Jump to content

Would it be fair to say Nadeem has out performed Ashwin


Khota

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Khota said:

 

It seems you are the one getting worked up since you responded to your own post

3 hours ago, Khota said:

Since when has most posters replaced sound scientific reasoning?

 

17 hours ago, Khota said:

What do you guys think?

No stats to back it up but uses the fancy term "scientific reasoning" prefaced with the topic heading shown above. Asking a question is asking others to give their opinion and opinions are not facts. Thereby I question your "scientific reasoning"

Link to comment
1 hour ago, raki05 said:

Every match? Isn't it true for Kohli ,Pujara and Mayank also, if they are better they should have scored more than Umesh.

The point I am driving home is that thisone test is not an anamoly. Nadeem along with half a dozen others can out prrform Ashwin.

Link to comment
6 hours ago, gakgupta said:

yes..he was better than ashwin and also jadeja...

 

I feel the management is slowly sidelining Ashwin...somehow, i got this feeling after this match...

If this is so, then its a huge mistake...

Ashwin is no:1 spinner in the world and only improved in last 3 to 4 years..

He is not no. 1 in India. That does not make him no 1 in the world.

Link to comment
5 hours ago, Real McCoy said:

It seems you are the one getting worked up since you responded to your own post

 

No stats to back it up but uses the fancy term "scientific reasoning" prefaced with the topic heading shown above. Asking a question is asking others to give their opinion and opinions are not facts. Thereby I question your "scientific reasoning"

Nadeem almost half the overs and twice the wkts. I would say he is better.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, raki05 said:

Every match? Isn't it true for Kohli ,Pujara and Mayank also, if they are better they should have scored more than Umesh.

This will be more like a trend if Nadeem gets an opportunity.

Edited by Khota
Link to comment
10 minutes ago, Khota said:

The point I am driving home is that thisone test is not an anamoly. Nadeem along with half a dozen others can out prrform Ashwin.

That's just your assumption not even potentially true as the other person whom you are talking about is fastest to reach 350 wickets. Now have you said they can perform better than him would have still not make sense but it had potential.

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, raki05 said:

Than it would be awesome I want him to perform as well but more in overseas test coz in home test Ashwin and jadega are real beast.

Atleast you are open minded and I applaud that. As far as home conditions are concerned I think there are 5 better than Ashwin.

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, Khota said:

Nadeem almost half the overs and twice the wkts. I would say he is better.

atleast let me him play 50% of what ashwin has played

u dnt get 350+ wkts in record number of time like that easily.....

 

if one games starts to decide better bowler well as i shown above sehwag, yuvi outbowled bhajji many times. It isnt that in that one game also he ran through the batting lineup.....

If someone has to make a headline for this game it shud be

seamers outbowls spinner

or better

seamers didnt leave much for spinners

Link to comment

Bowler A:

 

Fewer overs, x4 more wkts, better economy.

 

Bowler B:

 

x2 more overs, 1/4th wkts, worse economy.

 

Who is better?

 

Conventional wisdom: Bowler A

 

ICF experts: Bowler B

 

Bowler B is Ashwin and Bowler B is Nadeem.

 

I am sitting and laughing.

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

atleast let me him play 50% of what ashwin has played

u dnt get 350+ wkts in record number of time like that easily.....

 

if one games starts to decide better bowler well as i shown above sehwag, yuvi outbowled bhajji many times. It isnt that in that one game also he ran through the batting lineup.....

If someone has to make a headline for this game it shud be

seamers outbowls spinner

or better

seamers didnt leave much for spinners

Planets were aligned for him properly. Your arguments are just that, arguements.

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

u cant even name those 5

yet no ones domestic record comes close to his international record

You just saw one. I was confident enough that he will outperform Ashwin before the first ball was on.

Link to comment
Just now, Khota said:

Bowler A:

 

Fewer overs, x4 more wkts, better economy.

 

Bowler B:

 

x2 more overs, 1/4th wkts, worse economy.

 

Who is better?

 

Conventional wisdom: Bowler A

 

ICF experts: Bowler B

 

Bowler B is Ashwin and Bowler B is Nadeem.

 

I am sitting and laughing.

BOWLING O M R W ECON WD NB  
JN Gillespie 15 1 47 0 3.13 0 0  
NM Hauritz 22 4 87 2 3.95 0 0  
GD McGrath 12 6 29 2 2.41 0 0  
MS Kasprowicz 13 5 29 0 2.23 0 0  
MJ Clarke 6.2 0 9 6 1.42 0

 

BOWLING O M R W ECON WD NB  
Z Khan 6 0 10 1 1.66 0 1  
Harbhajan Singh 21 4 53 0 2.52 0 0  
A Kumble 19 0 90 5 4.73 0 0  
M Kartik 15.3 1 44 4 2.83 0 3

 

By ur logic- michael clarke was a better bowler then - kumble , bhajji, kartik

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...