Hindu Hatred archive

[coffee_rules]

44 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

 

So, it seems you don't have information, you simply believed some random tweet, posted it on ICF and want ICFers to not only read and believe it, but form opinion on some guesswork.

 

Additionally it is some social media comment, it can be taken upto Facebook to take action.

 

Similarly, comments on twitter can also be reported.

 

What can ICF do about it?

Most of the election threads are random tweets from Rs200 ITCell activists and they are not verified information. What can ICF do about election discussions? We can avoid personal abuses of bigoted nature or stereotype larger populace

[EnterTheVoid]

6 hours ago, sandeep said:

Your agenda is very obvious from your repeated attempts to do "missionary" work in spreading your particular brand of angst.  Consider this a soft warning. 

 

You are free to have "strong" opinions and discuss them. You are not free to hurl bigoted vomit and make generalized statements.  

 

Well said mate.

 

He only speaks for himself with his bigoted views. Unfortunately, he keeps spouting "Hindus this and Hindus that" - I don't want to be associated with him or people like him. I wouldn't be wrong in saying others probably feel the same.

[EnterTheVoid]

9 hours ago, PunterLog said:

What's the prurpose of having a chit-chat section?

 

Not for people like you to post random, unverified nonsense that you read on the Internet.

 

 

Edited April 4, 2021 by EnterTheVoid

[PunterLog]

8 hours ago, EnterTheVoid said:

 

Well said mate.

 

He only speaks for himself with his bigoted views. Unfortunately, he keeps spouting "Hindus this and Hindus that" - I don't want to be associated with him or people like him. I wouldn't be wrong in saying others probably feel the same.

Who's forcing you LOL?

 

Who made you the representation of all Hindus?

8 hours ago, EnterTheVoid said:

 

Not for people like you to post random, unverified nonsense that you read on the Internet.

There's plenty of verified stuff which mainstream media would never cover. When the next Kashmir or Direct Action day happens, it'll be because of people like you who refuse to see reality and believe that all is well.

[sandeep]

12 hours ago, PunterLog said:

 

Yeah, Indian Muslims are somehow magically going to be the one exception to the norm. They aren't like Pakistani Muslims, Bangladeshi Muslims or Afghan Muslims. They'll magically be secular and tolerant towards Kuffars going against the Quran.

 

When was the last time Indian Muslims talked about the plight of minorities in Pakistan, Bangladesh or Afghanistan? They have no problem talking about Palestine Muslims.

 

Keep living in woke land but remember that you are a Kuffar all the same.

Pretty rich coming from a guy who has the time to moderate an Internet forum.

 

To you, RW's are monkeys who fling vile insults. To me, liberals like you are spineless losers who don't have the balls to criticize Islamists.

 

Imagine equating Ajmal Kasab with RW poster on an Internet forum. You probably think RSS is just as bad as ISIS as well.

 

 

just a bunch of strawman arguments, followed by more strawmen.  Pathetic.  None of what you attribute to me, is at all what I stand for.  And calling yourself "RW" is an insult to actual right wingers.  

[PunterLog]

50 minutes ago, sandeep said:

just a bunch of strawman arguments, followed by more strawmen.  Pathetic.  None of what you attribute to me, is at all what I stand for.  And calling yourself "RW" is an insult to actual right wingers.  

RW isn't a monolith.

[EnterTheVoid]

1 hour ago, PunterLog said:

Who's forcing you LOL?

 

Who made you the representation of all Hindus?

 

I was about to ask you the same question. 

 

Speak for yourself. You ain't speaking for me, not with your "Hindus this" and "Hindus that" generalisations.

 

I believe @sandeep made the site policy very clear to you. Didn't you get the memo?

[PunterLog]

4 minutes ago, EnterTheVoid said:

Speak for yourself. You ain't speaking for me, not with your "Hindus this" and "Hindus that" generalisations.

 

I believe @sandeep made the site policy very clear to you. Didn't you get the memo?

 

What? You don't make any sense. When Hindu festivals or Hindu temples are targetted, I shouldn't use the word "Hindu"?

 

What @sandeepsaid makes sense. But, what you are saying makes exactly zero sense.

 

Also, if you don't want to be associated with the thread, then stay away from it. I'm not forcing you to react or respond am I?

[EnterTheVoid]

I don't think you understand what generalisations mean. 

 

You generalise against Hindus. You generalise against Muslims.

 

Like every nut job, you think you're on the righteous path. All these extremists are cut from the same cloth. Just a different colour. 

Edited April 4, 2021 by EnterTheVoid

[EnterTheVoid]

1 hour ago, sandeep said:

just a bunch of strawman arguments, followed by more strawmen.  Pathetic.  None of what you attribute to me, is at all what I stand for.  And calling yourself "RW" is an insult to actual right wingers.  

 

Internet Warriors mate.

[PunterLog]

3 minutes ago, EnterTheVoid said:

I don't think you understand what generalisations mean. 

 

You generalise against Hindus. You generalise against Muslims.

 

Of course, only a fool would think every person belonging to a group would fit the stereotype.

 

When I say, Muslims don't care about minority Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh, it doesn't mean every single Muslim doesn't care. It just means that enough Muslims don't care.

 

Quote

Like every nut job, you think you're on the righteous path.

I don't think I'm on the righteous path you nutter! I've mentioned multiple times that I'm being extremely biased towards Hindus.

Quote

All these extremists are cut from the same cloth. Just a different colour. 

Again!

 

You are probably one of those guys who thinks RSS is just as bad as ISIS.

Quote

Internet Warriors mate.

Is this supposed to be an insult?

 

99.9% of humans can't do anything other than being Internet warriors.

[EnterTheVoid]

Last I checked, I wasn't the one being warned for making generalisations. 

 

You've been warned against it by many people. On many different occasions. 

 

Blind Freddy and his dog can see what you can't see. 

Edited April 4, 2021 by EnterTheVoid

[PunterLog]

1 minute ago, EnterTheVoid said:

Last I checked, I wasn't the one being warned for making generalisations. 

 

You've been warned against it by many people. On many different occasions. 

 

Blind Freddy and his dog can see what you can't see. 

 

Last I checked, you weren't posting any content but just arguing. So, of course you won't get any warnings.

 

If I made a detailed post as to why Hindu % in Bangladesh went from 22% in 1951 census to 8% in 2011 census, I'll probably get warned as well as I'll post about the activities of Islamist organizations in Bangladesh.

 

Liberals will probably find it "Islamophobic" if the reality of Islamist behavior while in majority gets exposed.

[EnterTheVoid]

Whatever, Mr Computer Warrior.

 

Can't imagine your bigoted nonsense being tolerated much longer. Sooner or later, you'll be given the flick. 

[PunterLog]

1 minute ago, EnterTheVoid said:

Whatever, Mr Computer Warrior.

 

Can't imagine your bigoted nonsense being tolerated much longer. Sooner or later, you'll be given the flick. 

You seriously think I care about getting banned from an Internet forum? I haven't broken any rules but I've simply brought up some uncomfortable topics.

 

It just proves that Indians are spineless and have zero balls to talk about problematic stuff in Islamic theology.

 

What's your opinion on this verse from the Quran? Do you consider it bigotry or would you say I'm being Islamophobic for posting such verses from the Quran.

 

Quote

9:5 And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.

 

[EnterTheVoid]

This forum probably isn't for you. 

[PunterLog]

1 minute ago, EnterTheVoid said:

This forum probably isn't for you. 

So, you find bigotry in my posts but you can't even openly admit that Quran is full of bigotry even when I post the verses.

 

Typical double standards

[sandeep]

11 hours ago, PunterLog said:

RW isn't a monolith.

Nothing on the political spectrum is a "monolith".  Each side attracts its share of fools.  You are an appropriate example of that.

[sandeep]

10 hours ago, EnterTheVoid said:

Last I checked, I wasn't the one being warned for making generalisations. 

 

You've been warned against it by many people. On many different occasions. 

 

Blind Freddy and his dog can see what you can't see. 

I don't think he's stupid enough to "not see" it.  He feels entitled to his prejudice and "justified" in making "edgy" statements.  Lot of self-described RW folks think they are  saying "hard hitting" truths, when in reality they are indulging their baser instincts in **** flinging.  Nobody needs their "edgy" insight to identify the issues that face Hindus, or the known issues with selective outrage and biases present in the muslim community - in any country.  They are simply using those things as an excuse to vomit bigotry.  You aren't the brave 'warrior' belling the cat, you are just a mirror image of the biased folks in the opposite 'camp'.  

[coffee_rules]

Equating Hindu Dharmic bigotry to Islamic bigotry is a pitfall. All the former does is harp on the double standard with some crass language which will be labeled as ethno-centrism or xenophobic, modern word - Islamophobia!  The best way to shut up any debate.
 

Nothing in west is worse than being labeled a Nazi or White- Supremacist! Islamic-Supremacists are kosher.

 

Hence , any pointing to these double standards can be called that you are equivalent to the other side.  The worst case scenario for Islamic bigotry leads to terrorism, beheading and being destined to rot in hell.

 

In the worst case scenario, It is evident , what the Islamist RW side does, kill all opposition to their ideology - moderates. seculars, LeLis first and then the so-called bigots like RWers of the other kind labeled by the same LeLis. 
 

In school debates, we always think of worst case scenarios. We never label the other side as bigots. Those rules don’t apply in real-life. 
 

Stop the name-calling and labeling on both sides, can we? Very easy thing to make a point.

Edited April 4, 2021 by coffee_rules