Hindu Hatred archive

[PunterLog]

India is a so called secular country where apparently minorities are in danger. "Hinduphobia" isn't even considered a valid concept.

 

I'll be archiving instances of bigotry shown towards Hindus in this thread.

 

Edited March 28, 2021 by PunterLog

[coffee_rules]

There was another thread on the same, that I was posting. In India, only a Akhlaq, Junaid is outraged, although it is bad, the Hindu loss of life is ignored quoting Bajrang Dal activist or RSS. As if their lives dont matter

Edited February 12, 2021 by coffee_rules

[PunterLog]

A mob of 16+ Muslims enters the house of a Hindu guy named "Rinku Sharma" and stabs him to death.

 

 

Here's a "moderate" Indian Muslim woman more or less saying that he deserves to die.

 

 

 

If you thought her hatred was for only "Bajrang Dal" activists then see the tweet below.

 

 

She's "outraged" that there are so many Hindus in India.

 

You thought that was bad? See this below!

 

But, I thought Muslims were in danger in India.

 

Is this how a scared minority behaves?

[PunterLog]

2 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

There was another thread on the same, that I was posting. In India, only a Akhlaq, Junaid is outraged, although it is bad, the Hindu loss of life is ignored quoting Bajrang Dal activist or RSS. As if their lives dont matter

 

Hindu haters use Bajrang Dal, RSS, Brahmin etc as a forefront. They can't outright say "All Hindus" in public.

 

 

 

Did you notice how she used "Bajrang Dal" to justify Rinku's murder but her true face comes out in a previous tweet i.e "More Hindus in India".

[Yoda-esque]

Am not sure what it's is about Sanatanis ( I refuse to use the word Hindu as it is nothing but a term provided by the barbarians) that makes people hate them.

There really is no solution to this.

[Clarke]

11 minutes ago, Yoda-esque said:

Am not sure what it's is about Sanatanis ( I refuse to use the word Hindu as it is nothing but a term provided by the barbarians) that makes people hate them.

There really is no solution to this.

 

Holy books have mention of unbelievers, at least in terms of what awaits them post life on earth and then some "context" related advice on dealing (that's a diplomatic word) with them. Its a good thing we don't live in those ages where those texts were taken literally. 

Edited February 12, 2021 by Clarke

[Yoda-esque]

 
Holy books have mention of unbelievers, at least in terms of what awaits them post life on earth and then some "context" related advice on dealing (that's a diplomatic word) with them. Its a good thing we don't live in those ages where those texts were taken literally. 

We don't?Are you sure?

All religions apart from Sanatani have tests with inviolable dogmas,and I believe they are followed to a T.

If there was no govt,you would know.

[Clarke]

11 minutes ago, Yoda-esque said:

We don't?Are you sure?

All religions apart from Sanatani have tests with inviolable dogmas,and I believe they are followed to a T.

If there was no govt,you would know.

 

I meant it's nothing like the crusades & other holy wars. I'll admit Kashmir is an exception to that.

[Yoda-esque]

 
I meant it's nothing like the crusades & other holy wars. I'll admit Kashmir is an exception to that.

Take a gander down south to see mass conversions...even temple land is being captured to build other structures

[Yoda-esque]

Also here's the historical reason.

When the Delhi sultanate and later on the Mughals,invaded India..their hierarchy in the court and social life was such.

Persians ruled the roost ,they looked down upon the timuruds who looked down upon turks who looked down upon afghans who looked down upon indian converts who looked down upon Sanatanis.

So for almost 700 years, we have been harboring a feeling of low self esteem coupled with stockholm syndrome.This feeling is mostly visible in the gangetic plains and punjab.Even today punjabis sympathize more with lahoris ,bengalis with nawabi and Brit culture and delhis with Mughals.When you look down upon your own culture,why blame others?

[maniac]

23 minutes ago, Yoda-esque said:

1 hour ago, Clarke said:

 
I meant it's nothing like the crusades & other holy wars. I'll admit Kashmir is an exception to that.

Take a gander down south to see mass conversions...even temple land is being captured to build other structures

One of the richest pilgrimage centers in the world probably in the league of Mecca and Vatican: Tirupati’s head is a Christian guy related to Jagan Reddy.

 

What they tell you is how priests discriminated and dominated the religion a 1000 years back but no one talks about one of the richest pilgrimage places in the world like Tirupati not even having decent  facilities for devotees which is managed by state government in the last 70+ Years. 
 

Mukesh Ambani alone donates a lot to the temple every year and is an ardent devotee, why isn’t anyone from that family in the temple trust?

 

Obviously this is rhetoric which we all know about but it feels good to whine, as that’s the best we can do.

[PunterLog]

6 minutes ago, maniac said:

One of the richest pilgrimage centers in the world probably in the league of Mecca and Vatican: Tirupati’s head is a Christian guy related to Jagan Reddy.

 

What they tell you is how priests discriminated and dominated the religion a 1000 years back but no one talks about one of the richest pilgrimage places in the world like Tirupati not even having decent  facilities for devotees which is managed by state government in the last 70+ Years. 
 

Mukesh Ambani alone donates a lot to the temple every year and is an ardent devotee, why isn’t anyone from that family in the temple trust?

 

Obviously this is rhetoric which we all know about but it feels good to whine, as that’s the best we can do.

 

I live in Tirupati. Used to visit the temple multiple times every year with my family as a kid. I haven't visited it in the last 8 years though I live in the same city.

 

I see Christian missionaries taking rallies in the city.

 

Temples MUST be released from state control for Hinduism to survive in this country.

[LordPrabhzy]

17 minutes ago, PunterLog said:

 

I live in Tirupati. Used to visit the temple multiple times every year with my family as a kid. I haven't visited it in the last 8 years though I live in the same city.

 

I see Christian missionaries taking rallies in the city.

 

Temples MUST be released from state control for Hinduism to survive in this country.

 

 

I saw an interesting take on this in String- he said the reason that despite the Gov using funds from their temple controls to provide a lot of free stuff and subsidies to poor people. Now imagine they have no control, which means no subsidies for poor people which makes them even a bigger target for conversions but Christian missionaries and islamic charities exploiting their circumstances.

[PunterLog]

4 minutes ago, LordPrabhzy said:

I saw an interesting take on this in String- he said the reason that despite the Gov using funds from their temple controls to provide a lot of free stuff and subsidies to poor people. Now imagine they have no control, which means no subsidies for poor people which makes them even a bigger target for conversions but Christian missionaries and islamic charities exploiting their circumstances.

I like String but I disagree with that take.

 

Hindu temples if they are free from govenment control, will do a much better job than Christian Missionaries or Islamic charities at helping people.

 

I think the government simply doesn't want to lose the revenue from temples.

[coffee_rules]

Aapke janeu aur tilak ki raksha karne  ke liye guru shaheed ho gaye. Guru Gobind had a war cry of Durga, he proudly wore Tilak too.

Look at the supremacist views and justifying for raising nishan sahib on the Red Fort. Let's justify all crimes, because they have fought for freedom and for Hindus, balki there was no enimity between the two comminities and helped each other as per History. But the narrative is so one-sided.

 

 

 

 

[Yoda-esque]

Other religions protect their own even if they are wrong....

[Jimmy Cliff]

Change the title to Hindu hatred in India. Phobia hota toh din dahaade aise incidents nahin hote.

[Tibarn]

Phobia is a misused word here. Their hatred is completely understandable. People who want to balkanize the country aren't irrationally afraid of Hinduism. Hinduism is literally the only thing that keeps this country together. Otherwise there is very little in common between people from the different parts of the country. Termites aren't phobic of the trees they fell. 

 

It's the raytas who are naive and think otherwise. 

 

 

Edited February 13, 2021 by Tibarn

[coffee_rules]

Phobia is the word copied from Islamophobia. They are not afraid of Hindus. They hate Hindus, so Hindu hatred is a better choice 

[PunterLog]

9 hours ago, Jimmy Cliff said:

Change the title to Hindu hatred in India. Phobia hota toh din dahaade aise incidents nahin hote.

 

3 hours ago, Tibarn said:

Phobia is a misused word here. Their hatred is completely understandable. People who want to balkanize the country aren't irrationally afraid of Hinduism. Hinduism is literally the only thing that keeps this country together. Otherwise there is very little in common between people from the different parts of the country. Termites aren't phobic of the trees they fell. 

 

It's the raytas who are naive and think otherwise. 

 

 

 

28 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Phobia is the word copied from Islamophobia. They are not afraid of Hindus. They hate Hindus, so Hindu hatred is a better choice 

 

Agreed!

Hatred is a better term than Phobia, edited.