the British rule (16th to 19th centuries) and hence feel inferior to  Pathans. That's the reason for so many fake "khans"  in the SC. 

Edited by Norman
Posted
1 hour ago, Norman said:

Pashtuns have been following Islam since 800 CE. Yes they're not Muhammad's followers (the purest of the purest Muslims) but still they have been Muslims for a millenium , which the pakjabis are not. Overwhelming majority of the subcontinent Muslims converted to Islam during Mughal and the British rule (16th to 19th centuries) and hence feel inferior to  Pathans. That's the reason for so many fake "khans"  in the SC. 

Dude that’s wrong. Pashtuns were not Muslim’s by 800, they only became muslims in 900. And unless you are a mongol or a Turk, you are a fake khan. That includes Pashtuns 

×
×
  • Create New...