Jimmy Cliff Posted September 26, 2021 Share Posted September 26, 2021 Benefits far outweigh...sorry that's for a different thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted July 18 Share Posted July 18 (edited) Bad advice You can't "charge" your water with Vitamin D by keeping it in sunlight pic.twitter.com/pEYyHdf2Pi— Karthik Endocrinologist (@karthik2k2) July 17, 2023 Edited July 18 by coffee_rules Lord 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted July 20 Share Posted July 20 (edited) On 7/18/2023 at 11:42 AM, coffee_rules said: Bad advice She says keep water outside in the sunlight and super-charge it with Vitamin-D!! Bad science. As water is sourced in lakes and reservoirs are usually soaking in the sun. It should be having loads of vitamin Ds if it can take it!! Edited July 20 by coffee_rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BacktoCricaddict Posted July 20 Author Share Posted July 20 12 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: She says keep water outside in the sunlight and charge it with Vitamin-D!! Bad science water is sourced in lakes and reservoirs usually in the sun should be having loads of vitamin Ds if it can take it!! Actually, the Vit D in sunlight-soaked water is in an inactive form. You can activate it by sending positive emotions to it. coffee_rules 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravishingravi Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 Activists scientists. I like that term https://twitter.com/toadmeister/status/1695315180987551770?t=FzbdcFcCA9KVG3JBuPJTjA&s=19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BacktoCricaddict Posted August 26 Author Share Posted August 26 (edited) 6 hours ago, ravishingravi said: Activists scientists. I like that term https://twitter.com/toadmeister/status/1695315180987551770?t=FzbdcFcCA9KVG3JBuPJTjA&s=19 It's not just a term. It's a real thing. It applies to a good number of climate activists well as anti-vaxx "scientists" like Jay Bhattacharya, Robert Malone, Malarkey and Ivermectin Peddler, who are all unwilling to change their pet conclusions based on good evidence to the contrary. To a significant extent, it also applies to guys like Fauci and Baric with regard to Covid origins. While the origins are inconclusive (and will likely remain so), there is enough evidence to elevate the lab origins hypothesis to the same probability of occurrence as the "nature" origin hypothesis. But it doesn't fit the narrative of some of these guys - so much so that it took moving heaven and earth to get them to even acknowledge the possibility in light of new evidence. Edited August 26 by BacktoCricaddict Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BacktoCricaddict Posted August 26 Author Share Posted August 26 It also bears mentioning that Dr. Vandana Shiva is referred to often as an activist scientist. That is half-correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 (edited) 46 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said: It also bears mentioning that Dr. Vandana Shiva is referred to often as an activist scientist. That is half-correct. The seeds of Vandana Shiva, watch it ! Amalgamation of Feminist, Agriculturalist, Biotech entrepreneur, Climate change expert activist and what have you! Edited August 26 by coffee_rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BacktoCricaddict Posted August 26 Author Share Posted August 26 3 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: The seeds of Vandana Shiva, watch it ! Amalgamation of Feminist, Agriculturalist, Biotech entrepreneur, Climate change expert activist and what have you! Should remember to quadruple my BP medication the day I watch this coffee_rules 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted September 1 Share Posted September 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BacktoCricaddict Posted September 1 Author Share Posted September 1 26 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: It must be acknowledged that (a) timely action on NOx and SOx pollution was required and taken, directly resulting in drastically better rain water. (b) Same thing with CFC ban directly helping to save the ozone layer. Not all environmental alarmisms are created equal. Some are actually necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 4 hours ago, BacktoCricaddict said: It must be acknowledged that (a) timely action on NOx and SOx pollution was required and taken, directly resulting in drastically better rain water. (b) Same thing with CFC ban directly helping to save the ozone layer. Not all environmental alarmisms are created equal. Some are actually necessary. Can you share some information on acid rain and ozone layer depletion? I am not hearing about them anymore and I suspect they have been repackaged as global climate change Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravishingravi Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 https://twitter.com/VivekGRamaswamy/status/1697711813582852602?t=Gvmp329u-mHQljQDjPBHCQ&s=19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khota Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 On 7/28/2021 at 11:04 AM, Alam_dar said: In my observation these are the same folks who believe in every type of Conspiracy Theories too. They love Trump and Elon Musk too. Add Vivek ji also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khota Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 5 hours ago, ravishingravi said: https://twitter.com/VivekGRamaswamy/status/1697711813582852602?t=Gvmp329u-mHQljQDjPBHCQ&s=19 Can you take a break from posting stupid stuff. I am trying to help you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BacktoCricaddict Posted September 3 Author Share Posted September 3 On 9/1/2023 at 9:52 PM, coffee_rules said: Can you share some information on acid rain and ozone layer depletion? I am not hearing about them anymore and I suspect they have been repackaged as global climate change Not all environmental problems are created equal. Some are worse than others. Depletion of the ozone layer and acid rain are completely separate from climate change. There is enough solid evidence that (a) the ozone layer is important for keeping UV rays at bay, (b) CFCs from air conditioner coolants and aerosol sprays were depleting the Ozone layer, and (c) phasing CFCs out has resulted in significant improvements. So, action was necessary and taken, so you don't hear much about it any more. Same thing with acid rain. Decreasing sulfur oxides (SOx) and Nitrogen oxide (NOx) pollution has had a significant effect on decreasing the acidity of rainwater in the US. The problem with Anthropogenic climate change is not that it does not exist (it does). But (a) attributing every environmental problem and adverse weather event in the world to climate change and making doomsday predictions without scientific evidence and (b) rejecting high-quality tech solutions like nuclear all go to show that the climate change movement is led by misguided activists who misrepresent the science. Khota 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khota Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 15 hours ago, BacktoCricaddict said: Not all environmental problems are created equal. Some are worse than others. Depletion of the ozone layer and acid rain are completely separate from climate change. There is enough solid evidence that (a) the ozone layer is important for keeping UV rays at bay, (b) CFCs from air conditioner coolants and aerosol sprays were depleting the Ozone layer, and (c) phasing CFCs out has resulted in significant improvements. So, action was necessary and taken, so you don't hear much about it any more. Same thing with acid rain. Decreasing sulfur oxides (SOx) and Nitrogen oxide (NOx) pollution has had a significant effect on decreasing the acidity of rainwater in the US. The problem with Anthropogenic climate change is not that it does not exist (it does). But (a) attributing every environmental problem and adverse weather event in the world to climate change and making doomsday predictions without scientific evidence and (b) rejecting high-quality tech solutions like nuclear all go to show that the climate change movement is led by misguided activists who misrepresent the science. If anyone is challenging depletion of Ozone layer has already made up his mind. No use discussing anything with them. There is a word for them called Flat earther. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khota Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 On 9/1/2023 at 3:21 PM, coffee_rules said: 1980's and 1990's were everted by changing the refrigerants. Ice caps are depleting and earth is 1 C higher. Glaciers are melting in Himalaya's and dams are not designed to handle that much water. But you do have the option to bury your head in sand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts