Trichromatic Posted September 4, 2021 Author Posted September 4, 2021 1 hour ago, express bowling said: And as Siraj was looking out of energy in the last test itself, it should have been Prasidh in place of Siraj. Kohli being fast bowler captain is myth.
New guy Posted September 4, 2021 Posted September 4, 2021 (edited) On 7/21/2021 at 11:25 PM, maniac said: Yes. Umesh would have won us a couple of overseas tests in Eng Sa and Nzl Umesh Ishant and Shami should have been one of the greatest top3 test bowling line ups of all time but it’s a good problem to have with the emergence of Bumrah. Now I think he is getting a reality check so time for Bumrah to play country cricket. Not Ranji though. Even though Bhuvi was great in a couple of overseas conditions we have wasted investing in him. It’s like investing 100$ in something and getting $1 return after 20 years. Useless Have you seen yadavs bowling average in NZ and Aus? Bhuvi averages 27 overall, averages 26 in england to yadavs 25, averages 20 in SA, 9 in west indies, 26 at home. so taking a pot shot at him is the stupidiest thing ever. Only one series he ever did bad in tests was australai tour where he bowled in only 1 match with injury Couple of series indeed, bhuvi has excelled in EVERY SINGLE series he has bowled in. Bhuvi could have been our Asif, indian management never gave hin enough chances in tests Edited September 4, 2021 by New guy Samcric 1
rollingstoned Posted September 4, 2021 Posted September 4, 2021 1 hour ago, New guy said: Have you seen yadavs bowling average in NZ and Aus? Bhuvi averages 27 overall, averages 26 in england to yadavs 25, averages 20 in SA, 9 in west indies, 26 at home. so taking a pot shot at him is the stupidiest thing ever. Only one series he ever did bad in tests was australai tour where he bowled in only 1 match with injury Couple of series indeed, bhuvi has excelled in EVERY SINGLE series he has bowled in. Bhuvi could have been our Asif, indian management never gave hin enough chances in tests More than that they weirdly decided to shoehorn him as a white ball specialist. I have always considered him a red ball bowling all rounder the minute i saw him. We did not give him a chance in Saf and the England tour in 2018 was a missed opportunity as well. Somewhere in the middle he became a pace bowler rather than a swing bowler before wisely going back to what he does best. New guy 1
rkt.india Posted September 4, 2021 Posted September 4, 2021 26 minutes ago, rollingstoned said: More than that they weirdly decided to shoehorn him as a white ball specialist. I have always considered him a red ball bowling all rounder the minute i saw him. We did not give him a chance in Saf and the England tour in 2018 was a missed opportunity as well. Somewhere in the middle he became a pace bowler rather than a swing bowler before wisely going back to what he does best. He did play 2/3 tests in SA. On England tour 2018, he got injured in LOIs before tests. Actually, he was carrying injury from IPL. And he has never been fit for a period in last 3 years. New guy 1
New guy Posted September 4, 2021 Posted September 4, 2021 45 minutes ago, rollingstoned said: More than that they weirdly decided to shoehorn him as a white ball specialist. I have always considered him a red ball bowling all rounder the minute i saw him. We did not give him a chance in Saf and the England tour in 2018 was a missed opportunity as well. Somewhere in the middle he became a pace bowler rather than a swing bowler before wisely going back to what he does best. Also, Bhuvi has played 21 tests, while umesh has 49. To say that india invested in bhuvi over Umesh is simply incorrect Samcric 1
rkt.india Posted September 4, 2021 Posted September 4, 2021 https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/eng-vs-ind-4th-test-osman-samiuddin-another-day-in-a-decade-of-umesh-yadav-1276097 Very good article about him.
Samcric Posted September 4, 2021 Posted September 4, 2021 On 7/21/2021 at 9:55 PM, maniac said: Yes. Umesh would have won us a couple of overseas tests in Eng Sa and Nzl Umesh Ishant and Shami should have been one of the greatest top3 test bowling line ups of all time but it’s a good problem to have with the emergence of Bumrah. Now I think he is getting a reality check so time for Bumrah to play country cricket. Not Ranji though. Even though Bhuvi was great in a couple of overseas conditions we have wasted investing in him. It’s like investing 100$ in something and getting $1 return after 20 years. Useless Bhuvi was the closest we got to having someone like Woakes. Should have been protected and used intelligently by the team management and BCCI. instead his injury was mismanaged at NCA. Bhuvi should be earmarked for SA, NZ and Eng tours and workload managed accordingly. But our TM is far too short-sighted. In this tour of England, we have plenty of seam bowlers and not one swing bowler. Imagine a fit Bhuvi bowling and then coming out to bat at 8 or 9. Shami and Umesh are not consistent enough. Hence the high economy rate. It is their own fault and not anyone else. No 'great' test bowler has that high Eco rate and dish out so many loose deliveries. Even after so many years of experience, they haven't gotten better on that aspect like an Anderson. Even on days that Anderson doesn't get wickets, he maintains a great line and length and doesn't go for more than 2.5 rpo. New guy and Vijy 2
Samcric Posted September 4, 2021 Posted September 4, 2021 4 hours ago, Trichromatic said: Kohli being fast bowler captain is myth. Absolutely. People forget that his benchmark was Dhoni, who will play Spinners and trundlers and was generally not that interested in test matches. He was a great LOI captain but he was not a good benchmark for a captain in test matches especially in SENA. Vijy 1
rollingstoned Posted September 4, 2021 Posted September 4, 2021 3 hours ago, rkt.india said: He did play 2/3 tests in SA. On England tour 2018, he got injured in LOIs before tests. Actually, he was carrying injury from IPL. And he has never been fit for a period in last 3 years. That was an example of gross mismanagement for that series. He has never been fit enough to play test cricket since that period imo. If I'm not wrong hr has stopped playing much first class cricket too.
Vijy Posted September 4, 2021 Posted September 4, 2021 7 hours ago, Samcric said: Bhuvi was the closest we got to having someone like Woakes. Should have been protected and used intelligently by the team management and BCCI. instead his injury was mismanaged at NCA. Bhuvi should be earmarked for SA, NZ and Eng tours and workload managed accordingly. But our TM is far too short-sighted. In this tour of England, we have plenty of seam bowlers and not one swing bowler. Imagine a fit Bhuvi bowling and then coming out to bat at 8 or 9. Shami and Umesh are not consistent enough. Hence the high economy rate. It is their own fault and not anyone else. No 'great' test bowler has that high Eco rate and dish out so many loose deliveries. Even after so many years of experience, they haven't gotten better on that aspect like an Anderson. Even on days that Anderson doesn't get wickets, he maintains a great line and length and doesn't go for more than 2.5 rpo. we have misused swing bowlers consistently. Praveen Kumar was another guy who did well in Eng.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now